This goes against the views of many Republican congressmen — as well as the party platform — who largely oppose action on climate change.
Not exact matches
The pain that this start up is aiming to solve is the one that many of us have experienced, the terrible process of
going to an apartment
viewing only to battle
against 100 other applicants.
Some conservatives tried to fight back
against Trump, pleading with their audiences to see what they contended to be the rational point of
view, but their arguments seemed to
go unheard.
To make sure we give the broadest possible
view of program quality, then, we've stacked our rankings up
against those published by other major organizations and broken down which factors
go into each.
Internally, Bannon was his biggest defender
against skeptics who accused him of holding anti-Semitic
views and playing up his intellectual status by insisting on
going by «Dr. Sebastian Gorka.»
Your statement that «all the comments on this subject (concerning atheists) do not come from happy people... who despise, are upset, have nothing, are not thankful and... have nothing to live for»
goes against the very way that both Jesus and the apostles taught when speaking with individuals who do not share their
view.
It is time for those who practice metaphysics consciously and rigorously to
go on the offensive
against the erroneous metaphysics of most of those who presuppose particular
views without examining them.
Their hierarchy has always been the major source of embarrassment for the Church... dating back to the little fiasco with Galileo (which took them 400 years to finally acknowledge)... up to the current scandals... along with their current
views on gays (which, like Galileo,
goes against the empirical data now known).
viewing Marxist - Leninist communism as somehow disparate from atheism is also wishful thinking and
goes against virtually all critical analysis.
Against this
view, Iris Murdoch and others have used the insights of psychology and literature to focus on the common experience in which two people looking at an event see totally different things
going on.
This is basic common sense, and is fine as far as it
goes, but it does not explain why pro-life advocates would struggle
against easy access to abortion when they are not being personally oppressed by it, or why some men would hold pro-choice
views when they can not become pregnant.
(d) Scaring people into NOT using condoms, based upon his disdainful and aloof
view that it is better that a person die than
go against the Vatican's position on contraceptive use.
Spurred by their recent condemnation of Rob Bell, I was
going to rail
against their narrow
view of Orthodoxy, challenge their commitment to Christian unity, judge them for being so judgmental, and then throw a bunch of Bible verses around like Rambo in a last - ditch siege.
That analogy isn't quite the same because what resulted for Jesus» followers was a very different theological
view; one that
went against their Jewish expectations.
This
view of Samuel
goes naturally hand in hand with a totally negative judgment of the monarchy, a judgment which regards it as a grave mistake perversely instituted by sinful Israel
against the will of Yahweh and contrary to the judgment of Samuel.
even your post is an opinion, it could be
viewed and inciting hatred towards someone's religious belief, which
goes against the first amendment and basic right of any amercan.
Although their language would sound quaint today, a dualistic
view of human nature torn by the lure of the flesh
against the spirit has simply
gone underground.
The question is, once this sexual - orientation structure collapses, what will come to replace it: the queer theorists» nihilistic anything -
goes ethic, or the classical Christian
view from which all of this is a departure, the
view that takes the marital - procreative as its end and organizing principle, evaluating passions
against nature rather than vice versa?
«But technical expertise,» they
go on to note, «is no proof
against bizarre beliefs,» and they cite as evidence people who have a
view of creation that differs from evolutionary dogma despite their «backgrounds in engineering or other technical subjects.»
Plus, within the
view of most Christians, atheists have an inferior value system, so it should be no surprise that they are rude, but on the other hand, Christianity has a «superior» value system and rudeness generally
goes against that value system.
Feel free to provide an example from Augustine's works that you feel
goes against Calvinistic / Augustinian
views of election, and I can probably show this.
In order to argue
against the seventeenth century's
view that compound bodies are not real substances, Leclerc is forced to
go beyond Leibniz, however.
Critical Zionist thinkers, however, have maintained that the official Zionist movement in effect adopted Jabotinsky's
views when it decided in 1942 to
go all out for a Jewish national state to be established and maintained
against all opponents by whatever means were necessary.
Many of my
views seem to
go against my faith, as far as common beliefs, but I believe in God and believe in Jesus, so I think I still fit the definition of a Christians
i just
viewed a piece by you that totally
went against what you preached in the zimerman case hold your thoughts to murrow
As the Pope still has significant influence over the less educated masses in these parts of the World, he has exercised this power by: (a) Using some of the Vatican's incomprehensible wealth to educate these vulnerable people on health family planning and condom use; (b) Supporting government programs that distribute condoms to high risk groups; (c) Using its myriad of churches in these regions to distribute condoms; or (d) Scaring people into NOT using condoms, based upon his disdainful and aloof
view that it is better that a person die than
go against the Vatican's position on contraceptive use.
