Sentences with phrase «goes against the forcings»

Despite the fact that both the models and the YD hypothesis indicate changes in heat transport can affect the global temperature, and in the case of the YD so dramatically temperatures go against the forcing trend, you are steadfast in your beliefs that it is impossible that any long term trend in heat transport can be affecting modern climate.

Negative feedback goes against the forcings of the system a while back in time.

Not exact matches

In doing so, he goes up against Kylo Ren (Adam Driver) using the force in an extremely clever way.

A few years into the wars, American and coalition forces started to realize the twentieth century military mechanism wasn't going to work against a dangerous, dynamic and vastly decentralized enemy.

But that doesn't change the fact that in any bid that forces it to go up against Amazon or Facebook, the odds are stacked against it.

Inflation is too powerful of a force to go against.

The rule, which will go into effect for new accounts in about eight months, will not prohibit individual forced arbitration — meaning individual consumers (as opposed to groups of consumers) could still be be blocked from going to court against financial firms.

forced arbitration — meaning individual consumers (as opposed to groups of consumers) could still be be blocked from going to court against financial firms.

Uprooted trees and widespread flooding blocked many highways and streets across the island, creating a maze that forced drivers to go against traffic and past police cars that used loudspeakers to warn people they must respect a 6 p.m. to 6 a.m. curfew imposed by the governor to ensure everyone's safety.

The reason why governments are forced to go against the idea of a cryptocurrency is due the decentralization it provides to

«We've had a lot of internal debate about this since the beginning: The approach to resist Amazon as a force and see how we can go head - to - head against it,» said Daehee Park, Tuft & Needle's co-founder.

Other forces on the left have gone further, asking that they, not Trump, get the credit for the turn against the TPP — and pointing out that by the end, it was Republicans in Congress who wanted it passed.

BUT... if the Church is going to claim and treat sexual deviance (if in fact that is what they believe it is) with such force over and against all other indiscretions, how do they justify that... and how isn't it hypocritical of them when they simply wink at other things that are clearly outlined by Jesus» own words as grievous.

The primary issue is we have a sitting president in Obama, who through his executive order is forcing a directiive that goes against religious freedoms.

What she should have expected is to not have been forced to wear a ridiculous red santa hat if it goes against her faith.

Two comments.One, the atheist / materialist claims that he / she... «Did «nt believe in free will»... O.K.Should we take that to mean some mindless, heretofore unknown force apllied those words in your behalf?Did someone put the proverbial «gun to your head «and force you to post your comments?we await you presumably forced answer with bated breath.Two.As for Mr.Gingrich, beware.Politics aside, the one question yet remains for Calista: How did you, a professed «devout «Roman Catholic, carry on a 6 - year affair with a man you knew was married?How does that square with the Biblical prohibition against committing adultery?Oh wait!I know!As a «devout «Roman Catholic you can sin with impunity; just go to your priest, say a couple of «hail Marys and Our Fathers», ask the priest to bless your sinning, and resume.Of course!I had forgetton how easily Catholics excuse their trangressions (ex opere operato, anyone).

Naturally, such tendencies go against the grain of the structure and the new productive forces not only permit but indeed demand their reversal.)

Employees also pay as well, of course, but what we have here is a company, under the policies approved not just be the CEO but by the board, that is being forced to pay for something that goes against their beliefs.

Since many people think Paul is talking about who goes to heaven in Romans 9, they think it is unfair for God to force Pharaoh to go to hell against his will.

@The One True Steve «If God allows free will, then you are going against God by forcing your will on someone else»

Requiring us as a Church to be forced to participate in covering birth control plans that go against our fundamental belief.

If God allows free will, then you are going against God by forcing your will on someone else.

That male priests should not be celibate — that forces them to go against nature and lie to themselves everyday.

When you can answer the question I posed as to how you are going to force a woman to give birth against her will without removing her rights guaranteed to her by law, please do so.

