«This is internet
god mode for Microsoft computers,» a security researcher that goes by the handle Hacker Fantastic, told Motherboard in an online chat.
Not exact matches
I jot down anything interesting
for rumination vis - a-vis healthcare, [such as] Netflix's
god mode, or Jaguar's brainwave tracker.
Then «
God mode» is
for you.
Would that point to a
mode of thinking which does not (
for example) take feminist notions and human fatherly failures (or seeming successes) and press them back into the doctrine of
God?
That was a very interesting read many comments caught my attention I've recently been diagnosed with Bipolar I have hallucinations and hear voices in my ear's when I hallucinate it's likes they are trying to get me thousands of them I can only describe them as dark shadows and they are trying to get me just as they are about to get me a brilliant white light surrounds me and there's three entities humanly shaped but like this brilliant white light they are also glowing this brilliant whiteness I can't understand what they are saying the only way I can explain it is emotions comfort joy love is what I feel emanating from these entities the voices I hear aren't evil telling me to do bad things to people when I get put into a
mode of fear I live in a rough area of Scotland and everytime I've got into a fight something possesses me I know this
for a fact as I can't control myself I'm an observer watching my family / Friends say I change they say my eyes change and I look evil I personally do think possibly through my own personal experience I» am possessed as I act out of character I've lost interest in many things I've recently I decided it's time
for change I've lost my faith I've been trying to connect with
God and feel his love which I used to feel the presence of the holy spirit everytime I try connect I get a feeling of abandonment I just think if I am possessed could these entities stop me connecting with «
God» I can say from my heart of hearts «JESUS CHRIST HAS COME IN THE FLESH» I think it's more to do with the persons own personal fears which I have noticed my fears have changed if I had to be truthfully with myself I fear
God which I know I'm not supposed to just I can't explain it I guess if you ever need a test subject I'm up
for the challenge like I said I'm on journey to find myself and my travels have brought me hear I'm going to hang around
for a wee while there's lots of good information to be plundered loll
Jews and pagans generally taught that the manifestation of
God or the
gods to humans usually took place in a mediated or disguised
mode (through burning bushes or nocturnal visitors,
for example).
The meaning of time (which has always been a problem
for philosophers) when seen in terms of
God's self - revelation is that it is the
mode of becoming that a world has to assume while it is receiving
God into itself.
For it is demonstrable that our bodies of flesh and blood will be dissolved, and that in whatever
mode of existence we may be raised from death it will not be by either the resuscitation of this mortal body or its transformation — unless, indeed, we follow the speculations of some of the Fathers concerning the reassembling, by
God, of the dispersed molecules of the flesh, which I am not inclined to do.
If we ask what he means by «it», he can not precisely tell us; but he is evidently groping after the idea that «we», that is our personalities, will be re-made by
God for a different
mode of existence from that of the flesh - and - blood body, and yet that in some way we shall retain our identity and be the same personalities as those which now live in the
mode of physical beings.
What Neville does not seem to recognize sufficiently is that theistic faith demands an understanding of
God who is the object of its faith and worship (
for the believer can not relate himself to what is unknown to him) and, furthermore, that it generally demands a coherent concept of
God who is not only the ontologically, valuatively, and rationally other but also an individual reality who instantiates these qualities in a personal
mode of being.
each of those religions have well respected scholars and leaders who argue that other
modes of worship are acceptable
modes (
for other people) to reach the same
God.
The further problem is to define within the parameters of Whitehead's metaphysics how it is that the completed actual occasion, through its own transitional creativity (Whitehead maintains that the appetition
for the future is a
mode of creativity), is united to
God in such a way that it participates in
God's feelings of its own transformation.
One may understand the personality of
God as His act — it is, indeed, even permissible
for the believer to believe that
God became a person
for love of him, because in our human
mode of existence the only reciprocal relation with us that exists is a personal one.
The ironic and indirect ways of affirming and denying —
God bless the Czar and keep him far, far away —
modes of speaking that are so important
for Jewish humanism, are found in Yiddish, a plastic language that hung like a long suspension bridge over the chasm that separated the world of an isolated, vulnerable religious minority from the dangerous Gentile - dominated majority culture.
It is sufficient then that we see the Church's sacraments as promises,
for it is in the
mode of promise that
God becomes most intimately present to us now.
Its mind - numbing to see that the go to position
for atheist regardless if they are mainstream or not is to go into instant ridicule
mode if one brings up faith and
god.
Brunner recognizes that the Bible does not explicitly settle
for us the many questions that arise as to the
mode of
God's presence in Jesus.
Whitehead's refusal to accept imperial ruler as a metaphor
for God found expression in
Modes of Thought as well.
Science and metaphysics too, providing the latter is viewed as a natural
mode of cognition and is not unconsciously supplemented by theological knowledge about
God's saving action in the history of redemption, can each from their own angle quite well think of
God as the transcendent ground of all reality, of its existence and of its becoming, as the primordial reality comprising everything, supporting everything, but precisely
for that reason can not regard him as a partial factor and component in the reality with which we are confronted, nor as a member of its causal series.
By working out a neoclassical theory of nonliteral religious discourse consistent with his neoclassical theism generally, he has not only overcome the notorious contradictions involved in classical theism's use of analogy and other
modes of nonliteral language, he has also given good reasons
for thinking that our distinctively modern reflection about
God results from two movements of thought, not simply from one.
It was in a sequence of servant poems, and in particular his portrayal of the Suffering Servant in Isaiah 53, that he set forth at the same time his high hopes
for his people and the
mode by which
God would bring this to pass.
Put differently, whatsoever really exists, in whatsoever way it does exist, has and must have
God, ipsum esse per se subsistens,
for its cause — but in a radical way that extends even to its
mode of being, its very mutability, its possibility
for otherness, interaction, frustration, and fulfillment.
