Sentences with phrase «god than the universe»

Not exact matches

If the Fed is going to do God's work and save the universe from natural market forces, it will have to print even more money than last time around.

It takes more faith to believe that this universe and creation was created by accident than to believe that it is the devine work of God.

I was more devout than you yet I have yet to see any proof of your «god's» existence anywhere throughout the universe.

If you say God of the universe than it is just Him

The assertion that God had no beginning is no more plausible than the universe had no beginning.

No one says that — what they say are» - there is no room for God in explaining the universe, so that is not evidence for your god — prophesies are not proven to be more than coincidences, so that is not evidence for your god» etc. etGod in explaining the universe, so that is not evidence for your god — prophesies are not proven to be more than coincidences, so that is not evidence for your god» etc. etgod — prophesies are not proven to be more than coincidences, so that is not evidence for your god» etc. etgod» etc. etc..

yo the thing is not about believing or not, is the fact that if we don't believe then we are worthless living garbage who occupy a space in the universe only to create crap and pollution, in that kind of case we would better be recycled into some industrial material for a better use than eating and living like cattle, but if there is a god we acquire a divine status and a purpose to continue to exist beyond afterlife or at least the idea of it, which would give life a sense right?

I feel sure in my heart that the universe doesn't contain a god, so I guess I'm atheist, but I can't really claim certain knowledge any more than Christians can.

God is more than enough for me, and I thank him for creating the universe, and sending Jesus to die for our sins.

You say you will never see if you don't take your hands off your eyes and yet refuse to look at the world from any other perspective than your own Hebrew God derived universe and you will make or accept any excuse that allows you to keep believing you are right.

The simple fact is that if matter can neither be created or destroyed in a normal chemical reaction than how does the «god» come up with something out of nothing... remember matter CAN NOT be CREATED or DESTROYED, so if this god follows the normal physics and chemistry than it could not have created the universe either... it just exists b / c it exists..

It took God more days to create earth than the rest of the universe.

Many people do not marry in a church, even more (billions) do not celebrate the birth of Jesus, probably even more do not cry out to any gods, or may to other gods other than (yours), and many people consider life elsewhere in the universe because science and reason points to that possibility.

To believe that God created a mature universe and that everything was designed is actually easier to believe than to believe that everything just happened by chance, that matter just appeared from nothing and that present DNA was not designed.

And even though this universe is meticulously designed, God having infinite power did not exhaust or deplete any of His power to create it nor to sustain it, and rather than losing or wasting anything, this creation adds to His glory.

If there was a God who intelligently designed the universe and life then why would we have anything bigger than our solar system inhabited by single cell organisms?

If there is no God and the universe is a chance result of some great accident, then we are nothing more than bundles of chemicals and nothing matters.

But even if some force more intelligent than us was involved in the creation of our universe, it's still a huge leap from there to the Abrahamic God that self - satisfied early man.

Look at the world / universe and then decide if that is true or if you could have made the universe better than god did.

Your god sounds more like a petulant toddler than the omnipotent and omni - benevolent creator of the universe

Long ago, Edgerton noted that the Gita's theism «differs from pantheism... in that it regards God as more than the universe» (4:149).

And why should they not revere You, great [as is your] Self, more to be prized even than Brahman, first creator, Infinite, Lord of gods, home of the universe?

If we love God, then it does not take much for us to say yes because it is so much more fun in living with God than floating out there in the vast universe with no love for eternity.

I can not imagine there is not something «greater» than ourselves in the universe but do not call it God.

I am not crediting God, but I'd rather have a doctor who believes in something bigger than us all, than a cold atheist who doesn't have hope, or pray and isn't driven by anything in life other than a selfish belief that he is the most intelligent thing in the universe.

Any god that could have created this universe present a problem far greater than the «universe from nothing» problem.

You believe God did it, but you don't have a clue what he did, so in point of fact you don't know any more than any of us how the universe was created.

igaftr, yes you are right cats and all the animals in the world including you is part of the universe, eveything is God, it took Him 13.7 billion years for us to arrive what we are now, meaning the true reality of our existence, you are probably less than 50 years old, so how can you expect to equate yourself or pretend to understand Him, God Who is 13.7 billion years old.

L'Engle challenges us to imagine a God that is bigger, the creator and sustainer of a universe that, as modern science is revealing to us, is much more mysterious and complex than we generally suppose.

This full view of God lifts up a God who is more than a Creator who made the world out of nothing, more than the God of the big - bang theory who began the universe and then left it to run on its own -

In order to take possession of mc, my God, you who are so much more remote in your immensity and so much deeper in the intimacy of your indwelling than all things else, you take to yourself and unite together the immensity of the world and the intimate depths of my being: and I am conscious of bearing deep within me all the strain and struggle of the universe.

