Sentences with phrase «god sake do»

For God sake DO NOT talk about your past relationships.
But for god sake do not tell me Labours moving to the left because of course it's not.
This is the prob with the world 2day if u go 2 war u better have a good reason 4 it and 4 gods sake do nt give back everything uve conquered hell do nt leave ne survivors its all or nothing cause they will come back and bite u n the butt 4 sure thats a givn
Another name STEVE BOULD.What for gods sake does he do?Top Top defender in his day who is happy to be Wengers Poodle.I have lost all respect for someone who always put his body on the line for AFC and now sits there like the lapdog he has become.
@ Gunna shah 0k my bad he is taller but still arsenal concede a whole lot of goals last season so pls don «t talk about anyone getting the best of vamarlen he is part of the defence and for god sakes do nt mention djourou he has improved in inches am not abusing wenger the fact is Arsenal, have not won a single trophy in FIVE (5) years and the League in SIX (6) years that is the truth it hurts do nt» t it no one likes to hear the truth we all like promises and lies and thats what wenger have been feeding Arsenal fans i have nothing persona; l againt wenger but sh*t is Sh*t notice we are already in austria no new goalie i will be shocked if one comes in we wait and see.............
For gods sake don't let these people watch Lord of the Rings...
I am sure there would have to be a few additions and other subtractions as well, but for God sakes do we need Dennis Miller?
Call it an RS model or whatever you want but for god sakes don't take
And for Gods sake don't let Peta get ahold of them!
i do hope this is a great game but for gods sake do nt make more out of what we have seen, nothing that has been shown so far says it will be great when we / i actually see actual gameplay then we / i can then be impressed until then just wait.

