there being no evidence of
god man felt compelled to create one» — Voltaire Only idiots and fools beleive in god and church bears only liars and thieves.
there being no evidence of
god man felt compelled to create one» — Voltaire»
Not exact matches
What a turd, I hope
god strikes him with lightning twice... shame on anyone giving this
man donations... look at his picture he looks a little mentally disturbed to begin with... I
feel bad for his family, especially his kids... imagine how goofy there going to be when they grow up...
How would you
feel if you knew that the smooth words of a
man or woman who should have helped you prepare to meet
God, were instrumental in sealing your condemnation?
As Anton LaVey explained in his classic work The Satanic Bible,
Man — using his brain — invented all the
Gods, doing so because many of our species can not accept or control their personal egos,
feeling compelled to conjure up one or a multiplicity of characters who can act without hindrance or guilt upon whims and desires.
God does not care about your warm and fuzzy
feelings about Him or trying to be good and it sounds like you're living on
man - made heresay about what you think
God expects of us.
Ten years after his holy death on April 2, 2005, Karol Wojtyla, Pope St. John Paul II, looms even larger than he did when the world figuratively gathered at his bedside a decade ago: tens of millions of
men and women around the world who
felt impelled, and privileged, to pray with him through what he called his «Passover» — his liberation through death into a new life of freedom in the blazing glory of the Thrice - Holy
God.
In short,
God allowed Israel's destruction as a judgement against their faithlessness; then almost 2000 years later,
Man decides to recreate it in some misguided sense of justice due to the suffering the Jews
felt at the hands of Nazis.
Geez, spin it how you wish if It helps you
feel like the bigger person (more like an arrogant ass)... what makes you so right and everyone so wrong??? Where is your evidence for this
god and don't use the bible - it doesn't prove a
god, it merely proves that
man has a vivid imagination?
When
men, who have agency and voice, are silent against the sexual predation of women, they not only contribute to the shame that victims
feel, they empower the predators who use wealth and power to continue their assault on our sisters created in the image of
God.
«If I
felt that prayer existed for the purpose of changing the mind of
God, then I would never pray, for how could I presume to interfere with the sovereign and holy councils of Almighty
God...
Men do not frustrate the plans of God, but rather it is God who frustrates the plans of men.&raq
Men do not frustrate the plans of
God, but rather it is
God who frustrates the plans of
men.&raq
men.»
Barth gathers the questionings of his friends into one gigantic interrogation point, and flings down to ethical theory the demand that it base itself not upon the conscious will of
man but on the uncertainly, though actually,
felt will of
God.
Epicurus taught the idea that pleasure of the individual was the sole good in life, though he also believed in the existence of
gods, whom they
felt did not create the universe, nor inflict punishment or bestow blessings, but that they were disinterested in what
man was doing.
There is no evidence that what these
men claimed to hear, see, or
feel was actually
god, even if they did experience it.
I am not a
man of
God so I don't
feel like I have to honor him with my comments.
Brian what is impossible for
man is possible to
God you may
feel that you cant and that is a good starting part tell
God that and then rely on the holy spirit to do what you cant because in him we can do all things.
God loves you no matter what you have done look at paul he killed Christians murdered them and
God forgave him was it hard for him i would expect so the guilt of his past must have affected him somehow.But it did nt stop him from moving forward.
Man of himself is tempted to oppose
God's will, to seek to do his own will, to
feel free only if he is autonomous; he sets his own autonomy against the heteronomy of obeying
God's will.
But what can be rather awkward or even scary as for «
feeling» it, that happens if
God unexpectedly shares with you a special view into a
man's or woman's heart.
Charles Wilson, the groom at the center of the controversy, said on Sunday, «All we wanted to do in the eyes of
God was to be
man and wife in a church that we thought we
felt loved.
A
man at the end of his rope decides to hope against all the odds, to remember the Rock when he
feels himself to have been left in the dust: «For I shall again praise him, my help and my
God.»
The
man who can not
feel at least some faint intimation of this grief is a paltry soul of base coinage, bearing neither the image of Caesar nor the image of
God.
But the trouble is «the inability to
feel towards
God and
man as they did.»
How can modern
man, whose world seems to topple about him, regain a living faith in the Living
God, so that he can
feel once more both the dignity of his own life and the dignity of the lives of his fellow
men — everywhere?
Throughout, I have
felt the lively cooperation of the
man whose intelligence, courage, and love of
God's world are given form and expression in this book.
But his alienation from his own powers not only makes
man feel slavishly dependent on
God, it makes him bad too.
Jeremiah, pouring out before
God everything he
felt, poured out his vindictiveness: «Bring upon them the day of evil, and destroy them with double destruction»; (Jeremiah 17:18) «Deliver up their children to the famine, and give them over to the power of the sword; and let their wives become childless, and widows; and let their
men be slain of death, and their young
men smitten of the sword in battle....
