God died and the rush was on for mankind to find of his own kind those deemed worthy of portraying
the godhead for their moved beneficiaries populace sakes.
The Fall itself resulted from» man's abortive endeavor to seize
godhead for himself.
Not exact matches
Can you say why,
for example, you do not believe in Amaterasu or Vishnu or
Godhead?
The three Persons of the
Godhead are in perfect unity now and
for ever.
20
For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and
Godhead; so that they are without excuse: KJV August 21, 2011 at 10:50 am Report abuse Reply
The word «believeth» is used many times like in John 3:16, but the Bible never says a correct 100 % understanding of the
Godhead is necessary
for a person to be saved.
20
For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and
Godhead; so that they are without excuse: KJV
Although Christ is a Person of the
Godhead and yet in His days on earth the following statement was a valid one: «
For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the
Godhead bodily.
I dare say I know it far better than you... and have a much greater respect
for it than you have demonstrated since I do not worship it as a member of the
Godhead.
The Only witness (in flesh) of the Father (
For in Him dwells all the fullness of the
Godhead bodily)!
Here is the full stand alone post,
for context By the way, the former German foreign secretary Mr. Guido Westerwelle is just chastised by the
Godhead: He suffers from leukemia (cancer of the blood).
While Keen claims that this element is found in one's autobiography, Moltmann asserts that this beginning point is discovered in the universal cry
for freedom which extends even to the
Godhead.
John P. Meier writes (p. 140), «
For [Matthew] the church is the family of God, incorporated into the communal life of the
Godhead through baptism.»
-- Mao Tse Tung, Autotheist who successfully mythologized himself into the
Godhead position of his cult of personality (fixed that
for you)
Even God, I would argue, does not have a completely «free» will,
for He too is influenced by the Trinitarian
Godhead, by His creation, by His goal to glorify Himself, and by His own character.
The dissolution of this opposition takes place only when each form of the
Godhead, by virtue of its inherent independence, dissolves itself in itself: «Therefore that element which has
for its essence, not independent self - existence but simple being, is what empties and abandons itself, gives itself unto death, and so reconciles Absolute Being with its own self.»
Sunday worship is also an event
for those making a transition to life in the Spirit, since the trinitarian liturgy invites and provides
for an explicit experience of the presence of the
Godhead in the Spirit.
Prayers of adoration, praise, and thanksgiving
for the
Godhead in and of themselves may pass over the heads of most congregants.
If we allow Blake's apocalyptic vision to stand witness to a radical Christian faith, there are at least seven points from within this perspective at which we can discern the uniqueness of Christianity: (1) a realization of the centrality of the fall and of the totality of fallenness throughout the cosmos; (2) the fall in this sense can not be known as a negative or finally illusory reality,
for it is a process or movement that is absolutely real while yet being paradoxically identical with the process of redemption; and this because (3) faith, in its Christian expression, must finally know the cosmos as a kenotic and historical process of the
Godhead's becoming incarnate in the concrete contingency of time and space; (4) insofar as this kenotic process becomes consummated in death, Christianity must celebrate death as the path to regeneration; (5) so likewise the ultimate salvation that will be effected by the triumph of the Kingdom of God can take place only through a final cosmic reversal; (6) nevertheless, the future Eschaton that is promised by Christianity is not a repetition of the primordial beginning, but is a new and final paradise in which God will have become all in all; and (7) faith, in this apocalyptic sense, knows that God's Kingdom is already dawning, that it is present in the words and person of Jesus, and that only Jesus is the «Universal Humanity,» the final coming together of God and man.
Blake's vision is more consistently kenotic,
for it fully identifies God with the dark abyss or evil potency of the
Godhead even while unveiling the goal of this potency as being wholly redemptive.
Likewise a trinitarian liturgy offers the full blessing of the nurture of the
Godhead although some may be ready only
for the masculine or feminine role equivalents of God's parenting and partnering.
Romans 1:20
For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, [even] his eternal power and
Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
Romans 1:20 KJV
For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and
Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
«Both prophesy so
for the sake of the covenant between
godhead and manhood,
for the sake of the kingdom of God.»
And there is also Tillich's own theory: the resurrection really is a statement that the existential Jesus has become,
for those who have faith, the essential Christ in whom
Godhead and manhood are so united that existential human possibility has become essential manhood or humanity.
He who often thinks of God, will have a larger mind than the man who simply plods around this narrow globe... The most excellent study
for expanding the soul, is the science of Christ, and Him crucified, and the knowledge of the
Godhead in the glorious Trinity.
In that spirit, then, Dionysius could affirm that love, as applied to the
Godhead, «means a faculty of unifying and conjoining and of producing a special commingling together in the Beautiful and Good... and holds together things of the same order by a mutual connection, and moves the highest to take thought
for those below and fixes the inferior in a state which seeks the higher.»
