Not exact matches
The first few months with a new hire can feel
like a prolonged first date as you warily check for signs of
good chemistry.
I can't say if that's a
good or bad thing because I can't remember the exact nature of the dreams, but it's there nevertheless, much
like my recurring dreams of dropping out of grade 12
chemistry class or lightsaber battles with Qui - Gon Jinn.
Well, given that many atheists are actually more informed (as studies have confirmed) than believers, a
better analogy would be that it's
like asking a former professional chemist now teaching an English class about
chemistry instead of asking the
Chemistry teacher who never made it past chem 101 as an undergrad.
I am a
well trained Physicist and I know about the history of the earth with evidences from [Geo]
chemistry, physics, biology and the
like and yet know that they all have holes and are «not proofs» of anything
They had some pretty
good chemistry out there, and she'd benefit being paired up with a veteran
like Goldy.
I said experiment because I am not sure how their
chemistry would work out on the pitch as we do not see them everyday in training... for example I am not sure if Neny can play the defensive role as effectively as Coq, but since Coq is not performing at the level we usually expect of him anyway, I would pun for Neny there for now... Based on what I have seen so far, I would say Neny defensive game would be based on covering and interceptions rather than going in strongly for tackles
like Coq but the plus is he runs and covers more ground than Flamini, and his movement and ball distribution is definitely
better than both Flamini and Coq.
But those
good - old, intangible qualities
like «culture» and «
chemistry» still matter.
And I felt
like the
chemistry out there was pretty
good for the most part.»
(1) this squad has way too many moving parts and very few of our players are
good enough at their preferred position let alone relying on them in whatever position Wenger and his magic eight ball decide in the tunnel prior to the game... when teams do this it generally signals issues within the club, much
like Jose last year and Van Gael before him... no one gets settled, the
chemistry is almost non-existent and if provides a built - in excuse when the team comes up short... these issues fall squarely on Wenger, both for his decisions regarding players coming in and for his inability to rid the team of those players who aren't cutting it... in actually fact we have only 6 real starters on this current squad and that's being generous (Sanchez, Ozil, Lacazette, Sead, Kos & Cazorla)... which is discouraging because Cazorla is injured and might never play again, Sanchez is wanting out and the club is lying to us about his injury status, Lacazette receives no service, Ozil is relatively disinterested out there, Kos is getting up there and Sead is just trying to settle in... there isn't a single other player that would start regularly on any of the other top 3 teams, which should be the standard... imagine this team moving forward if Wenger only sells before the window closes
This Glenbrook squad has perhaps the
best chemistry in this league and can easily bounce back, especially when players Jake Santellano and Adam Slutsky showed up with big performances
like they did on Sunday.
And regarding our strikers they r regularly scoring so y do we distrupt the
chemistry of the team n call for wengers head after it does nt click, so we as fans should nt go overboard of managing the manager, let him handle the situation, and if he says theo is a striker let it be that way coz he is the one who sees the players day in n day out, and enjoy the
best football game in the whole world, when arsenal play it the arsenal way, even barca seems
like cambridge united in front of our beautiful game
As Spalletti alluded to, competition for the starting spot should bring out the
best in both keepers, and while neither seems
like the type to throw a tantrum, you always want to keep clubhouse
chemistry in mind when making these sort of personnel decisions.
Boehner called Ryan a «great choice» for Romney because he put the GOP on the «offensive» on tough issues
like Medicare, and said the two of them have «a very serious relationship» with
good chemistry.
When reviewing issues
like company culture and personal
chemistry, go with what you see as
well as hear.
I often talk to graduate students who are interested in learning more about my job as a professor of
chemistry at a top - tier liberal arts college and about the
best way to prepare for a job
like mine.
These spheres called micelles are molecules that roll up
like roly - poly bugs based on the
chemistry along their bodies — pointing outwards are the parts of their molecules that play
well chemically with both the surrounding water and the calcite, while tucked inside are the parts that don't get along with the watery environment.
Imagine if you could trigger a powerful release of oxytocin in your body, along with other feel -
good hormones
like serotonin, without taking anything or inadvertently messing with your body
chemistry or tolerance levels?
My current partner and I don't match up as
well in our
likes and dislikes, but we have incredible
chemistry, and our relationship is stronger because of it.»
Sites
like speeddater,
chemistry, HurryDate and 8minuteDating also allow participants to create online profiles, which helps you keep track of people you meet at the different events, but above you'll do
well to remember at whatever event you're at to take notes on your dates (e.g. Johnny, blue shirt, pilot).
You will discover that
chemistry, or that intuitive feeling of relational and romantic perfection, exists because of the connection of opposite self - orientations, not because of a
well thought out list of similarities,
likes, and dislikes.
They have the ability to meet each other and get a feel for each other's personality and get to know each other a little
better before they take it offline.With «webdating,» you get a feel for
chemistry and the ability to pinpoint each other's personality and character; you can see them, see how they smile, see how they move and this gives you insight into what that person is really
like as opposed to just reading a typed profile or chat with them on IM which is less personal.
