Sentences with phrase «goals we would score if»

Not exact matches

«If you don't have somebody who is keeping score, it is very easy for all of those people who have it as one of many goals to do the easy stuff first,» he says.

why??? if he's in the team to score goals do you think anyone would be complaining that he didn't dance five players before he put it in the net??

We deserved that goal, would have liked if Ramsey had scored his one.

referring decisions also go in our favour, for instance that dortmund goal sanogo scored was clearly offside, these things are apart of football, GREAT teams overcome these obstacles, GREAT teams do not crumble with 3 or 4 goal leads, GREAT teams do not concede 3 + goals in 40 mins REGULARLY, GREAT teams average more than one tackle every 90 mins, GREAT teams don't need more 7 clear cut chances to score, united have academy players in defence, in fact our defensive players are 15x better but VAN GAAL will get a result, united have had an injury list just as long if not longer than ours but VAN GAAL will get a result, united have just gone through a managerial shift but VAN GAAL will get a result, so why on earth are united in the title race and not arsenal?

Even if the Oilers didn't shave a single goal off of their goals against totals, just having a healthy McDavid for a full season scoring at the rate he scored at last season (and there is reason to believe he could actually improve that rate) could cut their goal differential from the minus - 42 it was this past season to nearly single digits.

They had many clean chances for goals, but they couldn't score, and when it ended 1 - 0 in Pakistan's favor, one of the major upsets of the Games, Charlesworth dropped back down into his squat, his head bowed, while all around him the Pakistani players fell to the ground, kissing the artificial pitch, surrounding the pale little man as if he were a fallen idol who had to be sacrificed — which, in a way, he was.

the problem isnt even giroud the problem we have is that we miss an atleast equally good striker, lets be honest we all know that giroud is a striker who has patches when he has his scoring patch he scores almost at a rate of one goal / assist per game and is in a worldclass form, the prob is if his annual dry patch comes we need an equally good striker

Mr. Wenger, please please pleaseuse that money to buy a goal scoring CF, anybody, anybody at all even if from Division 2 in EPL, Even if you get one on luncheon vouchers, even if he has a wooden leg.

We are more than capable of scoring goals against them, add in the similar tactics used against Bayern Munich (at the Emirate) and we could easily take a two or three goal lead into the second leg... that's If we have a fully fit squad come February, Of course!

My fear, what if next season Danny goes on to score like 3O goals in all competitions, and has like 15 assists to his name in the EPL, won't he request for the captain's armband?

With all due respect if i could take any players they would be Higuain and Koulibaly Higuain scored 36 goals from 38 matches and scored 29 one season for Real Madrid Of course he is not Suarez but better than what we have # 79 million release clause is way too expensive But im hoping Higuain wanting to leave will force Napoli to lower the price considerably

He is dumb, (not the first stupid red card he received against PSG), he is slow (look at the goals we scored against Chelsea and against Basel and ask yourself if Giroud could have been part of that), he's fragile (went missing we needed him most last season and not scoring for some 15 matches), and he is arrogant (doesn't score for 15 games and puts his finger to his lips when finally scores).

I think if LACAZETTE can keep this up, he's going to claim a place in the french world cup squad next year, his goal scoring instinct is sharp, he knows he won't get too much chances and makes use of the few ones he gets and he was unluncky not to have scored against chelsea and his header wasn't a fluke, he knew where the post were and he directed the ball, he will be handful for defender when our complete squad starts and luckily for us he's not an injury prone player, having him, Sanchez (if he stays), Giroud and Ozil fit will be vital for us this season and i see plenty of goals..

Since that Giroud removal in that Chelsea match, he has appeared to have intentionally withdrew himself from scoring goals for Arsenal as if to say to the Boss okay, win the title then let me see.

i hate a one goal lead and do defensive substitutions, you loose pocession and spent 15 ″ trying to keep the ball out of the net, then if they score, you have no juice to get a win, terrible... arteta?

With two wins in two games to start the La Liga campaign and four goals scored with none conceded, things are going to plan on the pitch even if there have been plenty of distractions off it.

We have to put faith in our players, I think Giroud can get 15 + goals, if Walcott plays RW then him and Sanchez should be able to contribute 10 - 15 each, hopefully Ramsey, Cazorla and Ozil can also find some scoring form.

I don't have a problem with having Giroud or any of our young strikers upfront, if both wings are covered by top class wing players who can score 15 + goals each.

If we had scored our chances, could have easily been 5 goals.

goodness i can't believe it people will still defend him.You know something when Giroud misses many chances like at Monaco i did not criticize him even based on that you know why?its because he has always not been clinical.The only way a team can improve is by indentifying its problems and solving them.Arsenal has Giroud as the main cf and Welbeck as backup to him.Giroud has done well scoring some goals some too important but collectively he does more harm than good.Do not use moments to judge a player judge him based on content.Giroud does not excel in many games than he excels in games.As a main cf you need to be consistent.I see people here saying Giroud can not dribble he cant do this he cant do that but its a bit crazy to criticize him for that because every player has his own style.Giroud limitations as a player costs arsenal and will cost us a lot.Most importantly his poor finishing which has cost us several times.Not good enough.His style of play is ok for us but a striker who can take on players and run behind defences very well would make us very strong and also should be clinical.For Welbeck he needs to works on his finishing and composure by doing the basic things right.He rushes infront of goal too much.For now he is just above average.However he can excel if he works on improving.Giroud and Welbeck will always be a pain in arsenal's neck for most part.Some will call me stupid but hey at least i want to analyze the problem.People may support Giroud or Welbeck to lead the line next season but as the saying goes if you fool me once shame on you but if you fool me twice shame on me.Will you let Giroud and Welbeck fool you again?

