Not exact matches
What is less clear to me is why complementarians like Keller insist that that 1 Timothy 2:12 is a part of biblical womanhood, but Acts 2 is not; why the presence of twelve male disciples implies restrictions on female leadership, but the presence of the apostle Junia is inconsequential; why the Greco - Roman household codes represent
God's ideal familial structure for husbands and wives, but not for slaves and masters; why the apostle Paul's instructions to Timothy about Ephesian women teaching in the church are universally applicable, but his instructions to Corinthian women regarding head coverings are culturally conditioned (even though Paul uses the same
line of argumentation — appealing the creation narrative — to support both); why the poetry of Proverbs 31 is often applied prescriptively and other poetry is not; why Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob represent the supremecy of male leadership while Deborah and Huldah and Miriam are mere exceptions to the rule; why «wives submit to your husbands» carries more weight than «submit one to another»; why the laws of the Old Testament are treated as irrelevant in one moment, but
important enough to display in public courthouses and schools the next; why a feminist reading of the text represents a capitulation to culture but a reading that turns an ancient Near Eastern text into an apologetic for the post-Industrial Revolution nuclear family is not; why the curse of Genesis 3 has the final word on gender relationships rather than the new creation that began at the resurrection.
I am sorry but
God is busy right now but your prayer is
important to us so please hold the
line and
God will get to you as soon as he is free.
Among other advantages, this
line concerning
God as the mind immediately sustaining and organising each and every aspect of cosmic matter is also
important for challenging the Deism of the prominent ex-agnostic Professor Antony Flew.
To carry through the process of rethinking the account of actual occasions and eternal objects in the light of the full doctrine of
God will be in
line with the direction in which Whitehead's own thought was moving at this point and will also alter in subtle, but at times
important, ways the precise form of the doctrine of
God.
The
important thing is that we know who
God is, that he is personal, and that we can only be in
line with reality and fulfilled as persons and as people when we understand and accept the true
God, and ourselves and others in him.