Sentences with phrase «god or any god type»

Your belief in god or any god type is nothing less then equal to that of children believing in santa — be good or else!

Belief in god or any god type is nothing less then equal to that of children believing in santa — be good or else!

those of whom can not prove the existence of god or any god type creature believes purely on the idea of its existence... the notion of what the idea stands for is great — a supreme being with infinite knowledge and power who is behind it (life) all... truly a fantastic idea indeed....

Not exact matches

Most atheists are also agnostics but it's very possible to be an atheist and still believe in a type of spirit or god existing, it's more of a deism though than anything else.

This is why we have governments but its up to people which type of government they want, the world's governments or Gods Way, simple really.

By choosing to believe in one thing and not another and still call yourself an X type of christian (whether it be catholic or protestant) aren't you just defining god in your own head and not the way the bible is clearly telling you?

There are two types of Athiests; Scientist athiests who shed no emotions talking about rational concepts or lack of proof; and Angry Athiests, whio consistently feel the need to mock other faiths, and post incessantly any time someone mentions the word God or Jesus.

«It is symptomatic,» she wrote, «that the Congress for Cultural Freedom, which God knows, has never lifted a finger in this country for either culture or freedom, has become a kind of collecting point for these types.»

Atheism means no belief in god or any similar type belief system.

@preacherlady, Why would God or Jesus play this type of vicious, evil game with someone who was earnestly looking for them?

God does not teach or condone hate, in fact if i remember right he says to love one another [I don't recall HIM pointing out certain types, colors, religions, to HATE.

The problem is most believers believe in that type of God, which your school of thought can not set those parameters around.Now if that school of thought helps you come to a belief or an opinion that there is no God then fine, because I certainly could not bring any solid evidence to contradict that belief, but if your proclaiming that there is no God to be a fact, there really is no basis for that fact.

If you were going to «make up a story» and have it be believable based on what God could have done, why not have Stephen ascend to heaven and some few that tried to stone Stephen before, have them swallowed up in the earth, or some other wrath of God type actions to end the account with a bang so everyone will believe it?

We don't say there are six types of Theists, we focus on the Religions, and that is what is missing — a modern Religion / Belief system for Atheists — as Atheism does not mean without rules, just about whether God exists or not.

Maybe the 700 club types or the extremist go through life saying that they have all the answers to what is God and that their interpretation is the only truth.

These are all distinct types or degrees of love; though they all have their source and summit in God.

No one in the history of the planet has come forth with any evidence to support the claim that any type of a god or gods exist.

There were three types of Man described: ones who chose celibacy to dedicate themselves to God's service, such as monks, priests, or nuns; those castrated by others, these are traditional eunuchs; and those who were «born that way.»

I don't think that's what Catholic dogma teaches — it is merely for the type of suffering you are describing, that during suffering, the strength one can draw upon is from a closeness with God (or a feeling of something greater that can help one).

If we map socio - political structures to types of theism we have democracy is agnostic (belief or not what you want), capitalism is pantheism (money is God and everything has a price) and dictatorships and other non-democracies are akin to prophet - led religions or mono - theisms.

In fact it's more disgusting if someone claims to represent God and then molests or child, protects those who do, or contines to support the organization which hides this type of behavior.

All are in the same situation and no authority — not scriptural status, liturgical longevity, or ecclesiastical fiat — can decree that some types of language, or some images, refer literally to God while others do not.

Or was the human being who typed these words a mere organic robot simply obeying programming from God or fatOr was the human being who typed these words a mere organic robot simply obeying programming from God or fator fate?

(Theism of the Second Type; much contemporary Protestant theology, doctrines of a «finite - infinite» or perfect - perfectible God.)

It will be seen that the God of second - type theism is not without qualification finite, or growing, or emergent; nor, without qualification, is he the contradictory of these.

Jeremy before the Gospel was preached in New Zealand my people the maori people already had many gods and lived under there own type of spiritual law.They had rituals to keep themselves holy or pure but was by works.They also believed that there was one supreme God who was above all other Gods and his name was eo.So when the Missionaries came they understood the message of a supreme God and the way to know him was through his son over 60 % of maori people accepted the Gospel.It was bigger revival than the welsh revival in terms of percentage of population the welsh revival was only 10 % of the population of wales and that was considered a large revival in its day the new zealand revival was in the years 1820 - 1gods and lived under there own type of spiritual law.They had rituals to keep themselves holy or pure but was by works.They also believed that there was one supreme God who was above all other Gods and his name was eo.So when the Missionaries came they understood the message of a supreme God and the way to know him was through his son over 60 % of maori people accepted the Gospel.It was bigger revival than the welsh revival in terms of percentage of population the welsh revival was only 10 % of the population of wales and that was considered a large revival in its day the new zealand revival was in the years 1820 - 1Gods and his name was eo.So when the Missionaries came they understood the message of a supreme God and the way to know him was through his son over 60 % of maori people accepted the Gospel.It was bigger revival than the welsh revival in terms of percentage of population the welsh revival was only 10 % of the population of wales and that was considered a large revival in its day the new zealand revival was in the years 1820 - 1840.

Even if we do go with that explanation, it gets us no closer to knowing the type of god or his / her / its will and nature.

The only reason you are having those thoughts or thinking those words is because you thought I was a certain type of god, and I have not turned out to be that way.

