Sentences with phrase «god at»

In my own experience, however, I would say that I do see consistency and coherency in theism (which requires revelation to understand God AT ALL — for the reasons that you have already described).

Given that, I believe everything will be sorted out by God at the appointed time.

Or what of the possibility that «the ground of being, the ground of purpose, and the ground of order» in the universe need not be associated exclusively with God or even with God at all?

So I worship God at home on Sundays.

At the conclusion of one of her books of philosophy, The Fire and the Sun: Why Plato Banished the Artists, Murdoch summarizes her view of the artist's role in modern life: «To present the idea of God at all, even as a myth, is a consolation.»

The Greek idea of the impassability of God at certain crucial points won out in his theology, which ironically found its soteriological focus in the sacrifice of the God / Man.

Or must we conclude that he was as literalistic in this matter as the early Church, and expected a world historical act of God at a chronological point of time in the near future, as the Church expected her Lord's return?

What we can see is that all good, even to our personal reception into the bosom of God at the moment of our death, is a work and a communing.

Such a notion he finds incomprehensible, for he can see God at work only in the reality of his personal life and in his transformation.

He added: «It's a kind of fight or flight situation... you've just got to take it to God at that point and hope that you make it and hope that you're safe.

My prayer to God at the time was, «Help me to labor with you in building a church that looks more like heaven than like me.»

See his Creationism on Trial: Evolution and God at Little Rock (Minneapolis: The Winston Press, 1985).

So far as most Western men have conceived God at all, in distinction from believing in him or merely picturing him in the manner of mythology, they have done so in the concepts of the Greek metaphysics of being.

(I'm not, and i do not believe in god at all).

In his latest book, published in September and provocatively titled The God Delusion, he slates the whole rationale behind belief in God at all.

The Indian god at least has some eye witnesses... there are NONE from the bible... ZERO... not one eye witness account.

Now I absolutely agree that there are those that who have seemingly no desire to worship God at all but just show up every now and again for whatever their reasons may be.

Led by a California atheist who has tried to remove the phrase «under God» from the pledge of allegiance, a group of atheists filed suit in federal court Tuesday (Dec. 30) to block prayers and mentions of God at President - elect Barack Obama's inauguration on Jan 20.

I am not sure why Satan and his angels ever thought they could defeat God by rebelling against him, but we must believe that they know God at least as well — if not better — than we do, and so the lack of understanding must be ours.

«Parents must reject secularised and anti-natalist sex education which puts God at the margin of life and regards the birth of a child as a threat.

It is a statement he enjoys making at parties, but his serious problem is not the non-existence of God at all.

@jf well your information about the New Testament is about as accurate as your Old Testament knowledge, The prophecies of the Old testament concerning Christ could not have been written after the fact because we now have the Dead Sea Scrolls, with an almost complete Old Testament dated 100 - 200 years before the birth of Christ, Your interpretation of God at His worst shows a complete lack of understanding as to what was being communicated.We don't know what the original texts of the New Testament were written in as to date there are no original copies available.Greek was the common language of the day.Most of the gospels were reported written somewhere in the 30 year after Christs resurrection time frame, not the unspecified «long after «you reference and three of the authors knew Jesus personally in His earthly ministry, the other Knew Jesus as his savior and was in the company of many who also knew Jesus.You keep referencing changes, «gazillion «was the word used but you never referenced one change, so it is assumed we are to take your word for it.What may we ask are your credentials?Try reading Job your own self, particularly the section were Job says «My ears had heard of you but now my eyes have seen you.Therefore I despise myself and repent in dust and ashes»

Be very mindful how you pin a name on your brother sister; remember the church is there the burden and those who have sinned yet we become so eager to judge; the word has already judged him, God at this very moment is dealing with him in ways that no man can as we judge him, we have judged ourself, we can easily forgive when his sin is like ours, but when it is not; they killed CHRIST CAUSE HE SAID HE COULD RISE THE TEMPLE IN THREE DAYS; to the people of that day and time it was a lie; as we forgive him we are forgive ourselves for believing in man and not the word; the word is still true, and God can still use him; but we must believe and fellow the word God no matter what; God has a way of making something good out of what is bad; that where the hope comes in; the faith in blessed redemption; heal our nation lord; heal our minds love forgive all;

The Spirit, given to us by God at the moment we believe, helps us gain deliverance from the power of sin in our lives.

There is just no such thing as a «Jew», no such thing as a «pure» and «separate» race from the rest of humanity, and no god AT ALL in the FIRST FCUKING PLACE!

It's very hard to believe in an omnipotent god (or any god at all) when cretin pastors aren't incinerated by bolts of lightening

The fruit, he said, was an indication of God at work in their life, and so if God was at work, then that person must be ready to receive God's Word.

What we have here is a «ladder of being» not uncommon in ancient times: there is God at the top, with human beings below God but above all other animals, and there are also beings above humans.

To say that God is without any limitation is to say that there is no God at all, for to have any nature or any character or any meaning there must be limitation to this rather than that.

However, John 1:18 states, «No man hath seen God at any time...» Both statements can't be true.

If you were to carefully study the Bible with someone who truly know and understand scripture, and you kept an opened mind, leaving «bias» at the door, unlike evolutionist who teach you to leave God at the door, then you might get enlighten and come to understand «What The Bible Really teach!»

Whatever his view of God at the time of his early death, Camus understood the attraction of the sacred — and in more than mere intellectual recognition.

If believer A is from a shame culture, and believer B is from a guilt culture, and both of them have thoroughly learned the lessons of the gospel, what unites them will be a shared theocentric culture, in which shame is shame before God at the judgment seat and guilt is guilt before God at the judgment seat.

What I question is why people continue to hold on to the belief of a god at all.

It is in Jesus - as - human that Christians see God at work within and amongst us.

I protect kids for a living, do everything I can to help ALL people, respect all life and give everybody their dignity, give my time and resources to help others, complain little, hurt nobody, want minimal things for myself and often go without, sacrifice for family, friends and community, but because I do not think there is a deity in the sky, I'm going to Hell while some selfish, ignorant, mean, destructive, abusive and hateful person who says, «Sorry» to God at the end of their life goes to Heaven.

I'm not a GOPer Mathematicians and physicists believe in God at a significant higher percentile than do those in the life sciences.

I feel Church buildings have to become Center's of Community, to establish God at the center.

The cross of Christ reminds us that those who, by the grace of God, have received a welcome into the family of God at such great expense must now be willing to live like Christ.

I used to fall into that group, then I realized that there was no need for a God at all, and became Agnostic, because I couldn't disprove God.

Who cares what people believe or if they left one church and found another, or if some do not find (or want to find) a God at all.

When someone goes through a tragedy, and they experience the comfort of God, they are giving testimony to the great power of God at work in their life.

I was exposed to enough twisted perversions of the word of God at an early age.

As the Bible says, «no man has seen God at any time.»

4Cobb has proposed a solution in terms of the occasion's past world, which I question in my essay, «God at Work: The Way God is Effective in a Process Perspective,» Encounter 57 (1996), 327 - 340, at 332f.

- i am confident there were some people who were touched by God at the event.

But one can never see God at work, nor God's presence.

Simeon hath declared how God at the first did visit the Gentiles, to take out of them a people for his name.

We began Section I of this chapter with the question of whether our common sense today allows for talk about God at all.

If they believe in God at all, they accept the idea that his reality is prior and incomparably superior to that of the world.