There is a power of brute force which is going to be wielded by someone, and it had better be retained by the conscientious and intelligent as a last resort against the unscrupulous who would, if not thus restrained, gladly accept it as their monopoly.

Instead of behaving in a professional manner, our military invaded Iraq with far too small a force; failed to respond adequately when parts of the Iraqi Army (and Baathist Party) went underground; tolerated an orgy of looting and lawlessness throughout the country; disobeyed orders and ignored international obligations (including the obligation of an occupying power to protect the facilities and treasures of the occupied country — especially, in this case, Baghdad's National Museum and other archaeological sites of untold historic value); and incompetently fanned the flames of an insurgency against our occupation, committing numerous atrocities against unarmed Iraqi civilians.

You are forcing Catholic organizations to provide coverage (and pay for) something that goes against the very fiber of our faith.

He can NOT force you to go against your will otherwise it is not truly free will.

But when we go beyond this and take our own religious experience into account, as we must inevitably do, are we not forced, even against our will perhaps, to acknowledge not only that we recognize the fact that God is known in a distinctive way within the Christian community, but also that we have trusted ourselves to God as thus known; that God - as - thus - known is our God?

One day she was cooking in the kitchen and the spirits took her over against her will, forced her into a trance and the whole kitchen went up in flames.

I was going to be killed by my own hands against my will but my defiant will to overcome this evil force prevailed, I waged a mind war over it and my desperation led me to ask help from God.

Crimes against Copts continue to go unpunished, and there is still «forced displacement, harassment under the country's anti-blasphemy laws, kidnappings and physical assaults.»

Chair of the Accord Coalition, Rabbi Dr Jonathan Romain, said: «Accord is regularly made aware of qualified teachers who are excluded from jobs at faith schools, including serving members of staff who are forced to leave their post for behaviour deemed to go against a school's religious tenants, such as for seeking a divorce.

It still doesn't negate the fact that the RCC has religious beliefs and is being FORCED by the government to go against them.

If they were a medical necessity I'd support the move, but since abstinence is a choice there's no reason to force them to go against their beliefs and pay for birth control when alternatives exist.

In recent years, evangelicals have pushed for greater «conscience protections» for Christians, hoping to keep believers from being forced to go against their beliefs on marriage and sexuality at their workplaces.

I am Greek Orthodox and as such we do believe in birth control, but to force the Catholic Church to go against its beliefs is against Freedom of Religion in our country After giving over 1,200 waivers this administration chose to force the Catholic Church to follow its regulations is irrational.

But I tell you, Do not defend yourselves against injury; whoever strikes you on the right cheek, offer him the other; whoever goes to law with you about your cloak, give him your coat also; whoever forces you for a mile, go two with him.»

It wouldn't matter what the mandate was about, the fact is that for the first time in American history, the government is forcing religions to go against it's own faith.

No one is forcing you to work for a Catholic Hospital, just as the Islamic Students are filing a law suit against a Catholic University because of their religious images, then why would you go there if your Islamic?

The Government is forcing the church to go against their beliefs.

You can not force a religion to go against their belief, no should any president be allowed to do so.

If their beliefs are against contraception then providing them for their employees is forcing them to go against their beliefs, it's simple.

Fine then stop giving them tax dollars again all this will do is force them to close because they will not go against their beliefs, which means less health care available which we are going to need desperately.

Christian martyrs went against their government and allowed themselves to be killed not for reward, but because they were forced to choose between denying God or denying their life, and they chose God over their life.

Also I have no problem with catholics going against the teachings of their church, but it's a whole different issue to force leaders in the church to provide what is contradictory to their own teachings.

In order to argue against the seventeenth century's view that compound bodies are not real substances, Leclerc is forced to go beyond Leibniz, however.

Liberals are the ones that are forcing religious organizations to pay for contraception for women even if it goes against their faith.

He supposedly created you and knows what you're going to do, including adam and eve who he knew would eat the apple of sin, then condemns you with that sin, then forces you to beg him to save you from his wrath against you from that sin.

It is NOT right for the government to force ANYONE to go against their beliefs.