Sentences with phrase «god than science»

Not exact matches

Suffice it to say that Bill Nye has been around science and the scientific method first hand a lot more than Kan Ham has been talking to some god.

Science may never meet God, but the intelligent scientists are the ones who will find the truth sooner than others.

The possibility that «God» is nothing more than an ancient astronaut (alien) who might have created the first «adam» and «eve» in the garden of «eden» using genetics and something that we call... science.

God created Adam as a mature man, he did the same with the earth.how old is a mature earth?billions or trillions of years.a science maxim, things go from order to disorder.yet the complexities of man (DNA) and the earth (water) became complex over time.more than doubtful.

People who's theory is literally «god did it», have contributed more to science than you, though.

Many people do not marry in a church, even more (billions) do not celebrate the birth of Jesus, probably even more do not cry out to any gods, or may to other gods other than (yours), and many people consider life elsewhere in the universe because science and reason points to that possibility.

There is not one shred of truth from science to account for the presence of life upon the earth by any means other than a special creation by the great original first Cause - God - Who is life and the fountain source of all life!

A lot of believers in God have contributed more to science and our understanding of logic than me, too.

@ smrtaz — No, science plainly called «idolatry» in the «bible», because it advocates actually getting the answers, rather than blindly repeating «because «god» did it».

Apparently your God liked more babies dying but science had a heart and now birth mortality rates are higher than they have ever been in human history with fewer diseases and complications causing baby deaths.

, but God can, there are some of us who would rather live in hope than depend on Science for fulfilment of life's destiny.

Rather than owing a primary allegiance to the worship and service of God, theology is embroiled in the conflict between humanities and social - science orientations.

The sad truth is... atheists have no more of a chance to prove their belief with science than those that have faith in God.

L'Engle challenges us to imagine a God that is bigger, the creator and sustainer of a universe that, as modern science is revealing to us, is much more mysterious and complex than we generally suppose.

That fight was resolved in favor of the modernists who maintained that God's revelation is ongoing, that religion and science are not inherently irreconcilable, and that the tension between the two ought to elicit discussion and reflection rather than the abandonment of one subject or the other.

There are people who believe in God who actually demonstrate a better understanding of science, logic and reason than Lucifer's Evil Twin.

Those who believe that miracles are refuted by modern science may view them symbolically rather than literally, saying, for example, that the stilling of the storm (Mark 4:35 - 41) shows that God is with the believer in the storms of life.

Atheism is a religion, whose god is mankind, self, and science, through the power of reason, logic, and intellect, whose prophets are Darwin, Dawkins, and Hitchens, and whose disciples zealously seek converts with more passion and fervor than other religions.

Science doesn't have answers to everything, but at least it has WAY MORE PRACTICAL ANSWERS than your god.

to dandintac, the evolution of stars or solar systems or life forms to different species takes billons of years to complete., that we in our lifetime cant comprehend its teleology or purposefullness.At the University of Illinois, a super computer called The nautilus, predicts the future by analysing through computational methods mathematical algorithim the historical inputs for hundreds of years and discovered that it has a direction or intepreted as has a purpose.Someday in the future when we will be technologically advanced, Gods will will be clearly reveald to us.All of this will be part of his will, at this time beyond our comprehension, but will be in the future, The next generation of quantum computers which are tens of thousands more powerfull and faster than todays will provide us the informations to solidify the future religious faith based in science.

[1] Not only do God, angels and men think analogously but also men, sentient beings bound to knowledge by abstraction, approach various sciences in ways that are complementary rather than opposed.

Nor is God an unnecessary ornament added as a beautiful but superfluous extra onto the complete and subtle explanations offered by science, any more than Shakespeare is a superfluity to the play Hamlet.

Certainly Christian life, which is nothing other than the acceptance of the ineffable mystery of God as love, must be accomplished in the concrete details of earthly life, which is determined by the secular forces of science, of politics, of power and also of guilt.

You likely deny evolution and global warming for no other reason than it makes you uncomfortable and hold science to the impossibly high standard of having to explain every conceivable mystery about the natural World before you will accept it, but some moron at a pulpit doing magic hand signals of a Sundaymorning is enough to convince you he is communicating with some sky - god and turning grocery store bread and wine into flesh and blood.

