To utter such a thing is to simply decry by fiat «
god dun it» & that you're not genuinely interested in knowing the natural processes responsible.
Get a f - ign education and vote for someone who will make a difference... not someone who claims «
god dun it» because they're just morons.
Therefore, the big bang, evolution and all that other science stuff, even if it didn't have the tons of evidence supporting it that it has, is far more likely then «
God dun it.»
You pretend to know that
god dun it.
Not exact matches
Athiest Summary: Our
god of science doesn't prove it, and we hate the real God, so it just dun it all by itse
god of science doesn't prove it, and we hate the real
God, so it just dun it all by itse
God, so it just
dun it all by itself.
This is the theory proposed by Blessed John
Duns Scotus in which everything that is is viewed through the lens of the primacy of Christ, the freedom of
God and the contingency of the world.
The medieval Scottish Catholic scholar, John
Duns Scotus, challenged Thomas Aquinas's embrace of Aristotelian empiricism and reason, and inclined, rather, towards a
God who was so sovereign that He was entitled to behave as irrationally as He pleased.
In response to the corresponding ethical question,
Duns Scotus declared that what
God wills is good because
God wills it, rather than that he wills it because it is good.
Yet with the Blessed John
Duns Scotus and the Franciscan tradition, we can go back even further, to the beginning of the universe and before, to the eternal plan of
God in His eternal wisdom.
Duns Scotus maintained that
God is completely free and is not bound by reason.
The electing
God of Barth can not save Protestant theology, but it can lead to the revival of
Duns Scotus and his grand teaching of the Primacy of Christ.
Process theologians generally prefer the tradition of John
Duns Scotus, which holds that
God predestined the person of Jesus as the crowning of creation and as the total manifestation of his love, regardless of whether man sinned.