Not exact matches
After all, the thinking
goes, in the long run humanity's spiking numbers and appetites are bound to hit a wall
on a
planet with
finite resources and a limited capacity to absorb our effluents.
With the 704th post
on this exploration of ways to mesh infinite human aspirations with life
on a
finite planet, I'm taking a break to pick some backyard blackberries (video above; watch in HD mode),
go camping
on a beach in eastern Long Island and «review the bidding,» as my colleague and friend Cornelia Dean likes to say.
One imperative,
going forward, was nicely captured by David Roberts of Grist in a Twitter riff earlier this week that, despite our differences
on how to address the buildup of greenhouse gases, resonates powerfully with my views
on how to foster progress
on a
finite, crowding and urbanizing
planet:
As long as we live
on a
finite planet, however, that ain't gonna happen.
Does anyone at all in conventional economics and the broader community realise that growth can not
go on forever in a
finite land or
on a
finite planet?
To what extremes are we willing to
go, to fit more and more people and bigger and bigger economies
on a
finite planet?