The Emersonian mystic «consciousness of the divine life flowing through and around him, making him one with the
Godhead,» fought in him with the Calvinistic theocrat; and Calvin won; the new churchman, opening the doors of the sanctuary to all seekers after peace, contradicted in him the loyalist to ancient discipline,
for whom the company of the faithful was the selected band, the trained shock troops of the kingdom of God in a rebellious planetary province.
When,
for instance, the mystic is called upon to worship God, the meaning of the
Godhead and of worship is freshly perceived by the inner light.
ME II, Yes and no, this is what Henry Davis is referring to when he says «higher law of conscience» or Romans 1 states «
For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and
Godhead, so that they are without excuse...»
There is no more living expression
for the intensity with which this thought was thought than the
godhead of Mahayana — incessantly multiplying, always clothing itself in new manifestations, always descending anew into the world of men, always prepared
for new sacrifices.
It is comprehensible
for one thing, only if Jesus was and is pre-existent in the
Godhead before the Incarnation, and in that Reality of God knows, wills, and sees all His meaning and purpose in the world of men.
The way the Spirit is sent in time then gives the grounds
for understanding who He is and how He proceeds within the
Godhead.
Upon doing this, God shows his pleasure, and heaven shows it's honor, and the Holy Spirit demonstrates the triune
Godhead,
for all to know that this High Priest is the one who came to to forgive all sin.
For example, Thomas referred to the Faith and Order discussions on «Giving Account of our hope that is within us» where it is clearly affirmed that «the future of perfected humanity lies in the fullness of the
Godhead» beyond this side of history where sin and death prevail.
If what you interpret Paul as saying is that before creating all the myriad galaxies and star systems God decided that They would put some humans on the third planet from an insignificant star on a little arm of a middling galaxy and that the first hominids chosen role would be to perform pretty much to spec and do something silly and rebellious (arguably without sufficient information as to consequences
for themselves and their off spring, oh, and
for serpents) and cause affront to the tripartite
godhead warranting separation of Gods grace from all their offspring; then we are left with people being chosen from way back before the Big Bang to do some terrible things like killing babies or betraying Jesus who was chosen on the same non date (time didn't exist before creation) to die in a fairly nasty fashion and thereby appease the righteous wrath of himself and his fellow Trinitarians by paying a penalty as a substitute
for all future sins (of believers?)
Theological schools and pastoral initiatives came to dominate which, either in principle or in practice, downplayed the transcendent divinity and the incarnate authority of Christ as literal
Godhead made Man living in his Church as the source of truth and life
for humanity.
This does not mean, Jesus is a lamb that baas and eats grass, but it does mean, that Jesus is the Spotless lamb, that, the
Godhead determined, would be the ONE TIME Sacrifice
for ALL SINNERS.
25 His work was marred by a distinction between God and «
Godhead»: «God is deity conceived in relation, over against the universe, its cause or ground, it law and end; but the
Godhead is deity conceived according to His own nature, as He is from within and
for Himself.»
Not only does this view contradict the witness of Scripture (
for example, Jesus prayed to the Father while on earth); it also eliminates the possibility of relationship within the
Godhead.
«
For the invisible things of Him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are seen, namely, His eternal power and
Godhead.»
If the first century notions of a maternal spirit and an androgynous Jesus were indeed early teachings that the developing church subsequently rejected (
for whatever reasons), then a «balanced out» theology of the Christian
godhead, informed by psychological insights, has both «modern» relevance and «ancient» precedent.
From what I have read, the argument
for this apparent inconsistency is that Jesus» subordination to the Father relates to his role in the
Godhead, not his ontological status; meaning the Father and Son (and presumably the Spirit) are one and equal because Jesus» subordination somehow doesn't affect his being even though it is a position he takes and has taken and will take
for all eternity and can do no other.
They read this passage and that passage and say «Okay, Jesus says if you have seen him then you have seen the father also, so that means that over here where it says no one has seen the face of God then it must mean they are three parts of a triune
Godhead with a face but without a face, so that means blessings
for believers and torment
for the faithless...»
«It would, in effect, place within the
Godhead a neurotic element that can never serve as a solid presupposition
for the salvation of man.
(20)
For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and
Godhead; so that they are without excuse: (21) Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
All of the Collective's 2017 releases (such as Oh My
Godheads, Deadbeat Heroes, and Black The Fall) met with disappointing reviews, save
for one (Children of Zodiarcs).
The particulars of the case, something to do with a string of mysterious suicides precipitated by an Egyptian cult existing in Holmes - era London, aren't nearly as interesting as the lengths to which Spielberg and company go to make Homes «exciting»
for a mid-Eighties youth audience that mostly learned what they knew about popular entertainment from twin
godheads Spielberg and George Lucas.
The fashion
godhead is struggling to keep up with changes in haute couture, and there's no place
for Alma in his life except as a distraction.
Closing extras: a «live» performance by
Godhead (blecch) tied into a label's promo clip, cast - and - crew bios / production notes, DVD - ROM links to outtakes and web - exclusive footage, and a pair of booklets, one containing Berlinger's essay, the other a catalogue
for Blair Witch paraphernalia.