Not exact matches
As in my tweet above, that very
well could be
asset allocators with low stock allocations that conclude that they need to chase the rally.
Well, according to the
Asset Allocator, I have a 96 % chance of reaching my goal in 25 years and a 50 % chance of getting close to $ 2 million at the end of the same time period.
To get a
better understanding of our portfolio, I recently started to play with a premium tool from Morningstar called
Asset Allocator.
«The Intelligent
Asset Allocator» by W. Berstein is a
good read if you're so inclined.
The CEO, Wasilenkoff, appears to be a great wheeler - dealer, buying
assets for cents on the dollar, and hopefully a great capital
allocator as
well.
One explanation is that while the Euro crisis of 2012 discouraged transatlantic investment, with
better economic news it is natural to expect some returning investment from U.S.
asset allocators.
William Bernstein (the excellent author of The Intelligent
Asset Allocator, The Four Pillars of Investing, etc.) had a
good post on the Permanent Portfolio.
The main reason we did that (even though they're all useless in predicting future performance) is because publishing the Fee - Based Moderate Model's alpha number on the model demo, and the
asset allocator demo properly proves how
well it usually outperforms.
It works
well if your goal is to have a set mix of
asset classes (like 70 % bonds / 25 % stock / 5 % cash portfolio), without having an
asset allocator program tell you what your mix should be.
Step 2) Although we think you're going to get the
best investment returns with the
asset class weights that came with the
allocator models, you can easily modify them.
«The alternative
asset management industry is
well - positioned in the middle of these forces, providing institutional
allocators and family offices with access to investment strategies that offer both diversification from traditional risk
assets and the promise of a differentiated return profile.»