I have great respect for what he did for science... I don't give a f» k about your understanding of god... that opinion is no better than any other BS position.

Science can no more prove or disprove God than it can the existence of free will or justice.

Science does not seek to disprove God any more than it tries to disprove Thor, or Odin, or the Flying Spaghetti Monster, or Zeus, etc..

Respectfully, as a religious scholar, I would have thought you to be more correct and honest in your representations of Christianity, but from the start, you seem more inclined to worship science and the mind than an Almighty God.

The new naturalism and science of the 17th century initially had the effect of restoring the vision of nature as good, orderly and benign — the arena of the manifestation of God's divine reason, rather than of the devil's malice.

It takes more faith to believe in God than to believe in science.

He who often thinks of God, will have a larger mind than the man who simply plods around this narrow globe... The most excellent study for expanding the soul, is the science of Christ, and Him crucified, and the knowledge of the Godhead in the glorious Trinity.

Both are theories and so by taking a stance that «science», i.e. the Big Bang was more believable because of your theory which is no more provable than the theory of a God was hypocritical, something you claim people who believe in God are.

A self - limiting God, the humble God of revelation, makes more sense within an evolutionary framework than in any others that have been proposed so far by science.

Especially, because they, with all the science can do no better of a job proving that there is not a God than a Faithful can to prove there is....

So, rather than believing in God because of our spiritual experiences, the fact that we have such experiences confirms and deepens what reason and science can lead us to believe, namely that God exists as a transcendent and

Real Christians Hate Religion... Real Christians Hate Hypocrites... Real Christians should be more like Christ... How could you claim to be a Christian if you don't even know your Christ... The reason why doomed people would never understand Christ is because they never tried to search for the Truth... They only listen to such rubbish things rather than the Truth... Read and do more and Talk less... It doesn't take a genius to know that Someone created you rather than you coming to life with just atoms randomly hitting each other... If you're really smart, think about it... Stop the non-sense talk about God and Science and find it out for yourself...

I'm not a GOPer Mathematicians and physicists believe in God at a significant higher percentile than do those in the life sciences.

If science and technology are ever to be liberated from tutelage to the dominative powers of history, if the drama is to be «interrupted» redemptively rather than destructively, then Christian theology, which has itself been enticed time and again to legitimate dominative power, can contribute to that future by mediating more dialectically to the present the subversive memories of God's identification with the struggles of victims everywhere in the mystery and message of Christ Jesus.

By asserting the process - theoretic foundations of our world, we can maintain both science and God and thus escape the materialist malaise - perhaps never better expressed than in this brief excerpt from a work held by many to be the greatest novel ever written:

... Science will piece together from it a far deeper and vastly wider apprehension of the wonder of God's creation than men two centuries ago could ever in their wildest fancies have guessed would be possible.9

Even when a man says that science led him to God, it was probably less a reasoned conclusion from the abstract symbols of technical knowledge than a total response to an experience of beauty, order, and reverence.

But if the world is founded on reason, wisdom and science, and is filled with orderly beauty, then it must owe its origin and order to none other than the Word of God.

The Church is no more the kingdom of God than natural science is nature or written history the course of human events.

Rather than assuming God, accepting scripture and deducing therefrom, science asked questions — not necessarily at random — and sought evidence.

Unfortunately, science has more pressing matters than spending its day, month, year explaining away coincidences like curing terminal illness which your god who is master of all creation created.

Now there is the possibility of a different philosophical attitude, one that takes with utmost seriousness the evolutionary and processive character of the world indicated by science, but at the same time affirms the reality of God as the supreme excellence and perfect goodness in and above (or more than) the world — in it, because such excellence and goodness is ceaselessly operative to further the world's development of potentialities; above it (or more than it), because such excellence and goodness is inexhaustible, more than merely creaturely, indefatigable, faithful, unfailing.

You said, «I pray the same for those who «believe» in science so that their knowledge and understanding would be used for God's glory rather than for their own shame.»

I pray the same for those who «believe» in science so that their knowledge and understanding would be used for God's glory rather than for their own shame.

So yes science is more reliable rather than looking at translations of translations of copies of translations of a book and merely saying «god did it».

I find it sad that he consistently needs to tell the world that there is no God just because he lacks the ability to believe in anything other than science and math.