My, how we all hate to let go and be plunged under the water and cast ourselves adrift into the everlasting arms of God's grace — particularly we Western materialistic types who think we have earned or deserve everything that we have.

The point being that this type of relationship between a man and man or woman and woman is forbidden by God and will be judged as sin.

The type of god Einstein apparently believed in is at least possible (a god who started the universe and walked away never to be seen or heard from again), however, the Christian concept of a personal god who watches over everyone at the same time is laughable.

Therefore, we just don't know for sure, so the only thing we can do is rule out certain types of gods, or theories, based on science and logic.

Did your God tell you he created 85 % Humans from a Monkey Gene called the RH FACTOR for that is the ONLY reason anyone's blood type would be either O +, A +, B + or AB +.

Jeremy i was stumped to on this one as well so i asked the holy spirit to help me i looked at alot of different possibilitys commentarys really werent any help apart from the background.Thinking that Jesus was somehow implicated with satan in any way seemed to be a contradiction of who he was.The holy spirit revealed that to understand these types of passages we can fully trust that God is who he says he is he he does nt change his character or who he is.He is almighty holy trustworthy faithful and more.

In the Reformation preaching image the Word of God may wrongly be equated with the solid lines of type in the book; the solidity of the pulpit may be misrepresented as the authoritativeness of something or other; and the preacher's power to interpret may be mistakenly equated with some kind of weight — not necessarily the girth of his stomach, but perhaps the athletic cut of his shoulders, or more probably the weightiness of his voice.

My goal is not adequately expressed by saying that I am to uphold an evangelical conservatism of generically Reformed or specifically Angelican or neo-Puritan or interdenominational pietist type, though I have been both applauded and booed on occasion for doing all these things, and I hope under God to continue to do them.

See it isn't about the type of sin that «looses» salvation, or not doing works that make you good enough, or that you should constantly wonder if you are pleasing God enough, but that repentance is a part of salvation.

It seems the most likely scenario is that he married his sister or less likely his niece.The reasoning is that Adam and Eve lived alot longer and continued to have sons and daughters GEN5: 4 aCTS 17:26 Paul tells us that the God who made the world hath made of one blood all nations of man to dwell on all the face of the earth.Cain did nt marry to another tribe or nation as every man and women was a relative and of the same bloodline of Adam and Eve.The importance of this is that sin entered through one man Adam and is past through the bloodline so redemption is only possible through the same bloodline.So for the formula to work the human genome had to stay the same no other tribes or nations just the descendents of Adam and Eve.It also solves another riddle in that satan at various times prior to the flood and after the flood tried to contaminate the bloodline by his angels having sexual relations with the women this created a type of alien in essence and would have not been able to have been redeemed by the blood of Jesus as it wasnt fully human.This is where the giants came from and why God wanted to destroy them as they had the potential to destroy the human race as they couldnt be redeemed by the blood of Jesus.Interesting?

cit., p. 91 f.; Two Types of Faith, p. 39) This exclusiveness makes it impossible to allow any part of one's life to remain a sphere separate from God, and it makes it necessary to recognize God as He is, and that is as not limited to any one form, image, or manifestation.

If you are addicted to a certain type or pattern of sin in your life, God has 100 % forgiven you for this sin.

For the temptation to treat God thus is not merely the temptation of those who practice a politics taken from Holy Scripture, or an ethics of the same type, against whom it is easy to be on guard.

There may be «gods», there may be a creator or creators, but certainly not the type of «god» represented by any organized religion.

In this scheme the quantifiers «all,» «some,» and «none» are combined with the ideas of «absolute perfection,» «relative perfection,» and «imperfection'to produce seven different conceptions of deity which are conveniently grouped into three broad types of theism: classical theism, within which God is conceived as absolutely perfect in all respects and in no way surpassable; atheistic views, in which there is no being which is in any respect perfect or unsurpassable; and the «new theism,» in which God is in some respects perfect and unsurpassable by others but is surpassable by himself.

You are probably the type that gives your children (god willing you had any) no hope or dreams, no gifts, no joy, and likely, no love.

«Now if one thinks this type of language is too strong, let him only remember that God the Warrior is simply the reverse side of God the Lover or of God the Redeemer... [Love] is power in action in a sinful world.

My humble advise to you is to go and study the history that how, when and who wrote these chapters and what type of time it went through and then say that if there is any statement in this book is the real time statements of Jesus PBUH... please be honest with yourself... and don't do anything to please others but only you... and make sure you are convince with this study... whats the difference btwn what is in this book and what was written in a book last year when a Hindu claim himself as God and millions believed in him and still they believe even after his death by being ill... no one asks if I take a human as my God then how could he be ill or eventually be dead?

Moreover, there is the «unique form of logical - type distinction» between «God and other things,» or, more exactly, «God and any other individual being» (144, 140).

Thus Hartshorne holds that the term «feeling,» for instance, can be said to be analogical in this sense because, or insofar as, it applies to all entities of the logical type of individuals, including the unique individual God, but does so in suitably different senses to all the different kinds or levels of individuals, with its sense being infinitely different in its application to God (1962, 140).

Though the details of Christian living are not neatly charted for us in the Sermon on the Mount or elsewhere, we are left in no doubt as to the type of character and action which God as seen in Jesus requires of us.

If you're the type of person who thinks «god's law» is a viable term, then you're the type who should consider it «god's hurricane» or «god's tornados» because of the terminology «act of god» to mean «natural disasters.»