If you are a promising candidate and devote a lot of time to it (
like you are committed to spending your week - ends online for the next year or two) you may eventually get lucky to find a decent guy, who really wsnts a relationship and looks
like a
good fit but... when you meet face to face it is not guarnteed you would have a great
chemistry.
Imagine what it would be
like to only be introduced to people that shared similar interests and goals, that shared the same core vales, they are looking for the same type of relationship you are looking for and
best of all, you have amazing
chemistry.
Would
like to meet someone who has
good work ethics and funny and hopefully there will be
chemistry.
Though not required keep in mind the more steps you do complete
like personal
chemistry test the
better the chance your online dating match will fit your own lifestyle.
She knew the only thing that would work was a true matchmaker — someone who spent the time to screen potential clients and their matches, someone who would look for things
like timing, compatible lifestyles, life goals, and activity levels as
well as physical
chemistry.
Some people give up on a
good date because they feel
like there was no «
chemistry» on the first date.
You and your new crush have gone on a few great dates, and everything's going
well —
chemistry, laughing, flirting — and it looks
like things might move forward.
Who knows what could happen if the online
chemistry, phone
chemistry, and that magical connection all clicked
like a
well oiled machine.
well i am positive.romantique, honnest and open mind, yes i still believe in
chemistry is very important in
good relation.i
like to be in nature,
like go fishing, camping.i
like to cook too, stay home have a great converstion, cuddel, just relax.
It's
good to know what you do and don't
like, but usually, what works on paper isn't nearly as important as how
chemistry occurs in real life — so be open - minded enough to allow the unexpected into your life.
Though Stiller and Wilson aren't showing us anything new here, there's no denying their
chemistry together; the actors play
well off each other, which is certainly the most important element in a buddy comedy
like this.
Honestly, their
chemistry was
good and it was nice that the plot ending was not forced,
like it all came down to victory for them all.
What's left are the romantic spurts between Reuben and Polly, but even then, they don't really seem
like a
good fit for each other, perhaps because Stiller and Aniston themselves don't have any
chemistry between them.
The film didn't do this, as it failed to get to the real person and spent all its time on surface material and marriage spats that looked
like artificial acting devices even though the actors had a
good screen
chemistry together.
They really are sisters and there was no pressure working for their dad, allowing them to really make it seem
like this is a real family, and it's a
good thing too, because for as
good as both Paul Rudd and Leslie Mann are, they just didn't have much
chemistry together.
Like the theme of the movie, it's a lot like many other love stories you're seen before, but with good chemistry and some surprisingly smart and profound moments, A Lot Like Love manages to overcome conventions with infectious charm and underlying sweetn
Like the theme of the movie, it's a lot
like many other love stories you're seen before, but with good chemistry and some surprisingly smart and profound moments, A Lot Like Love manages to overcome conventions with infectious charm and underlying sweetn
like many other love stories you're seen before, but with
good chemistry and some surprisingly smart and profound moments, A Lot
Like Love manages to overcome conventions with infectious charm and underlying sweetn
Like Love manages to overcome conventions with infectious charm and underlying sweetness.
There's no natural
chemistry; somehow Eastwood's camera makes these three real - life
best friends seem
like complete strangers reading from cue cards.
I do understand why this movie bombed at the box office because it's seems to remind people about Independence Day but it was still a
good film and I
liked the
chemistry between Channing Tatum & Jamie Foxx the were so funny.
Nony and his female counterparts (Romi Aboulafia and Yaara Pelzig) have potent on - screen
chemistry and play off each other
well, demonstrating the evolution of their relationships
like pros.
The cast has
good chemistry, and I would
like to see them together again in a
better movie.
Here, the guileless Hirsch — who, at 18, still professes awe over boobies and cigars and Long Island iced teas — takes the odd
good - natured dig at Cuthbert («Elisha had her own
chemistry going on»), while Cuthbert says things that probably should've remained as interior monologues,
like her statement that she was channelling Angelina Jolie for part of her performance.
The
chemistry between Tatum and Hill puts it over, however, and makes the inevitable sequel teased in the final scene feel
like a
good idea.
What this movie has is oodles of cast
chemistry, and it's very clear that the entire cast and crew enjoyed making it, with almost everyone looking
like they are on the verge of laughter throughout the film (the end of film bloopers bears proof of this
well).
The film relies on the
chemistry of Jake Gyllenhaal and Michael Pena, and thankfully the two feel
like best friends.
Damon and Greengrass have clearly proven that they've got
chemistry, what with their work together on «The Bourne Supremacy» and «The Bourne Ultimatum,» and we're obviously looking forward to checking it out, but...
well, here's the thing: Damon's a great action hero, but he can be pretty hilarious, too, and «Green Zone» doesn't exactly look
like what you'd call a laff riot.
Main characters Nina and Max come off
like faded photocopies of Nico and George from Broken Sword, trying hard to emulate their series - driving
chemistry but falling
well short of the goal.
The cast has
good chemistry and I
like the dry humor they use with Ford's character.
But
like any pair of real human characters who have
good chemistry, the two give and take and learn from each other, while growing into real partners.
While Jonah Hill is without a doubt the star, having had tons of experience in films
like Superbad and Knocked Up, Tatum does a fine job as
well and the two actors have great
chemistry together.