Sentences with phrase «god are meaningless»

Your bible and god are meaningless to me, but you have the right to believe whatever you wish... Mr. Mohler is actively trying to legislate away YOUR freedoms and dictating by law what YOU need to believe... Do you not get that?

Otherwise the assertion of the love and forgiveness of God is meaningless, for in Jesus» thought love and forgiveness are not ideas but are real events in the life in time of concrete men

but if there is not a broken and crushed and humbled heart before God it is meaningless!

Fred only a believer would think life without God is meaningless.

An «anticipated» kingdom of God is meaningless and useless.

Not exact matches

If «soon» is that different to God, and according to the Bible it is, then the statement is rendered essentially meaningless for purposes of human understanding.

Of course, if you want to call whatever the explanation for the universe happens to be «god» then the word becomes meaningless and everyone believes in god by definition.

Is it possible that the message of comfort for those devastated by the faltering world economy will be nothing more than trite and meaningless words if not accompanied by a biblical response where we, the church, become the Good News, the economic expression of God in flesh?

if your so called god will forgive murders and child molesters as long as they go to confession and say 10 worthless and meaningless prayers, don!t you think god would forgive a person the tales birth control, if there really was a god, which there is not, I do not believe in god or wasting time going to church to try to get myself into the dream world heaven, but if I am wrong I am going to hell because that's where all my friends are going and I don, t want to hang out for eternity with you morons in heaven.

It's meaningless if you're going to say God is too nice to send people to hell.

In Christianity, for example, it's taught that people wouldn't do good things without belief in God, or that their good deeds are somehow «meaningless» without first believing in God.

If god is going to require us to certain standards, god himself would have to adhere to standards or they become meaningless.

'' If God is going to require us to certain standards, God himself would have to adhere to those standards or they would become meaningless.»

Austin, until you can prove that your god, your devil or any god for that matter actually exist, then your argument is meaningless.

What I have to wonder is, if we, as a Church, trust God to work and bring people to Him, or if we feel like we have to «help» by providing all these material possessions (which in the end are meaningless, the money spent on them might be better spent on improving the community, providing food for hungry, support for ministers and overseas missionaries).

I think perhaps that everyone is getting caught up in «proving a negative» when in fact the focus should be on the fact that «there is a god» is an un-falsifiable hypothesis, and thus meaningless.

My argument wouldn't be that I am offended so much... but that the oath becomes meaningless when it must be attached to bearded father figure sky god that will punish me for breaking the oath.

Sometimes the wound is apparently random and meaningless; to teach us there isn't a reason for everything, that we can't get our heads around it all, that not understanding and just trusting is the essence of faith — faith that takes us beyond our concept of God, which is always limited, towards a place of knowing the unknowable.

The God that created the universe is meaningless to me.

If by God is meant the Ground of Being, the Essence of Being, the Absolute, the Weltgeist, and all similar expressions, the reply is still No, for according to Schweitzer such terms «denote nothing actual, but something conceived in abstractions which for that reason is also absolutely meaningless» (The Philosophy of Civilization [Macmillan, 1949], p. 304).

Saying «God did it» is essentially meaningless.

All the errors and stuff you trip on, they're meaningless to me, they're stumbling blocks you get to trip on, so you can be happy in rejecting God, because God gave you what you wanted, and it made you happy... for now.

And if I said, «If God sent everyone to hell he would not be loving,» then that would also say that his love is without effect because no one is saved in spite of his love, again meaningless to humanity but only meaningful to God.

If I say, «If God sent everyone to hell he would still be loving» that means that God's love is without effect, and it depends on our response... meaningless to humanity but meaningful to God.

45:6 b - 7)-- or there is no God and thus there was no «creation,» and all is a meaningless accident.

For example, EVERY god - based religion says morality is external, so using that as a basis for choosing any specific one of them is meaningless.

With all their laudable effort to understand the integrity of the Scriptures, both Old and New, and to insist on the basic unity of the Bible; with all their recognition of the place of Jesus within the setting of Jewish piety and religious thought, these scholars sometimes fail to see that the very truth about God which the Bible as a whole affirms, and above all that which the New Testament says about Jesus himself, can be smothered by sheer biblicism and thereby made meaningless for those to whom the gospel should be a living, vitalizing, and contemporary message.

Then the organic complex will have been constituted of God and the World, the Pleroma — the mysterious reality that we can not do better than call simply God, since although God might dispense with the world we can not regard it as being wholly an accessory without rendering Creation incomprehensible, the Passion of Christ meaningless and our own struggle uninteresting.

Thus it is meaningless to call the Kingdom of God the «highest value,» if by this is meant the culmination of all that men consider good.

If all values are compossible, and are all actual in God, then it is meaningless to say that some values are only possible.

It should be the work of Christian teachers in every generation, first, to understand the Scriptures, to distinguish what gives unity to the message of the Bible from what is peculiar to this or that writer, what is central from what is peripheral, what is essential from what is accidental; and then, on the basis of such understanding, to develop a doctrine of the act of God in Christ which will be intelligible, or at least not meaningless, to the contemporary mind.

~ The concept of, «God is Love» is not clear, and ultimately meaningless to me (and you).

But to the man whose idea of God is nebulous to the point of negligibility the invocation of «God's Law» is quite meaningless.

Reason could fall into the temptation of going back to the security of its concepts, proclaiming that God - talk is meaningless.

«Everything - in - God» tells us that God is not so exalted that he becomes meaningless to human life, but rather is operative in the whole creation at every level, moving through it, working upon it, accomplishing the divine goodwill in it.

If the fourth event is only the stuff of dreams, the three preceding events around which the whole story revolves are meaningless, and the God who speaks and in speaking acts in these events is not only dead — he never was.

We wish to God that baptism were meaningless, because it proclaims and gives a meaning which cuts to the core the selfish, materialistic values of our consumer culture.

What I have shown is that how the relative nature of God is presented in neoclassical theism may have to change, not that there is no God, nor that all conceptions of God are impossible or meaningless.

This is God's «actuality,» never fully perfected, for that is a meaningless idea, but always fully inclusive.

To claim that God in his transcendent being foreknows all future contingencies has the inevitable effect of rendering his objective relationships with the world meaningless.

If they can not provide verifiable evidence for the existence of God, or any god, their words are completely and entirely meaningleGod, or any god, their words are completely and entirely meaninglegod, their words are completely and entirely meaningless.

God himself speaks harshly of meaningless religious practices in his word, so your comment «your religion...» is also meaningless.

It's more important to God that we be able to choose between good and evil (if he chooses for us, the choice is meaningless) than that he prevent us from doing evil.

If God overcomes our will, then our will is meaningless.

They are like a Wall St. business and people are meaningless, as is God, to them.

They say that «God is love» which is an absolutely meaningless, nonsensical statement, not to mention the problem with equating love with a being that would let anyone spend even one millisecond in a place like hell.

To simply say that the Bible is the word of God, without explaining that, is meaningless rhetoric.

These and many other promises would be meaningless and false if God replayed our sins and shamed us publicly in heaven.

To talk in that fashion is not to speak of a kind of meaningless re-enactment of what went on in the creation; it is to speak of a vital, living, and ongoing movement, where God knows and experiences (if that word is, as I believe, appropriate to the divine life) that which has taken place, but knows it and experiences it with a continuing freshness and delight — and, if what has taken place has been evil, with a continuing tinge of sadness and regret — such as must be proper to the chief creative and chief receptive agency who is worshiped and served by God's human children.

A portrayal of God which would see him as in no sense thus affected would be alien to the general biblical picture, and would reduce human activity to a meaningless and irrelevant series of events.