Sentences with phrase «good article because»

It's a good article because it sounds like Ron learned all of them from experience.

This is an especially good article because of the timing.

It's a good article because it is well - thought out, and pokes at an insipid phrase «behind the curve.»

this is a good article because it makes everybody think how the Internet has taken over our lives making it easy to meet others, not only in dating, but in business, etc..

This is a good article because it gives an insight to arsenes thinking.

Not exact matches

I wrote a separate article on the topic of delegation where the simple rule is that if someone can do a job 70 % as good as you can, you should delegate it because you get 70 % of the output using almost none of your time.

I willingly put that ecommerce article in a ~ 5 PM slot because it was an excellent piece for our clients — and that might have helped nurture our following better than anything else I could have chosen to share that day.

For Twitter, it's probably safe to assume that tweets that people have favorite would make for good article, blog posts, tools, ideas - because your audience has told you they like the idea with their engagement.

(Side note: This advice must've been woven into an article about baseball because he sure didn't encounter it thumbing through my best of business library.)

But because I want to increase my overall organic traffic, I focus on creating timeless content, such as How - To articles, that will do well in search in the long run.

The problem is that just because their articles are good, it doesn't mean I'm going to give them my email address and add even more «stuff» to my inbox.

If you immediately see yourself as an enterprising investor — solely because Graham says an enterprising investor can expect a higher return than a defensive investor — that's good but consider this: by using the strategy that I will describe later in this article, a defensive investor can expect to earn a return equal to the overall market's return (which has averaged 9.77 % per year since 1900).

And is it better to read a long article (and conversation afterward) that takes roughly an hour, or be forced to pay hundreds upon thousands of dollars because you were too lazy to bother to check or credit your sources?

But if this article was meant to convey an opinion (i.e. «We shouldn't export oil because higher pump prices are an unstoppable evil») then you might as well argue that we shouldn't export ANY goods because that causes the price of those good to go up at home.

I'm particularly fond of list style articles because they're so much easy to digest and they look well - organized.

The answers to these questions are so important because (as we'll see in next week's article) they might direct your attention to potential competitors as well as potential ideas for topics and messaging.

I get the best results though content marketing, because my readers love my articles.

An article about how traditional active stock management is dying because computers are better and cheaper, cites a simple quantitative value strategy compiled by Kenneth French, the Roth Family Distinguished Professor of Finance.

A final demand target, Niskanen explained in a 1992 Cato Journal article, is better than a price level or inflation target «because of the different response to changes in supply conditions.»

These articles were hand - picked by our editor because they provide a good overview of the buying process in 2018:

Hayek does not embrace free banking as an ideal, first - best system, because he thought it prone to over-issue (as I discussed in my 1999 article based on Hayek's other writings).

Well, I advice you read on because this article will answer all your questions.

a bit of a stretch because we can actually watch a woman giving birth to a baby in real time which we cant for the stork & unfortunately evolution cant be demonstrated that way child birth can be & the onion article on gravity gets it better.

Sure, complain about a somewhat balanced article that's well put together on a site known for dumb opinion pieces masquerading as news articles just because there's more important things that could be talked about.

the writer of this article is an idiot and he is not educated and does not have a brain because he has written it with out having any info about it.thats why little knowledge is dangerous.if he does nt know some thing then he is better off not writing things he does not know about

(The Allen article suggested, among other things, that Abraham was persuaded into thinking God wanted his son sacrificed because the Lord's orders came in a «resonant, well - modulated voice.»)

The article I wrote critiquing Lee Grady is called «Women Leaders We Apparently Need to Avoid» because I asked myself these three questions to make sure it followed good critique etiquette.

So in reference to the orginal article and my first point, I would only echo Pascal's Wager: if I live life accepting of God and «love my neighbor,» but it turns out to be wrong because there is no God, I have no regrets; if I live life unaccepting of God and He does exist, well I guess Ghandi and I will be sharing a room...

and also if i have and your answer is yes then if there is a way to get the holy spirit back then please tell me and also please pray for me for a few days and i also want to know that really is the unforgivable sin unforgivable and really i swear on my mother that i don't want to go to hell forever and i am very scared of it please help me urgent and also i am sending a friend request to you on facebook and please accept it so that we can talk on this matter together and also i think you will like my page and i couldn't sleep properly because of this and in my half sleep in my dreams i was just visiting your website and finding my comment missing and i as pleasing god and the holy spirit but as i was receiving my spirit again and again as i mentioned this in my previous comment i was abusing in my mind i couldn't stop abusing and i have a very good mother she tried to wake me but i told her not to do and it was happening same things again and again and i told my mother again the half truth because i don't want to break her heart and she told me that there is nothing like ghosts and they are making me fools (you all) and i am telling you honestly before this i irritate my mother a lot i just watch tv and surf the internet or play games in my pc and i eat and brush late and also don't listen to my parents but after i saw your website i became obedient for a few days and again the same i am disobedient your webpage or article ruined my life but this is not your fault and now days i am buy searching about this topic and my father (Vivek Saraf) broke his hands on the 6th May while riding at a very high speed he normally don't go at a very high speed but he had a very important work so whole he was riding a dog was running on the way and to save his life he gave a very hard brake and he with his nebiour fall down and got injuries in his legs and broke his hands and at first he walked with difficulty and then the local people helped him on his way and took him to the local hospital but the doctor told that we need to go to Kollkata (the capital of west bengal, India) and so he went with his loyal staff because he is a business man and in the hospital he got cured but he still have the fracture in his hands so i request you to pray for him and his negibour also and i will tell you the rest in facebook bye and sorry for spelling mistakes in my previous comments.