This lovingkindness will also ultimately come to include the
feeling of love, for if a person really loves
God, he loves every
man whom
God loves as he becomes aware that
God does love him.
In his darkest hours
man feels the hand of
God reaching down to him.
These words may be of little comfort for the young woman who still struggles to believe that her feminine qualities are valuable to
God, or to the young
man who has been made to
feel shame because he'd rather visit an art museum than watch a cage fight.
Perhaps the
man with the paralysis
felt like those who were listening to
God in the passage from Isaiah.
They show instead that «the conduct of
men perpetually changes
God's
feelings and modifies his treatment of them» (FG 64).
He's now looking to take his healing abilities to the U.K., but has met some opposition from the MP, who are concerned about having a
man show up who
feels that
God has called him to go around kicking sick people.
Again, it doesn't matter what I think the answer is, but it seems that a reasonable interpretation might hold those sections as being either hopeful wishes, as opposed to exiting
feelings, or in some cases descriptions by
men not by
God and therefore not entirely accurate.
He
felt himself to be the messenger of
God to summon
men to a life in
God and obedience to
God, and definitions were farthest from his interest.
I asked for power, that I might have the praise of
men... I was given weakness, that I might
feel the need for
God.
Are
men going to eventually
feel slighted by
God because they can not become pregnant and give birth to a baby?
To this useful image Marian Evans contrasts Dr. Cumming's
God, who «instead of sharing and aiding our human sympathies is directly in collision with them; who instead of strengthening the bond between
man and
man, by encouraging the sense that they are both alike the objects of His love and care, thrusts himself between them and forbids them to
feel for each other except as they have relation to Him.»
The idea of
God is really moral in its influence — it really cherishes all that is best and loveliest in
man — only when
God is contemplated as sympathizing with the pure elements of human
feeling, as possessing infinitely all those attributes which we recognize to be moral in humanity....
The idea of a
God who not only sympathizes with all we
feel and endure for our fellow
men, but who will pour new life into our too languid love, and give firmness to our vacillating purpose, is an extension and multiplication of the effects produced by human sympathy.
The fashionable latter term, in any case, should probably be resisted because it makes the assumption that any text that uses «he» for
God or «
man» for humankind automatically imposes a
feeling of exclusion on the women who try to read it.
Modern
man has elevated himself to parity with
God and now
feels justified in accusing
God of getting it wrong.
Some how it's
felt that values, morals, virtues are not there in a secular world only faceless solid lifeless laws of
men rather than what has been relayed by Holy books that calls for good deeds and reject bad deeds and to build a faithful societies, communities, nations since communications among nations or even among the nations of mixed cultures and beliefs... Laws or
God and universe are to be prepared by some thing that is equivalent to UN but built on nations beliefs to achieve the code of understanding among nations but as can see now it is build on groundless bases if not of words of
God to faiths... in addition to those non spiritual secular beliefs to make decisions of faith but at the moment the secular world make and take the decisions while the beliefs and faiths has to pay for it when it becomes a war between all faiths or religions outside your world, it would become back into your inside among the mixed culture and beliefs of the nation or nations under one country flag...!
Men had to
feel their sin, their worthlessness, and
God's forgiveness.
Nature is no longer personal in the old sense, yet
God is
felt to be responsible for what happens to
man through nature, for it is He who directly sustains nature.
And they represent ways in which, under given conditions and in given circumstances,
men and women have
felt that they were «saved» from what dragged them down and damaged their lives, and that they were being drawn as they responded in commitment of self to the action of
God in Jesus Christ.
It appears that there is general though only implicit recognition of the fact that a call to the ministry includes at least these four elements (1) the call to be a Christian, which is variously described as the call to discipleship of Jesus Christ, to hearing and doing of the Word of
God, to repentance and faith, et cetera; (2) the secret call, namely, that inner persuasion or experience whereby a person
feels himself directly summoned or invited by
God to take up the work of the ministry; (3) the providential call, which is that invitation and command to assume the work of the ministry which comes through the equipment of a person with the talents necessary for the exercise of the office and through the divine guidance of his life by all its circumstances; (4) the ecclesiastical call, that is, the summons and invitation extended to a
man by some community or institution of the Church to engage in the work of the ministry.
The good for Buber is not an objective state of affairs nor an inner
feeling, but a type of relationship — the dialogue between
man and
man and between
man and
God.
How
man felt and reacted became more important than what
God in Christ had done for
man.
Many
men and women believe that
God is all mighty and may do all, and that he is all wisdom and can do all; but that he is all love and will do all — there they stop... Of all the properties of the blessed trinity,
God wants us to
feel the greatest confidence and pleasure in love, for love makes power and wisdom humble before us.55
There are times in the life of an archeologist or historian when such immediate
feeling would give great satisfaction to the
man and hence to
God through his consequent nature, yet still
God doesn't make it available.