Sentences with phrase «goal scoring ratio»

His goal scoring ratio had gone beyond a goal every other game and transfer fees in the region of # 5m were being quoted.

Need to see Walcott play too because his goal scoring ratio is up there currently and goals win us the matches!

Welbeck never played through the middle enough to have a comparable goal scoring ratio.

Welbeck???????????????? I know many people don not agree GRD is better than Welbeck; please check their goal scoring ratio.

The goal scoring ratio for Poldoski is simply awesome but keep on warming the bench!

to be honest i think it is unfair to judge a player on just one game also i read somewhere that morata would rather join either chelsea or man united because of his past relations with both manager, concerning his goals scoring ratio it has to be mentioned that the majority of his appearances came from the substitutes bench which makes it more difficult for any forwards to score regularly, we all know the benefits for a player to play week in week out.

Arsenal need a 20 - 25 goals per season wingers left and right and Podol's goals scoring ratio has declined as a regular stater.

Not exact matches

Might be easier and more productive to count the goals scored rather than ponce around with your unspecified chance / goal ratio.

A Metro report shows that, somewhat surprisingly, the Gunners have the same goals scored per game ratio and the same goals conceded ratio with or without the Spaniard, but there is a big difference in the win ratios, 60 percent with Santi in the side and just 51 percent without.

He scored about 25 goals that season and had a ratio of 250 shots on target.

And if you look at his contribution, his 10 goals from just 18 games (with five of them as a sub) is actually a better ratio than the 18 scored by the Chilean in 34 games (two as a sub).

Even the title I have put at the top of this post could be seen as a bit on the harsh side on the 28 - year old, as he scored 19 goals for the Gunners last season, at a ratio of just better than one every other game, and he already has three for the new season so far, despite being well down the pecking order of forward players available to the boss.

This means we have to generate an almost unexpected goal conversion ratio from attack and therefore Arsenal needs to shape the team around superior attack and score default system.

Stats, for example, showed that Poldi was the best finisher in the league every year with Arsenal — goals - per - minute ratio, goals scored - per - shots taken etc..

One of the best scoring attacks in Europa on a minutes per goal ratio is Bas Dost from Wolfsburg.

The former AC Milan striker, who famously scored twice in the final of this competition in 2007's win over Liverpool, Filippo Inzaghi has an unsurprisingly great record in front of goal, scoring 46 goals in 81 games, at a ratio of 0.57 per game in the Italian goal poacher's great career.

Another former Milan star, Marco Simone scored 23 goals in 39 Champions League matches, with a ratio of 0.59 per game.

A ratio of one in three for both Newcastle and Inter Milan despite injuries or being played out of position or off the bench shows he does have the goal scoring knack.

then for me he is the starting striker, because then he is just as good as any striker out there, a ratio of 1 goal / game but as soon as he fails to score in two consecutive games the wc striker is the leading one again.

His chance to goal ratio is 20 to 1 and he scores goals when we already 2 or 3 gaols ahead.

Whilst Ozil was on his way to breaking the Chances Created League record, we squandered chance after chance — confirmed by our poor conversion ratio of goals scored from shots taken (16 % — 5th in the League stats table)-- hardly the stuff of title seekers.

The French striker has scored 10 goals in 18 games this season, and has improved his goals - per - game ratio from one goal per 2.75 games in his first season, now down to a goal every 1.8 games this campaign, but Wenger thinks he needs to improve on that before calling himself really top class.

A poor Conversion Ratio of goals scored from shots taken puts us at a lowly 5th position in the League and gives us a clue to what is our main weakness and why we came up short in the title race.

Odgers — who had a fight - to - goal ratio of 15 to 1 in the 1998 - 99 regular season, who had seven fewer shots during this postseason than Detroit Red Wings captain Steve Yzerman had goals — last scored so long ago that Monica Lewinsky was still doing her bit to bring down a president instead of simply doing bits on Saturday Night Live.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Last season Alexis scored 24 goals in just 36 starts for Arsenal (plus 10 assists), but in this one the 28 year - old has managed just 4 in 12 (and 2 assists), a ratio of 50 % compared to 2016/17.

his goal on Sunday was his first away goal for the club, in almost 5 years and over all in all competition he's scored well under 20 goals... am sure there are many many defenders with better scoring ratio....