Sure, I peruse the articles and interviews, but full transparency: I don't buy the magazine for what's inside — I buy it because I like the people on the cover, and that's exactly why I tuned into NBC's spring hopeful Good Girls.

Do I write jokes in these articles (they're often quite hard to spot) because I genuinely think they're the best way to convey a particular point, or because I want people to think I'm funny?

I don't want to rewrite this article in english, but basically, I came to the following conclusions 1 - that Scriptures ought to be used in close interaction with daily reality (not out the blue, in abstraction, or in academic ivory tower) 2 - it ought to be interpreted by what we could call «crucified» christians 3 - and that «crucified» christian should interpret in the context of a «crucified» community / church (because being in a close knit church is a very good way to actually be «crucified» and sanctified, and because I need insight from others in my interpretations.

It is because of this impending failure of the religion of law that Moses predicted a better covenant would come which would be based on relationship rather than religious laws and regulations (cf. this article on Deut 30:11 - 14).

This article is arguably hypocritical as well as stomach - churning, since it begins with the suggestion that «Because of the amazingly diverse multicultural contexts in which pastoral ministers are called upon to work today, it is impossible to prescribe one liturgical model that will be always and everywhere appropriate»: this flexible and open - minded liturgist then proceeded to argue in The Tablet that only the Mass of Paul VI is always and everywhere appropriate and that its very existence automatically abrogated all previous liturgies for ever: presumably those who prefer the older form are not to be given the dignity of a group or «culture» to be catered for by his free and easy multicultural ways, but are to be simply dismissed as a bunch of liturgical perverts.

Clearly the athletes in the article are choosing not to fast, thats their choice, the Mufti is simply stating that being an athlete is not a good reason not to fast, simply because you want to win.

The article you mentioned seems to be claiming that these examples discredit the dating of the geologic layers, which is incorrect, because multiple radiometric datings, as well as other methods provide consistent confirmatory dates.

I have chosen to use Emmet's formulation of these concepts primarily because her clarifications, and, I might add, simplifications, better lend themselves to the purpose of this article.

I read this article by charisma magazine which i thought was well written which is pro Women preaching http://www.charismamag.com/blogs/fire-in-my-bones/16851-why-i-defend-women-preachers This debate is an on going one John Piper who i respect as a bible preacher believes that scripture is clear women shouldnt have authority over men or teach in the church some go as far as saying women shouldnt preach in sunday school if the classes are mixed.Personally i think times are changing and i say that because i have a women manager she has authority over me and other men so if we follow the biblical example i shouldnt allow myself to be in that situation which is just crazy thinking.

Newspapers come out with these feel good articles about religion on a regular basis because it helps sell their advertizing.

In «Make Hell Hot Again» (August / September), Marc Barnes claims that I argue the following in a recent article for the American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly: «A world populated in the end by saints and sinners is a better cosmic whole than a world that contains only saints, because in the former world, where God brings at least some human beings to glory, and eternally as well as justly punishes the rest, God is able to manifest his goodness the most clearly and fully.»

I agree with you Tim, the premise of the article leads one to believe that because LDS has a big accredited university with deep theological minds and some leader of a big Christian seminary, again a deep theological mind, head knowledge not heart knowledge, that Mormonism should be recognized as a stream of Christianity.How Mormons differ is how they relate to Christ and the Holy Spirit.Only people who have encountered Jesus and thus a changed life, can be called an evangelical.Mormnism is man made religion.The Holy Spirit always points people to Jesus, not another man - Joseph Smith.Great moral people, who do lots of good and build beautiful tabernacles, but then again the Pharisees did too.

«This article does a good job of pointing out the changing face of religious belief in this country, and shouldn't be attacked because the author happens to hold a particular belief system.

This article is totally bogus because some of the best sex around can be gotten from repressed Christians.

Also, I assume you can't read very well, because you're a christian, but the author is a biblical scholar and a pastor, unlike you, and she said nowhere in the article that she is a gay or a lesbian.

And so now, sadly, the unnamed authors of the accusatory books and articles make themselves look foolish because, for everybody who knows better, the view they are trying to refute doesn't exist!

Because it takes the place of shortening in keeping the chocolate more free - flowing and making it more smooth, which is exactly what we're looking for in this dip (here's a great little article about that, as well as other chocolate - related topics).

I really like this article from Serious Eats on several methods of grilling corn, I think I agree that grilling the naked ear tastes better because of the charring.

I have got many information from this unique article.Keep sharing article like this because it might help many like me in getting the best Doctors on home visit chennai

This article reminds me of a Good Eats episode that was a couple of nights ago about peas and the reason they have a bad reputation (because people have bad memories of being forced to eat them by parents that didn't know how to make them).

I ve shown this recipe to my wife and she told me is a good one, but you have to modified the article because the proportions are not right for 20 cannelés.