In Mahrez case, he is definitely a wide attacking player, who goes by opponents as if they are not there, has good technical abilities, a wonderful left foot, and does score goals, probably would score more in a team like Arsenal.

If Arsenal had equaled Tottenham's goal tally it would have earned at most 8 additional points, not enough to win the title, yet it would have scored more goals than Leicester.

All he was saying was that even if we don't bring a new striker we are still capable of scoring a host of goals from the players we have.

If he scored lots of goals I would not care.

I consider Drogba as dangerous as Hazard if not more whenever he plays against us, he has a good history of scoring goals against us.

He would walk straight in to the team, straight in to the league and I wouldn't be the slightest surprised if he directly scored 25 + goals during the coming campaign.

If he hasn't had the strikers at Arsenal, why does Sanchez out perform him and why does Giroud start and score goals for France?

If Walcott could stop being a sicknote along with Gibbs, our two best crossers, Giroud would easily be scoring 25 + league goals in a season.»

Alexis Sanchez need to go to club with a more ambition unlike arsenal, cos he is a winner and he needs to win more trophy, he scored 30 goals last season yet arsenal couldn't make top 4, that's to tell u a tree can't make up a forest but till now what has Wenger done to improve the squad to convince Sanchez to stay?nothing, and u expect him to stay with those players who don't have winning mentality and a coach that lacks ambition, Sanchez don't need money what he need is quality players...... my gunners fans all over the world let's be truthful to ourselves, how many of us will still remain in arsenal fc if we were Sanchez, with arsenal transfer activities so far in mind?

if that was reading they would have said reading miss 3 clear goal scoring chances.

I wouldn't be surprised if he scored and assisted more goals than all of ours (EC) put together, last season.?

People keep using stats to defend him because that's the only way to defend him.When you watch him most at times you he hardly wows you or is any special.Can i ask a question couldn't Chamakh or Bendtner or Aliadiere score about 15 - 18 goals with this super super creative arsenal midfield.I mean lets be honest if Chamakh in his first season should have scored 20 goals in EPL many people would still want him out you know why because watching every aspect of his game and also analyzing every aspect of his game he was below average in his time at arsenal to be honest.So its not only about stats because stats do nt tell me the whole story about a player though they are facts and don't lie the eyes do nt lie.And with this same eyes we look at players and say Aguero is better thab Bony, Costa is better than Remy, and so on.

And not only that he does that, but he uses Welbeck, a guy who fails to score a goal even if it's just him and the goal, as the main striker, even though he has Giroud on the bench, a guy who scored a goal in the first game.

Walcott even though he scored his fair share of goals is a very limited footballer who would be more so if not for his pace.

If I was Wenger I would bring in rues and Morgan.get it over with and win the da!mn bpl.a goal scoring winger could be a good buy for us and we might not need a new striker after all.

but then again, we cry out in agony when Giroud only scores 16 goals a season, Balotelli would score less, so even if Balotelli was handed to us for free, i wouldn't take that gamble...

A lot of goals haven't came from Chelsea's right side last season especially when Schurlle left and am sure he will be scoring a lot for them so I am not sure if that statement of him not being an upgrade is correct.

It seems like the other teams prefer to leave Josi open for a shot, rather than Subban though... Not sure Josi has the best shot on the team... But if Josi scores a few more goals, teams will watch him closely and that will leave other players open.

What about vincent janssen He has scored 14 goals in his last 11 games and made 3 assists He is a complete striker he can hold up the ball amd he can run behind defenders even he is not very fast he also play with his two legs and give very nice passes He is only 21 My ideal world will be if we got a super striker like zlatan and get this guy for the next years I'm sure he will be a beast in the coming years

If you have a striker only scoring a mere 10 goals a season for say, three years.

If the altercation had been seen by the referee, Mike Dean, and he had deemed it worthy of a dismissal, it would have left Alan Pardew's side with only nine men for the remainder of the game, as striker Glenn Murray had already received his second yellow after scoring two of the Eagles» goals in the encounter.

that tactic worked fantastically at the star of this season where walcott performed and it worked brilliantly for the team but after the injury of Theo, giroud had his dry patch and theo almost did nt even try... and the year before welbeck played reaaaally bad as a starting striker and scored 4 goals or something i think, if he had one worldclass or equally good striker as giroud, we would have enough and wenger could rotate them according to the patch / form of giroud like what he intended to do with walcott and giroud, which i had high hopes for but sadly only worked for half the season

We didn't look like scoring, even if we had 28 shots on goal.

his goal scoring record speaks for it self but would be better if we got him for cheaper price like closer to # 20 million, could be bargain for 2 - 3 years of shed - load of goals probably the most flamboyant of all the strikers we could be approaching this summer, has got a right nose for the back of the net and scores from every angle under the sun with both feet, and he would be a great stopgap until akpom comes good in 2 years time.

I guess it doesn't matter at the moment as we are scoring goals and winning anyway, but just think how many we would have scored if the midfielder had been as clinical as at the beginning of last season....

if you are really good enough to win the title and have players really up for it and a manager who knows how to bring out the best in them then YOU FIND A WAY to score the goals needed to get at least 6 points from 12... bottom line is this... AFC under Wenger has a loser mentality, SIMPLE..

Therefore, Alexis Sanchez will have to be at his prolific goal scoring best this season if Arsenal are to finish in the top four.

Lukaku is not a like for like player, he differs in one very important criteria and thats pace, in which if Giroud had this pace i would not think of replacing him, because that would have allowed him to score more goals.

We always wanted to keep a clean sheet, if we keep clean sheets we're going to win games because we can score goals up front, so you've got to give credit to everyone today.

I felt we could've been good for another four goals if the referee had treated both sides the same, but we did come out differently in the second half, looking to defend and score on the break.