Sentences with phrase «good business sense because»

I would add that the self - publishing process makes better business sense because there are no bookstore returns.

Not exact matches

Replacing human cooks earning $ 10 per hour with expensive robots may be possible technically, but might not make business sense because it may cost too much and not provide a good return on investment.

The sharks are well versed in the art of evaluating a business so make sure the proposal that makes it to the negotiation table is one that the opposite party will take seriously because if you mess it up and the proposal makes no sense, you'll be leaving without getting anything.

They aren't doing this for the good of the country (although that may be a nice byproduct); they're doing it because it makes good business sense.

This option is brilliant because it blends aspects of human psychology with good business sense.

Because so many small businesses tend to be seasonal, it makes sense to clamp down on expenses and manage finances when times are lean, but it's just as important to be mindful of expenses and prepare for those lean times when business is booming and cash flow is good for a seasonal small business.

You have a sense of worth because you are proud of your business and feel good about your direction.

Alex goes on to argue that treating customer data with respect makes business sense because as you retain your access to that data, you also preserve the ability to make better decisions.

They will probably end up going under and destroying their business just because they wanted to punish employees through their religious beliefs — Management needs a good swift smack to the back of the head — hopefully that will knock some sense into things.

talk about skewing the stats to fit your own conclusions... this is like a slap in the face to every real Arsenal fan... have you no shame, have you no dignity, have you no sense of right from wrong... if you think everything was so well orchestrated why is everyone and their brother laughing at the way in which we conduct business both on and off the field... either you're a paid hack or a delusional buffoon... regardless you can't be a genuine Arsenal fan because the difficulties facing this club having been going on for years and this latest episode in our pathetic recent history is but a glaring reminder of how far we have fallen... I'm not going to waste my time discrediting every single ridiculous statement you made in your love letter to Wenger, but if you write another article I will gladly expose you for the fraud you truly are... this club is in desperate need of a serious cleansing and for you to try and package this dog and pony show as a well - oiled machine is a direct insult to anyone who has supported this team during the supposed «lean» years... the deceptive and disrespectful manner in which this organization has treated it's fans is an abomination to supporters everywhere and for you to even try to justify their actions is akin to saying just shut - up and keep filling our pockets... so please crawl back under whatever stone you crawled out from under and think carefully before you spew this type of propaganda ever again

It only makes business sense because Vanes probably costs less than others boxers, and fighting someone that you have a 95 % or greater chance of beating is better business than fighting someone you don't.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

CIHT believes that it makes business sense because it helps organisations attract and retain the best talent, enables them to understand and meet clients» needs more effectively and so provide a better quality service.

«This is too logical a transition for anyone to have an ideological argument against clean energy, because it stands against economic growth and good business sense,» says Daniel Kammen, professor of energy at the University of California, Berkeley, and science envoy for the U.S. State Department, who is attending the talks, «That's what people are saying here — they're incredulous that anyone would want to back off on this.»

Because agents held the power (and the purse strings, as well, which was another business tradition that made no sense from the author's perspective — it boiled down to: «authors aren't good with money, so it is better to let the business - headed agent deal with it all.»

In a radio interview on Authors on the Air a few months ago, bestselling author Martin Crosbie openly admitted on live radio that he responded to negative reviews because he read my blog and it made good business sense to him.

(If you are pricing your novel under $ 2.99, I have a hunch this post won't help you because you don't have enough common business sense to even get the best discount for your work.)

I'll be watching what you're doing, though, because you seem to have very good business sense when it comes to self - publishing!

One other friend of mine left he was in the real estate space wrote a book with with a major publishing house and then a few years later stopped he left real estate and went into a really strong personal development business and the publisher went up well you're not promoting this book anymore and they took his book word - for - word and put somebody else's name on the cover of it and just put a new introduction on it no credit to anybody he had worked because he had two co-authors help him with it because he's dyslexic so they essentially were the ones that wrote it and he provided a lot of the content and the publisher gave those other authors no credit took his name off and put somebody else's name on the front and then the publisher was 100 % within their rights to do it so you know there's a lot of things that I challenge people to kind of think about what's important and if you're putting all your expertise into this book you want to make sure that somebody's negotiated a heck out of it giving you a contract that actually makes sense for you and your business.

However, given the size of their business, they don't strike me as lacking business sense, and I'd bet good money that availability to those outside the US is something they're looking into, but because of the unique qualities of the Kindle (the Whispernet and their agreement with a cell phone provider) it wouldn't be quick work to do this worldwide.

Of course, speculating that the TV show will return to the Attitude era is almost pointless, because the current PG era that the show is in makes good business sense for the WWE as it lets them sell a lot of merchandise and attract a larger audience.

AAA ports or games that release on other platforms give their customers plenty of options (because that's good business), but it doesn't create a sense of urgency for anyone to buy VR.

Utilities and Fortune 500 brands both continue to scale up investments in wind energy because it makes good business sense.

«We are increasingly seeing large multinationals such as Google, IKEA and Dalmia Cement demonstrating real leadership on renewables because it makes business sense — as well as helping to lower emissions, providing stable energy costs and increasing competitiveness.

Increasingly, he says, businesses accept that they need a «social licence» to operate «because it just makes good business sense, frankly.»

And David I respectfully disagree and would like to point out that just because certain things aren't being done doesn't necessarily mean it's because these measures don't make good business sense.

I did not write «because these measures don't make good business sense».

When I was looking for car insurance, I knew I wanted to stay local because I enjoy supporting local businesses and they often have a better sense of customer service.

Again, the cost was palatable because more team members meant greater productivity and more moving parts to manage, so it made good business sense.

Because property managers bear the burden when disasters happen, it's good sense and good business practice to have well - planned procedures in place to mitigate potential problems.

Associations should care about inclusion because it makes good business sense, says Fred Underwood, NAR's director of diversity and community outreach programs.

The bottom line is that leasing solar panels is not a good economic decision for homeowners or a good business practice for building owners (commercial properties may make more economic sense), because leasing greatly diminishes the economic returns for building owners and makes money for the equipment owner, not the building owner.

It may make good safety sense, but probably not good business sense, because there's a likelihood that John X will simply say, «Never mind.»