Sentences with phrase «goes against you views»

This goes against the views of many Republican congressmen — as well as the party platform — who largely oppose action on climate change.

Not exact matches

The pain that this start up is aiming to solve is the one that many of us have experienced, the terrible process of going to an apartment viewing only to battle against 100 other applicants.

Some conservatives tried to fight back against Trump, pleading with their audiences to see what they contended to be the rational point of view, but their arguments seemed to go unheard.

To make sure we give the broadest possible view of program quality, then, we've stacked our rankings up against those published by other major organizations and broken down which factors go into each.

Internally, Bannon was his biggest defender against skeptics who accused him of holding anti-Semitic views and playing up his intellectual status by insisting on going by «Dr. Sebastian Gorka.»

Your statement that «all the comments on this subject (concerning atheists) do not come from happy people... who despise, are upset, have nothing, are not thankful and... have nothing to live for» goes against the very way that both Jesus and the apostles taught when speaking with individuals who do not share their view.

It is time for those who practice metaphysics consciously and rigorously to go on the offensive against the erroneous metaphysics of most of those who presuppose particular views without examining them.

Their hierarchy has always been the major source of embarrassment for the Church... dating back to the little fiasco with Galileo (which took them 400 years to finally acknowledge)... up to the current scandals... along with their current views on gays (which, like Galileo, goes against the empirical data now known).

viewing Marxist - Leninist communism as somehow disparate from atheism is also wishful thinking and goes against virtually all critical analysis.

Against this view, Iris Murdoch and others have used the insights of psychology and literature to focus on the common experience in which two people looking at an event see totally different things going on.

This is basic common sense, and is fine as far as it goes, but it does not explain why pro-life advocates would struggle against easy access to abortion when they are not being personally oppressed by it, or why some men would hold pro-choice views when they can not become pregnant.

(d) Scaring people into NOT using condoms, based upon his disdainful and aloof view that it is better that a person die than go against the Vatican's position on contraceptive use.

Spurred by their recent condemnation of Rob Bell, I was going to rail against their narrow view of Orthodoxy, challenge their commitment to Christian unity, judge them for being so judgmental, and then throw a bunch of Bible verses around like Rambo in a last - ditch siege.

That analogy isn't quite the same because what resulted for Jesus» followers was a very different theological view; one that went against their Jewish expectations.

This view of Samuel goes naturally hand in hand with a totally negative judgment of the monarchy, a judgment which regards it as a grave mistake perversely instituted by sinful Israel against the will of Yahweh and contrary to the judgment of Samuel.

even your post is an opinion, it could be viewed and inciting hatred towards someone's religious belief, which goes against the first amendment and basic right of any amercan.

Although their language would sound quaint today, a dualistic view of human nature torn by the lure of the flesh against the spirit has simply gone underground.

The question is, once this sexual - orientation structure collapses, what will come to replace it: the queer theorists» nihilistic anything - goes ethic, or the classical Christian view from which all of this is a departure, the view that takes the marital - procreative as its end and organizing principle, evaluating passions against nature rather than vice versa?

«But technical expertise,» they go on to note, «is no proof against bizarre beliefs,» and they cite as evidence people who have a view of creation that differs from evolutionary dogma despite their «backgrounds in engineering or other technical subjects.»

Plus, within the view of most Christians, atheists have an inferior value system, so it should be no surprise that they are rude, but on the other hand, Christianity has a «superior» value system and rudeness generally goes against that value system.

Feel free to provide an example from Augustine's works that you feel goes against Calvinistic / Augustinian views of election, and I can probably show this.

In order to argue against the seventeenth century's view that compound bodies are not real substances, Leclerc is forced to go beyond Leibniz, however.

Critical Zionist thinkers, however, have maintained that the official Zionist movement in effect adopted Jabotinsky's views when it decided in 1942 to go all out for a Jewish national state to be established and maintained against all opponents by whatever means were necessary.

Many of my views seem to go against my faith, as far as common beliefs, but I believe in God and believe in Jesus, so I think I still fit the definition of a Christians

i just viewed a piece by you that totally went against what you preached in the zimerman case hold your thoughts to murrow

As the Pope still has significant influence over the less educated masses in these parts of the World, he has exercised this power by: (a) Using some of the Vatican's incomprehensible wealth to educate these vulnerable people on health family planning and condom use; (b) Supporting government programs that distribute condoms to high risk groups; (c) Using its myriad of churches in these regions to distribute condoms; or (d) Scaring people into NOT using condoms, based upon his disdainful and aloof view that it is better that a person die than go against the Vatican's position on contraceptive use.