Now I know there will be many out there who will say this is a negative
view and that you should NEVER take that stance
against your own club, but as well as being a dyed in wool Arsenal fan, I'm also a devout realist and finally the truth has sunk in with me, and I know in my heart of hearts that this season is
going to be the longest and toughest many of us have experienced in an age.
Of course I am biased towards Arsenal, it comes with the territory, but I do try to see things from all points of
view and I know that i have a tendency to ignore the things that
go in our favour, like the terrible offsuide decision
against Berahino when we played
against West Brom the other day.
Depending on your point of
view Wenger is living in hope that Coquelin is good enough or he's showing loyalty to his players by giving them a chance or maybe it
goes against his principles to spend money like LVG and Mourinho.
And for Thierry O'henry in particular, his I too known when he joined the Sky Sports TV football punditry on which he has resorted to be making anti-Arsenal
views and damaging opinions
against Le Prof from there must have made Le Prof not to
go further length with him as a coach for Arsenal.
If the manager now thinks that he's put paid to his detractors by pulling off a feat
against Spurs, and surrounds himself in the comforts of that one performance and
goes back to the «business as usual» approach like at Watford and Stoke, and......... some of the players also take that
view.
Looking at things from an Arsenal point of
view I definitely agree with Arsene Wenger's suggestion that the penalty awarded
against the Gunners today was a soft one and that Moussa Dembele was looking for it when he ran into the box and into three Arsenal players that he was never
going to get past.
Maybe lineups should be
viewed in light of possible defensive shift mixes as much as pitcher handedness and nominal position, especially with starters
going fewer innings (making platoon splits
against the opposing starting pitcher less important).
When someone gets caught doing it, we
go through the typical (and depending on your
views, justifiable) rage -
against - the - rule - and - rulemakers response.
You forgot Perez in attack but then again, no wonder you missed him out, he was a new signing and
goes against your ignorant point of
view.
All we have to do is beat Stoke at home... I'm
going to
go with the optimistic
view and say a team with the most chances so far but atrocious finishing has a great chance to buck the recent trend
against a team with a 2 loss, 2 draw record.
Josef Martinez's first game
against NYCFC didn't
go as planned, and in the aftermath of his essentially anonymous performance, there's some dividing opinions on how to
view the performance among Atlanta United fans.
Daws
went walkabout, Gallas got back goalside just to admire the
view, Dembele made a valiant scramble but failed to get it safe, and only Kyle had the nous to actually * defend *) he made some huge contributions and looked a real leader at the back (likewise
against the Hammers)... And just a few weeks ago he looked like he'd lost his mojo.
Klopp has spoken already about different tactics and will be looking to be able to tweak options to make us more unpredictable — in this sense then Origi and Sturridge should not be
viewed as back - ups because that presupposes they are not
going to play unless we want to rest Firmino when all that we have heard so far is that Klopp wants different options — I'm not sure that at home
against lowly opposition that Firmino's subtleties are the best way to break down the door — equally a conventional striker
against an elite team may not be the best ploy
With the way their last two games
against Inter have
gone and knowing they had a 3 - 0 aggregate lead in their back pocket, it's understandable that Juventus maybe didn't
view this game with the usual bite and fervor as previous ones.
To tell women that their choices, even ones
viewed as «traditional» or «selfless» in nature, are «wrong» and «anti-feminist» just because they don't look like a giant middle finger to the patriarchy, is to
go against everything feminism stands for.
All scientifically backed but
going against mainstream
views about what your baby «should» get into themselves.
Professor Robin Lovell - Badge, head of the genetics division at the Medical Research Council's National Institute For Medical Research, added: «Maybe there's an awful lot in the bill that
goes against the strict Roman Catholic
view and it's not just these mixtures of animal and human they object to.
Jay: «Yes, but he wasn't
going to share News Corps
views given to him privately with the coalition (
against the takeover).»
As leader, Tim must unite this spectrum in the eyes of the electorate, with a clear coherent message about our values, even if it means occasionally being counterintuitive to his own
views and having to
go against the grain of populism.
He told the Guardian: «There are quite a lot of Labour MPs who will take the
view that if I'm
going to rebel
against the government, today is not the day to do it.»
While I get the sentiment in some ways, this is an unhealthy
view, pitting «being the church» and «
going to church»
against each other.
If your defense
against a policy is «Putin does it too», that's not
going to be
viewed as a great defense in most of the Western world.
The assertion about the huge financial involvement in my
views is in order but may not be completely correct, as the argument was not only sophistry but antithetical to building a nation devoid of corruption and
goes against the global warning on corruption as succulently pointed out.
He said: «In our experience once a reservation is in place, it tends to stay there even when the UN monitoring bodies, parliamentary committees and civil society organisations are united in the
view that it's unnecessary and
goes against the object and purpose of the treaty.»