Not exact matches
But I'm
less certain that there is no
god of any
form, but I believe that to be true (if there is one, it doesn't seem to matter much).
Man, sure wish we cared
less about size and
form... if there's 2 or 3 believers, or 2 - 3000... or if we meet in a building or home or the street... and cared more about if the living presence of
God in power is there.
We can validly call for the ending of this
form of idolatry only as we can point toward the prospects of a
less idolatrous society, one that has a better chance of serving
God through serving
God's creatures.
Even if I accepted the premise that the Christian bible (in its present
form no
less) somehow represents the final word on
God's will... it still does not reveal any such edict.
Hartshorne is willing to begin with the metaphysical reality of
God and other selves (not just as a postulate, but as concrete existences), and then to use inference and imagination to provide an account of their nature and relations — an account which can he more or
less adequate to its object, given the limitations of our
form of consciousness.
God was not clearly thought of as supreme originative freedom sympathetically cherishing the creatures who were
lesser forms of originative freedom sympathizing with their fellows.
I agree but add:
God had no alternative to willing that there be some free creatures, first because (pace Alston) the idea of not creating at all could occur (if I may say so) only to a confused creature, second because, as Peirce, Bergson, and Whitehead have seen, by a «creature» we can consistently mean only a
lesser form of the freedom or creativity which in eminent
form is deity.
Even with
God, that is, supreme and cosmic freedom, whereas ours are only more - or -
less - good and localized
forms of freedom, the
forms of life are all
forms of freedom.
... the most important social task of Christians is to be nothing
less than a community capable of
forming people with virtues sufficient to witness to
God's truth in the world.
Basically, his solution takes the
form of distinguishing two different levels of human experience, or of more or
less conscious thinking about experience, on only the deeper of which is there an experience of
God that is both direct and universal.
To think
God is to think an analogue superior in principle to a human person; to think a human person is to think an individual with fallible, partly erroneous, unclear, more or
less confused
forms of knowledge but not the unqualified knowledge, coincident with truth, which
God has.
Perhaps in this process we have some hint as to the way in which the mind of ancient man,
less adept in handling abstract concepts, was led to express the conflicts he felt among the unseen forces about him in the
form of stories of the
gods and spirits.
Revelation comes in the
form of a divine promise which upon reflection turns out to be nothing
less than
God's own self - donation to the world.
The fulfillment of personality is thus a
form of communion, whether it be with the
God a man worships; or with nature under some aspect; or through intimate communication with ideal things, the inexhaustible quality of beauty or truth that pervades the universe; or with some cause that calls into action all one's powers; or even with things of
lesser significance so long as they satisfy the human craving for union.
Therefore, if possibilities do
form a dense continuum, there is no reason to think that
God as Hartshorne conceives of him is
less than maximally perfect.
In
less extreme
form, however, the objection implies that one may productively learn about the identity of the
God from the practices of his worshipers.
Creation is effected when the
god Marduk - Bel, with the assistance of
lesser gods, carves up Tiamat's carcass to
form from it the earth and its arching canopy, the firmament.
The second consideration is that as the individual develops in his life of prayer, he will find that petition for material advantage is
less and
less a part of his asking, and that more and more he desires only that he may be conformed to
God's Will, so that as Christ's Spirit is
formed in him he is enabled to live as un autre Christ — that fine phrase which was so often used by French devotional writers in the seventeenth century.
Another claim made by Hasker is that if
God were «routinely to intervene to prevent evil from being done, there would be far
less incentive to
form effective human communities, a large part of whose function is to encourage good behavior and to restrain evil.»
Diapers are new and have been used
less amount of time than some
form of EC since
God made man.
A US poll with comparable questions by CBS News in October 2005 found 48 % of Americans believed in creationism, 29 % thought that evolution had been guided by
God and only 15 % believed man had evolved from
less developed life
forms but
God had no role in the process.