Any god fits your definition including ones invented by prehistoric man.
Not exact matches
you sir are practicing a religion one that means so much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool of themself the same as calling them a fool which would mean you are very religious as far as Colin he said nothing that related to the debate I was in with you... we are talking about Atheism as a religious view not debating the existence of
God now look over the
definitions I have shown you and please explain how Atheism does not
fit into the said
definitions And you claim that evolution is true so the burden of proof falls in your lap as it is the base of your religion.
If anything you
fit the
definition of a sinner as given by your buybull... you are a hypocrite who judges people and your
god says judging is sinful.
For me a
god has to be God otherwise how does it even fit the basic definition of what God
god has to be
God otherwise how does it even fit the basic definition of what God
God otherwise how does it even
fit the basic
definition of what
God God is.
No, lets assume there are no
gods, or nothing that would
fit your descrition of
god since the likely hood of weither of those options is much higher (given that yours is ONE possibility... YOUR
definition of YOUR
god... out of an infinite number.
It is a very small planet indeed if it all
fits into your personal
definition of
God and sin.
Not all pastors and other religious leaders automatically define sin by specific
definition as a disease, and it doesn't actually
fit my belief as to what sin is, which is an act to knowingly and willfully disobey a commandment from
God.
In this country we have become obsessed with ourselves so if
God does not
fit our
definition, we re-create Him to
fit our lifestyle and morality.
I have and I believe gay people are
God's creation based on the evidence and therefore do not
fit any of the
definitions of sin that are presented by prejudice Christians such as you..
People seem to love to make neat compartments and when I look at
God and the bible, these refuse to
fit into a neat system of
definitions.
That doesn't
fit the
definition of «religion» but it is the «religion» that
God is a part of, if we can call it that...
By your own cited
definitions of
god, existence itself would not
fit.
But that kind of
God doesn't really
fit our
definition of «
God.»
Many of my views seem to go against my faith, as far as common beliefs, but I believe in
God and believe in Jesus, so I think I still
fit the
definition of a Christians
The word «intimacy» means many types of behavior all of which can lead to a
definition I believe
fits God's plan for what husbands and wives can experience in their marital relationship.