Sentences with phrase «goes against science»

faith goes against science itself; faith means no proof, in science without proof nothing is accepted to be fact (aka theory) as far as a god, which one?

and it fails now because its going against science and... common sense...

His quote in the article from last week was, «If you go against science, you're going to lose your kids.»

God's word does not go against science but your type of science goes against your own scientific rules.

Every time the church has went against science (e.g., the earth revolves around the sun) science has won.

I have a problem with people imposing their beliefs on others and saying «this is the way it is and there is no other way»... I have a big problem with creationists who go against science and the proof of evolution, but I also have a big problem with people demanding that there is no God on people when it is yet to be proved, and will probably never be proved, that there is in fact, not a God.

He has made me go against science hahaha

Because there are only two options: We can base the policy on the science or we can go against the science.

gbaikie, the radiant properties of a gas depend entirely on both the amount of GHGs and its temperature, so you went against the science with that statement that they don't.

Not exact matches

While the trained Velociraptors go against all rules of science, it is a good twist.

The irony being that he was threatened by the church for going against the whole «god did it» argument, which is what this guy was trying to claim, and has nothing to do with «real science»

See, I never thought that politicians should go up against science.

Unless the US wants even more funds going to religious schools and communities so as they can grow and cause more brick walls against the discoveries in science.

But, like Samuel Florman, who fears that «flights through cyberspace, however energizing they may be for the imagination, may weaken the objective rationality needed to do good engineering», I agree with Alan Cromer that the formal linear thinking needed to do science «goes against the grain of traditional human thinking, which is associative and subjective» (Florman 1994).

The difference seems to be that atheists are using science and logic and all believers have is a 2,000 - year - old book full of non-reproduceable stories that go against all the laws of physics.

Science is limited to the natural and by the natural it is nonsense to suggest otherwise as it goes against the foundations of what scieScience is limited to the natural and by the natural it is nonsense to suggest otherwise as it goes against the foundations of what sciencescience is.

as for science... nothing in the bIble goes against iot..

Strict creationism goes against everything science has found thus far.

Jeffrey Burton Russell points out that among historians of science «there's a strong debate going on between those who understand that the development of science is basically a Western European phenomenon, and that this is because of its Christian or Judeo - Christian roots, and those who maintain that religion blocked the progress of science until the 18th and 19th centuries, and that [science has] to struggle against religion.

In closing Bill Nye the Science Guy... you can not tell parents to go against and not teach their kids, the traditional beliefs that have been handed down from generation to generation because it goes against what you believe.

the fact that one needs faith is the problem... Reason Logic and Science are immediately thrown out the window you can not approach a subject without being objective, having faith is completely going against rationalism...

As far as I can tell, atheists promote all honest science, and indeed go so far as to protect it against bad and false interpretations of fact, such as creationism.

Yet, instead of believing in a Creator and Intelligent Design, you, the science and fact believer, go against the very basic rules of your same scientific beliefs and claim the Universe was NOT created, it just poofed into existence from nothing.

... GOD gave us BRAINS... to use... Therfore, those that deny truth and science, are actually going directly AGAINST GOD»S WISHES.

This goes to show you that when you put logic, science, and facts against religion, religion falls apart.

This hypothesis is extreme and goes against a rule in science the Ockham's Razor, which explains we should not multiply causes beyond what is necessary to explain effect.

Just as a Christian Science organization would have to provide insurance coverage for real medication, even though it goes against their beliefs, so are the Catholics now having to do so with contraception coverage.

At the same time, we think that science and public reason go against this belief.

Laughing — yet again you fail, you sit here and you tell me in one breath that i'm wrong in dealing with absolutes, Yet My whole point in the previous post was to point out that I can't blame science for killing Billions of people because they created the bombs and guns to do so... Just like you can't blame Christianity for people using violence against others, it's the people not the ideology that caused the violence, and i believe that... for whatever reason you apparently missed that and tried to make me sound like i honestly blame science for killing billions... so... maybe you need some reading and comprehension classes... i du n no, just would appreciate if you're going to argue with me, that you actually read my responses.

This is no rocket science and its such a disappointment people at the helm can't see that this would be the way to go both to salvage our season and to make us start competing against the big teams.

The public may recall that we issued a statement last night in which we announced that some of the girls at Government Girls Science Technical College (GGSTC) Dapchi who went missing after Boko Haram terrorists had stormed their school last Monday were rescued by officers and men of the Nigerian Army who are currently executing the war against the Boko Haram Insurgents.

In the scientific workplace, gossip may be especially risky, because gossip is almost always based on unverified information, which goes against the grain of basic scientific principles if not necessarily the science - workplace culture.

Many authors are loath to exclude reviewers because it goes against their ideal vision of what science should be about, he says: «Scientists like to believe that personal factors shouldn't play a role in science.»

The decision goes against a recommendation from the US National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB), which the US government has adopted as its official position.

And, by the same token, evidence that meets the rigorous demands of science is often discounted if it goes against what people want to believe, as illustrated by widespread dismissal of scientific evidence of climate change.

The other story from last year flagged by Science Committee leaders claimed that IARC omitted evidence that went against its conclusion that glyphosate likely causes cancer in humans and edited a draft review significantly before it was released to the public (Greenwire, 20 October, 2017).

He emphasises that scientific ideas go against common sense, which can make science very tough for nonscientists.

The winner of the May runoff will go up against Representative John Culberson (R — TX), the influential chairman of a panel that sets spending levels for NASA, the National Science Foundation, and several other science agScience Foundation, and several other science agscience agencies.

«I would never go against what was given to me by my administration,» she says, referring to the prescribed science curriculum.

«We were pretty convinced that we were going to find that business did have an advantage, but, when going head - to - head against these citizen groups, government officials and other groups that represent occupational interests, business has no inherent advantage,» said Marie Hojnacki, associate professor of political science, Penn State.

But finally they just wore down the moderates on the board, and they ended up with a standard to replace that old, bad strength - and - weaknesses one that been used against evolution with a phrase that is still going to be used to beat up the publishers, still going to be used to try to get evolution taught as bad science in the state of Texas.

Most people who get their information online would probably just follow a link straight to the piece, and would assume that it accurately describing how real science goes against Kyoto, etc..

The scientist has published numerous papers that go against mainstream climate science.

The policies and organization that Jim Stowers initiated clearly go against all the serious problems for science at universities.

I mean this goes against the vast majority of recent science.

The recommendation «based on science» clearly goes against what we think we understand from the science suggesting a WFPB diet gives us all the best nutrition.

(That 10 percent thing is not true, but if you're the sort of wet blanket who picks movie science apart with dogged determination, you should probably get a restraining order against Lucy, because it's only going to cause you indigestion.)

In «The Belko Experiment,» the why turns out to be social science, much like the 1961 Milgram experiment on obedience to authority figures, which explored individual willingness to go against personal moral conscience in obeying commands.

Ravitch not only provides the evidence of the falsity of these claims and reforms, she also discusses how current education rhetoric and policy are damaging our public schools, our communities, our democracy and most importantly, our children; how these policies go against everything our founders intended public education to be and everything science knows about child development.

We're going to help teachers understand where pressure against climate science education comes from, as the first step in helping them construct a response.