Now I know there will be many out there who will say this is a negative view and that you should NEVER take that stance against your own club, but as well as being a dyed in wool Arsenal fan, I'm also a devout realist and finally the truth has sunk in with me, and I know in my heart of hearts that this season is going to be the longest and toughest many of us have experienced in an age.

Of course I am biased towards Arsenal, it comes with the territory, but I do try to see things from all points of view and I know that i have a tendency to ignore the things that go in our favour, like the terrible offsuide decision against Berahino when we played against West Brom the other day.

Depending on your point of view Wenger is living in hope that Coquelin is good enough or he's showing loyalty to his players by giving them a chance or maybe it goes against his principles to spend money like LVG and Mourinho.

And for Thierry O'henry in particular, his I too known when he joined the Sky Sports TV football punditry on which he has resorted to be making anti-Arsenal views and damaging opinions against Le Prof from there must have made Le Prof not to go further length with him as a coach for Arsenal.

If the manager now thinks that he's put paid to his detractors by pulling off a feat against Spurs, and surrounds himself in the comforts of that one performance and goes back to the «business as usual» approach like at Watford and Stoke, and......... some of the players also take that view.

Looking at things from an Arsenal point of view I definitely agree with Arsene Wenger's suggestion that the penalty awarded against the Gunners today was a soft one and that Moussa Dembele was looking for it when he ran into the box and into three Arsenal players that he was never going to get past.

Maybe lineups should be viewed in light of possible defensive shift mixes as much as pitcher handedness and nominal position, especially with starters going fewer innings (making platoon splits against the opposing starting pitcher less important).

When someone gets caught doing it, we go through the typical (and depending on your views, justifiable) rage - against - the - rule - and - rulemakers response.

You forgot Perez in attack but then again, no wonder you missed him out, he was a new signing and goes against your ignorant point of view.

All we have to do is beat Stoke at home... I'm going to go with the optimistic view and say a team with the most chances so far but atrocious finishing has a great chance to buck the recent trend against a team with a 2 loss, 2 draw record.

Josef Martinez's first game against NYCFC didn't go as planned, and in the aftermath of his essentially anonymous performance, there's some dividing opinions on how to view the performance among Atlanta United fans.

Daws went walkabout, Gallas got back goalside just to admire the view, Dembele made a valiant scramble but failed to get it safe, and only Kyle had the nous to actually * defend *) he made some huge contributions and looked a real leader at the back (likewise against the Hammers)... And just a few weeks ago he looked like he'd lost his mojo.

Klopp has spoken already about different tactics and will be looking to be able to tweak options to make us more unpredictable — in this sense then Origi and Sturridge should not be viewed as back - ups because that presupposes they are not going to play unless we want to rest Firmino when all that we have heard so far is that Klopp wants different options — I'm not sure that at home against lowly opposition that Firmino's subtleties are the best way to break down the door — equally a conventional striker against an elite team may not be the best ploy

With the way their last two games against Inter have gone and knowing they had a 3 - 0 aggregate lead in their back pocket, it's understandable that Juventus maybe didn't view this game with the usual bite and fervor as previous ones.

To tell women that their choices, even ones viewed as «traditional» or «selfless» in nature, are «wrong» and «anti-feminist» just because they don't look like a giant middle finger to the patriarchy, is to go against everything feminism stands for.

All scientifically backed but going against mainstream views about what your baby «should» get into themselves.

Professor Robin Lovell - Badge, head of the genetics division at the Medical Research Council's National Institute For Medical Research, added: «Maybe there's an awful lot in the bill that goes against the strict Roman Catholic view and it's not just these mixtures of animal and human they object to.

Jay: «Yes, but he wasn't going to share News Corps views given to him privately with the coalition (against the takeover).»

As leader, Tim must unite this spectrum in the eyes of the electorate, with a clear coherent message about our values, even if it means occasionally being counterintuitive to his own views and having to go against the grain of populism.

He told the Guardian: «There are quite a lot of Labour MPs who will take the view that if I'm going to rebel against the government, today is not the day to do it.»

While I get the sentiment in some ways, this is an unhealthy view, pitting «being the church» and «going to church» against each other.

If your defense against a policy is «Putin does it too», that's not going to be viewed as a great defense in most of the Western world.

The assertion about the huge financial involvement in my views is in order but may not be completely correct, as the argument was not only sophistry but antithetical to building a nation devoid of corruption and goes against the global warning on corruption as succulently pointed out.

He said: «In our experience once a reservation is in place, it tends to stay there even when the UN monitoring bodies, parliamentary committees and civil society organisations are united in the view that it's unnecessary and goes against the object and purpose of the treaty.»