Glorious Lord Christ: the divine influence secretly diffused and active in the depths of matter, and the dazzling centre where all the innumerable fibres of the manifold meet; power as implacable as the world and as warm as life; you whose forehead is of the whiteness of snow, whose eyes are of fire, and whose feet are brighter than molten gold; you whose hands imprison the stars; you who are the first and the last, the living and the dead and the risen again; you who gather into your exuberant unity every beauty, every affinity, every energy, every mode of existence; it is you to whom my being cried out with a desire as vast as the universe, «In truth you are my Lord and my God.»

The body of God, then, would be nothing less than all that is — the universe or universes and everything they contain of which cosmologists speak.

Unless God is able to present himself a little more convincingly than in some often reinterpreted texts from 2000 years ago, I prefer to accept that the universe we observe is the one and only existance.

Nothing in the world is more intensely alive and active than purity and prayer, which hang like an unmoving light between the universe and God.

God who created the universe with those laws is no more their prisoner than the thief is prisoner of the laws of arithmetic.

«Many Christians still at bottom look upon God as one of the most selfish, self - absorbed Beings in the universe, far more selfish than they could think it right to be themselves, — intent only upon His own honor and glory, looking out continually that His own rights are never trampled on; and so absorbed in thoughts of Himself and of His own righteousness, as to have no love or pity to spare for the poor sinners who have offended Him.»

Similarly, God as the Ground of evolution is really the «Within» of the universe, its depth, if you will, more immanent to the universe than the universe is to itself, such that the universe is unthinkable apart from it, and yet, paradoxically, is not part of the universe.

At the Easter Vigil after the first reading from Genesis chapter 1, describing the creation of the universe by God, the prayer that follows says: «Almighty ever - living God, who are wonderful in the ordering of all your works, may those you have redeemed understand that there exists nothing more marvellous than the world's creation in the beginning except that, at the end of the ages, Christ our Passover has been sacrificed.»

Since God is present throughout his universe, he is near, and within us — literally «nearer than hands and feet.»

Those who think God can not mean well toward us because he «sends» us suffering can prove their point only by showing that there is a way to run the universe, compatible with the existence of other real powers than just the supreme power, which would be more fully in accord with the totality of interests, or by showing that God sends us the suffering while himself remaining simply outside it, in the enjoyment of sheer bliss.

Lastly, I can honestly admit that if proven wrong today, tomorrow, or in the future and someone gave me empiracle evidence that god exists, that gravity is not constant on earth, that the sun IS actually revolving around us and not the other way around, I would be more than happy to revise my current view of the universe around me and change accordingly.

But the most amazing thing to me is that there are people who think that the universe is too complicated to exist without having been created, and yet accept that there is a God who exists without having been created, and yet who is more complicated than the universe!

everything in the universe evolves, not only life forms but also memes, Religion is a meme so it also change in conformity to its era or time of its conception as faith.Because in pre scientific times thousands of years ago, the scientific method of approach or philosophy has not existed yet, myth or merely story telling is considered facts, The first religion called animism more than 10,000 years ago believed that spirits or god exists in trees, rivers, mountains, boulders or in any places people at that time considered holy.hundreds of them, then when the Greeks and Romans came, it was reduced to 12, they called it polytheism, when the Jews arrived, it was further reduced to 1, monotheism.its derivatives, Christianity And Islam and later hundreds of denominations that includes Mormonism and Protestants flourished up to today.So in short this religions evolved in accordance to the scientific knowledge of the age or era they existed.If you graph the growth of knowledge, it shows a sharp increase in the last 500 years, forcing the dominant religions at that time to reinterprete their dogmas, today this traditional religions are becoming obsolete and has to evolve to survive.But first they have to unify against atheism.in the dialectical process of change, Theism in one hand and the opposing force atheism in the other, will resolve into a result or synthesis.The process shall be highlighted in the internet in the near future.

Actually, that is how the ancient Hebrews thought the «universe» was structured and it would have made more sense for their God to make something so economical rather than a super vast, almost completely empty expanse with us just a tiny island.

Because God can be relegated to remote times and places and to ultimate causes, we would have to know a great deal more about the universe than we do now to be sure that no such God exists.»

those who have already decided that God does not exist and that all processes must have a naturalistic explanation, do not see the obvious evidence that the universe was designed, rather than happened by chance.

I find burnt toast to be great for a hangover, which is obviously proof that the judeo - christian god does indeed exist and created everything in the universe thousands of years ago in perfect order, even though there are trees older than the universe...

This evidence doesn't support your god's existence OR being the one actually start the universe any more than it proves Odin's, Quetzlcoatl's, Ra's, Kronos's, or Ahura Mazda's existence or claims of starting the universe.

Even if you can't bring yourself to call it «God,» it is undeniable that the cause, whatever it is, must be transcendent and preexistent, as it had to have existed before everything else in order to have caused everything else; it must be immaterial, as its existence preceded the existence of matter; it must be intelligent, as evidenced by the complexity of the universe it caused; and it must itself be uncaused, existing necessarily rather than contingently.