Why did
God chose this particular
mode of creation
for living beings; this «state of journeying» from imperfection to perfection which will only be complete on the Last
However, this «new kind of reality,» who is Jesus, is an emergent manifestation of
God in human life emanating from within creation: «a unique manifestation of apossibility always inherently there
for human beings by virtue of their potential nature being created by
God... a new
mode of human existence emerged through Jesus» openness to
God making him a
God informed human being» (ibid).
His
mode of reflection constitutes a paradigm
for those concerned with a theology in service of the hearing of
God's word.
Our pastoral theology will find allies in other
modes of seeing and hearing the Word of
God, and we will wait with patience and modesty
for the appropriate definitions of what it means to love
God in the world.
His task, therefore, is twofold: (1) to show how this
mode of presence of a contiguously related past actual occasion within a presently concrescing occasion is applicable to the relation between
God and man and (2) to show how on this basis one can proceed to explain the possibility of
God's differing presence from person to person so as to account satisfactorily
for his unique presence in Jesus (PPCT 385).
Foundational theology, rooted and grounded in
God's revelation in the past, is a historical
mode of reflection that, by exploring the origins of the Christian faith community, attempts to answer
for each generation the fundamental question of what it is to be Christian.
In other words, Ogden's analysis of various descriptions of experience is informed by two distinctions, both of which apply to the noetic pole of experience: a twofold distinction between nonsensuous and sensory
modes of experience and a threefold distinction of what Whitehead calls «the feeling of the ego, the others, the totality,» that is, of self, other, and whole (PP 84).8 This comprehensive hermeneutical grid then permits an explanation of what he claims is a «sense of ourselves and others as of transcendent worth,» as precisely an «awareness of ourselves and the world as of worth to
God» (PP 86f) Y Ogden notes that such an evidently theistic explanation is not open to empirical or experiential confirmation on either of the two more restrictive descriptions which, as he observes, must either «refer the word
God» to some merely creaturely reality or process of interaction, or else., must deny it all reference whatever by construing its meaning as wholly noncognitive,» if they seek experiential illustration
for such a sense at all (PP 80) 10
But our major concern in this chapter is to sketch the
mode of reading the Bible which is appropriate to its character and to its role as the vehicle
for God's Word.
For a believer thinking in a process - relational
mode, Christ is both act of
God and emergent from the evolutionary process.
We are,
for instance, constantly being reminded by those who have an interest in declaring the robustness of Christianity in America today that such - and - such a high percentage of Americans are to be found in church each Sunday and that an even higher percentage profess to believe in
God; and while such numbers surely do not mean nothing, the very fact that the Christian party so often needs to invoke them is evidence that the religious enterprise,
for all its vaunted majority status, is in a deeply defensive
mode.
It may even be that he in fact adopted something very like it,
for in
Modes of Thought he identified
God with the whole in a way that is highly congenial to this doctrine.
Too many have accepted the popular «neo-orthodox» idea that contemplation and mysticism have no place in the Christian life; on the contrary, they have a real place and an important one; and
for those who may be called by
God to this particular
mode of communion with him, there is a great blessing and a wonderful gift.
In its portraits of
God's revelation in the
mode of «promise,» biblical religion gave rise to the experience of history as an opening of events to an always new future bearing a universal meaning
for the events that take place in time.
For the purposes of our sketch of the Christian life, however, a shift in terminology helps us note the need to change our orientation to
God in order to tap the new
mode of divine presence.
Indeed so,
for according to this affirmation the
modes of
God's presence in the cosmic religions, in Judaism, and in Christianity are radically distinct.
Or, in a less moralistic and more psychological
mode: To understand
God is to act in such ways in this given situation involving another person that I may discern how
God's grace is at work in the trans - actions between us to correct what is amiss and, where life is broken, empower
for new life.
Theology differs from such
modes of thinking about
God and man because it is a pure science, disinterested as all pure science is disinterested, seeking to put aside all extraneous, private and personal interests while it concentrates on its objects
for their own sake only.
for example in steph's
god mode season, steph had bigger dropoff in shooting percentage without klay than klay without curry.
Why on
Gods Green Earth would the likes of VVD, Lemar, Mahrez, Asenscio, Seri, Goretska, Carvalho, etc. play
for a club that is in crisis
mode and has transparently displayed a pathetic lack of ambition both domestically and in Europe.
Then the dude went into Point
God mode, going the coast - to - coast in 4.4 seconds
for the damn prettiest finger role to maybe ever secure a tournament bid, as Bama beat Texas A&M.
«We are fighting
for the league title, this is why we had to play in an offensive
mode to win the game, but thanks
God for the final result.
The concept of building a base in
god -
mode and afterwards be allowed to experience the world, and act as a direct leader of your troops, makes this game great, and furthermore strikes down on something I,
for one, have wanted to see since Red Alert 1.
Thank
God for that interesting co-op
mode.
I am impatient
for God of War to get its photo
mode.
After 6 + season passes
for stupid costumes, they never put an arcade
mode!Thank
god SF5 is coming up with an arcade
mode and thank you tecmo
for never listening to your customers.
However if you're reading this review you probably already know that
for the first time,
God of War has introduced a multiplayer
mode.
Sony Santa Monica Studio has released the photo
mode update
for God of War PS4.
After picking your difficulty level (a new wrinkle to Skate â $ «each level basically tailors the gameplay to your ability though even if youâ $ ™ ve been a mondo
god at the last two games, Hardcore
mode is strictly
for those of you pursuing the perfect bail movie) youâ $ ™ re off and running, exploring the vastness of the gameâ $ ™ s single player career
mode.