Since signing for Arsenal, Giroud has scored 42 league goals in 84 Premier League starts — a ratio of exactly one in two.

If Giroud had taken our penalties for the past 3 years he would be closer to a 0.6 goal / game striker than his 0.43 ratio — assuming he scored most of them of course.

Saying «Thierry Henry is the best because his Premier League goals - to - games ratio is the best of all those who have scored 100 goals or more» is fine.

Dzeko has the same shots to goal ratio as Giroud pretty much plus Balotelli has never scored more than 14 league goals which was in Italy and Giroud managed 16 in the prem.

Higuain would get us an extra 7 or 8 goals over Giroud every 100 games and Benzema a little less (look at career goal / game ratios)-- unless you are going to tell me they can score more at Arsenal than they could at Real Madrid / Napoli.

The towering forward still managed a decent scoring record whilst at Anfield netting 40 goals from his 92 starts, which given the nightmare start he had is quite a good ratio.

He is a relative late - bloomer, does not have a very special career goals / game ratio (less than OG in fact), scores fairly straightforward goals, is very awkward to play against and works incredibly hard for the team all over the pitch.

In this article, we compare Ronaldo's scoring rate in La Liga — that is, 1.13 goals per game — to the ratios enjoyed by some of the finest forwards of football past and present.

Although Sánchez's minutes per assist ratio is slightly down in contrast to his debut season in 2014/15 (368 to 389), his minutes per goal ratio has improved, now standing at an impressive average of 130 minutes for each of the three goals he has scored in the Premier League this season.

If you want to paint a picture to compare Giroud to Rooney paint it over a similar time what that guy was doing earlier was averaged his goal ratio over Rooney's 11 year period in the league instead of the last 3 years in which Giroud played in the BPL, Oh on Average in the last 3 season Now Rooney has just scored 23.3 Goals a season to Girouds 15..

108 — Sergio Aguero averages a goal every 108 minutes in the PL; the best mins / goal ratio of any player to have scored 20 + goals.

That being said, Villanova has the No. 1 scoring offense in the country and sits in the top five in average scoring margin, assist - to - turnover ratio and effective field - goal percentage.

He's already scored seven goals in 10 league appearances and has a goal - minute ratio better than Harry Kane and Romelu Lukaku yet he isn't even guaranteed a place in the starting XI!

Suarez scored just four goals in the 12 matches between Christmas Day and the end of February - not an awful ratio by general standards, but the Uruguayan had upped the bar.

United have scored 16 goals so far this season, conceding 11, which leave them in a positive ratio after their, so far, good start this season.

But with Torres having scored six goals from 17 appearances, Ba hitting three from 13 and Eto'o just four from 15, the Special One will be well aware his strikers will need to improve their goals to games ratio if the Blues are to have a realistic chance of challenging for the title.

His scoring ratio, albeit in the Swiss and Russian leagues averages out at way over a goal every other game and his double strike in the CL last week has brought him into the public eye once again.

Benfica's Jonas has scored 33 times this season, but the Portuguese Liga's ratio of 1.5 means he will need to net well in excess of 40 goals to have a shot.

In 15 games, Arsenal has scored 15 goals at a ratio of one per game and have conceded only 17 goals, fewer than defending champions Spartak.

To put that into perspective, based on their ratios, Erickson would score 8 goals a season (if he played 38 games), whilst Ozil would score 7.

However, Origi was embarrassingly named in the Ligue 1 «Worst team of the season» by a French newspaper in 2014/15 despite scoring 8 goals in 33 appearances — a better ratio than 4 out of 5 of Liverpool's strikers last season.

Messi scored one more goals than Higuain during qualification but Higuain's goals per minute ratio was much better (a goal every 95.4 mins compared to Messi's 114.3 mins).

Cristiano Ronaldo has scored 61 times in 97 competitive internationals, but amazingly does not make our list of the strikers with the best goals - per - game ratio.