Not exact matches

«how can you claim to know what he did» For argument's sake, how do you know that God did it as you said?
I know this because for all I may not understand about the mysteries of God or prayer or love or hate, I do know this: it is impossible to hate someone if you are sincerely praying to Almighty God for their sake.
And Luther answers: If it is really God, then He will crucify and torture you as He did Christ, your pattern, and thus leave you no reason to cling to Him except for His own sweet sake.
Do your rallying where it does the most good and for God sake, make your arguments about more then «so and so wants us to be poor» and «so and so just wants to be rich».
Verse 20, «Do not, for the sake of food [theology], destroy the work of God
«I know the Quran, and it teaches: Fight for the sake of God, do not exceed the bounds.
I love Allah and everyone I swear I want to see everyone who reads this in heaven, don't get mad do me a favor and please just like we Muslims respect ur book respect ours, go and find a Quran translated in English and read read at least the first 10 pages then listen to a reciter his name Is sheikh al maher al Miakli, then ask ur self why am I hear if u will not sacrifice for god (Allah) s sake why did he Jesus say or sins our forgiven and let us do whatever we want here without purpose and give us heaven.
God answered this vital question by sending His Son, Jesus, as the fulfillment of the most violent religious writings, to show us that He had nothing to do with the violence, but was instead dying along with us in the midst of the violence, taking our sin and suffering upon Himself, bearing our guilt and shame in His own being, all for the sake of those He loved.
«Thus Saith I, the Lionly Lamb of all the Gods and Goddesses of GOD and in the Aboveness of My Word are spoken the reverences of my Faith in the Lord and King of all the Gods and Goddesses, Christ Jesus, the redeemer of all the lost souls of lusts» concerns and even those of who did find in their smallness portions of eyeing benevolencies of varied understandings in the Gospels of the New Testaments being righteously divided for Fruitions» sakes.
But even if I do for the sake of argument, the assertion is that that morality is caused by god which is nothing but a claim.
Indeed, its two key principles — that knowledge should be pursued for its own sake rather than just when it is useful, and that knowledge is incomplete and distor ted if it doesn't include knowledge about God — are more relevant than ever in our consumerist and secularised age.
For the sake of those who do make the effort to attend, and as a reminder that the obligation to worship is imposed on us by God himself and is not subject to our convenience, it is my opinion that this universally unpopular change should be reversed forthwith.»
Well, for God and Jesus Christ's sake, get some balls and don't go to church if you don't want to!
On the other hand, if the concrete way this school does «have to do with God» is ordered to education for ministerial functions, is it not then in practice using «having to do with God» for a further, ulterior purpose («educating for ministerial functions»), thus corrupting its proper theological character («having to do with God for God's own sake»)?
Naturally I do not deny that the Holy Spirit may intervene and give direction to our action; but the possibility of the Spirit's intervention is no justification for rushing pell - mell into action, just for the sake of action; for yielding to some emotion, sentiment, visceral reaction, on the plea that «God will turn it to account» or, worse, in the conviction that this visceral reaction is tantamount to a divine commandment or a prophetic insight.
Presumably, as the word «theological» suggests, it is theological because in some way it has to do with God and, furthermore — since God is God — it has to do with God for God's own sake and not in order to «use» God to some further end.
The Christian God does not want to be absent for absence» sake, for as the Scriptures attest, the desire and the delight of Yahweh is to be with the children of men, to walk with them.
When God commanded Abraham to sacrifice his son Isaac, it was not just to see if Abraham was faithful enough to follow his commandment, it was also symbolic of the sacrifice God himself would make in sacrifice his beloved and begotten son, but unlike Abraham who was spared at the last moment from carrying through with the sacrifice of his son, God the father actually carried through with the sacrifice and although it wasn't permanent it still did not mean that there was no anguish, it doesn't matter how brief it was, if it was enough for divine and eternal beings to have to go through such heartache, all of which for our lowly sakes, in my view that is quite significant and I believe that such suffering is actually beyond mine or anyone else's comprehension.
In opposition to the blatant violation of human rights everywhere in the world, perhaps the faithful of all religious traditions will join together to do the will of God for the sake of all humanity.
Therefore, do not look upon others for Godly endurances sakes but dare to dream the dreamt dreams of a dreamer who sees Gods and Goddesses in their glorious wonders!
Now, assume with me for a second that God exists (I firmly believe He does) for the sake of argument.
In polite company, and for the sake of keeping peace with each other (because mutual apostasies take so much effort), we can do with marriage what we do with our disagreements about eucharist and baptism: keep our mouths shut and let God sort it out in the end.
The image of the cross remains central, but gets defined more as an act of mercy done for the sake of the oppressed than as an act of obedience to God's will.
But don't give up, FOR God's sake don't give up.
try to stick with the argument here... we are arguing for sake that God does exist..
I would rather be with the Lord Jesus, but for the unbelievers sake, I'll do all I can to show you that God not only loves you, but wants to heal you and give you life everlasting.
Hartshorne's theism, also, allows for the possibility that God might choose to sacrifice some particular interests for the sake of other more inclusive interests, and that such sacrifice does not imply that God fails to sympathize with the interests which are sacrificed (MVG 166).
But this letting go is not a denigration of God's world, nor should it be done for its own sake.
On the cross, Jesus reveals a God who does not cause others to suffer and die, but who suffers and dies Himself for the sake of others.
If people can't handle the «punishment» of a child, then do us all a favor and keep your legs closed for gods sake!
And He blots out the original sin for His own sake and will never think of it again (Isaiah 43:25), so the only thing on the record is everything good God did.
So God's gracious acts were said to be done for his name's sake (e.g..
For God's sake, do you people not think?
That Christianity has regarded and does regard him as God and Saviour has always appeared to me a fact of the highest importance which, for his sake and my own, I must endeavour to understand....
Jesus» teaching reprimand the corrupt uses of falsely justifying violence / killing and the evil in our nature that seeks violence for it's own sake, but He does not remove sound established theological truths and teach that God as we understand Him in the Old Testament (the one He calls Father) is false.
Although I prefer to think that for the sake of affirming the unity of all God's work, Wesley would have been willing to counter the dominant intellectual currents of our time, I know that I do not know.
It does not merely exist for the sake of humanity, but for its own sake and as witness to God and his benevolent activity of care.
you are getting into a very abusive relationship... For gods sake and yours don't turn on American idol
But for God's sake, don't exclude this object just because it is not a universally accepted symbol.
It was giving away our money and opening up our home and listening carefully to make sure anything we now did was actually born of following God and not out of our weird need to be a hero or to be different or to be radical for its own sake.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z