Sentences with phrase «good clue about»

Often, the best clues about a management team's integrity are found in the company's accounting practices.

Third, the resurrection offers the best clue about the relationship between our work for peace and justice now and the perfect shalom of the coming kingdom.

Comments, behaviors, and observations by your child can provide good clues about the things your teacher likes and can be helpful in figuring out the best teacher gift to give.

Take a look to get good clues about your health.

These may be meaningless for an accurate «global» temperature determination, but they give some pretty good clues about the internal oscillations.

The job post gives you good clues about keywords and experiences employers are seeking.

Not exact matches

If you don't have a clue about who's in the game or the pool and what they're doing, the patsy at the party is most likely you (or it will be soon enough) and that's an unhappy and ultimately untenable situation that never ends well for the ones who end up with the short end of the stick.

If you need clues about where to begin, pay attention to where the happiest employees are in your business, since this can indicate that something is working very well — something that can be replicated elsewhere.

When the BYOD craze started, company officials had no clue about network security, much less the best practices that would be necessary to reduce the risks introduced by employees using their personal computers, smartphones and tablets for company business.

[01:10] Introduction [02:45] James welcomes Tony to the podcast [03:35] Tony's leap year birthday [04:15] Unshakeable delivers the specific facts you need to know [04:45] What James learned from Unshakeable [05:25] Most people panic when the stock market drops [05:45] Getting rid of your fear of investing [06:15] Last January was the worst opening, but it was a correction [06:45] You are losing money when you sell on corrections [06:55] Bear markets come every 5 years on average [07:10] The greatest opportunity for a millennial [07:40] Waiting for corrections to invest [08:05] Warren Buffet's advice for investors [08:55] If you miss the top 10 trading days a year... [09:25] Three different investor scenarios over a 20 year period [10:40] The best trading days come after the worst [11:45] Investing in the current world [12:05] What Clinton and Bush think of the current situation [12:45] The office is far bigger than the occupant [13:35] Information helps reduce fear [14:25] James's story of the billionaire upset over another's wealth [14:45] What money really is [15:05] The story of Adolphe Merkle [16:05] The story of Chuck Feeney [16:55] The importance of the right mindset [17:15] What fuels Tony [19:15] Find something you care about more than yourself [20:25] Make your mission to surround yourself with the right people [21:25] Suffering made Tony hungry for more [23:25] By feeding his mind, Tony found strength [24:15] Great ideas don't interrupt you, you have to pursue them [25:05] Never - ending hunger is what matters [25:25] Richard Branson is the epitome of hunger and drive [25:40] Hunger is the common denominator [26:30] What you can do starting right now [26:55] Success leaves clues [28:10] What it means to take massive action [28:30] Taking action commits you to following through [29:40] If you do nothing you'll learn nothing [30:20] There must be an emotional purpose behind what you're doing [30:40] How does Tony ignite creativity in his own life [32:00] «How is not as important as «why» [32:40] What and why unleash the psyche [33:25] Breaking the habit of focusing on «how» [35:50] Deep Practice [35:10] Your desired outcome will determine your action [36:00] The difference between «what» and «why» [37:00] Learning how to chunk and group [37:40] Don't mistake movement for achievement [38:30] Tony doesn't negotiate with his mind [39:30] Change your thoughts and change your biochemistry [40:00] The bad habit of being stressed [40:40] Beautiful and suffering states [41:50] The most important decision is to live in a beautiful state no matter what [42:40] Consciously decide to take yourself out of suffering [43:40] Focus on appreciation, joy and love [44:30] Step out of suffering and find the solution [45:00] Dealing with mercury poisoning [45:40] Tony's process for stepping out of suffering [46:10] Stop identifying with thoughts — they aren't yours [47:40] Trade your expectations for appreciation [50:00] The key to life — gratitude [51:40] What is freedom for you?

In March, Simmons provided a potential clue about his future, tweeting out an article about good friend Adam Corolla's independent podcasting company.

Nasser offered few clues about how Aramco will attract investors, only saying the company will be «competing» with the best in Big Oil.

I agree with the big bang guy... if we talk about proof... let's first figure where we all came from... we have all heard this «Well we know what happened after the big bang... but have no clue what came before» well first figure that out... and if you can't in the next 20 years then there has to be something beyond PhysicWell we know what happened after the big bang... but have no clue what came before» well first figure that out... and if you can't in the next 20 years then there has to be something beyond Physicwell first figure that out... and if you can't in the next 20 years then there has to be something beyond Physics...

I don't know if the other disciples understood what Jesus was talking about, but I had no clue, and so I said to Jesus, «Well, in that case, wash all of me!

Well, if we translate the Greek word baptizma in Matthew 28:19 - 20, we get a clue as to what Jesus might have actually been teaching... and this leads to the one crazy suggestion about Matthew 28:19 - 20 that might help solve this particular baptism debate.

What Mac does well is sell to people who don't have a clue about PC's.

Well, he didn't say anything about homosexuality in the gospels, that should give a clue.

That distinction is a half - truth at best, and it misses two important points: the widespread reading of such books not only tells us something important about the overall religious temper of our times; it may also give us a clue to one possible theological expression of the future.

Genesis gives us some clues about this, saying that there were two special trees in Eden: a tree of life; and a tree of the knowledge of good and evil.

Tell me not to lie, get a clue, or better yet, how about you get an IQ test so I will know that it is under 100 and you can't understand more than a paragraph at a time.

Hearing stupid atheists respond to my posts is the best evidence that i'm right... you get all these angry morons that don't have a clue what they're talking about trying to attack my argument, «BUT THOSE PEOPLE WHO MURDERED MILLIONS THEY WERE N'T DRIVEN BY ATHEISM TO KILL»....

There's a ton of stuff that we have no clue about in this universe that can not be explained empirically — especially why bad things happen to good people.

All these comments go to show that we are very far away from what is suppose to SEPERATION OF CHURCH AND STATE... all you religious zealots get a clue... if your god is so powerful why doesn't he put your man in office... I'll tell you... he could care less about the piddly human contest to rule the world... really, please, use some logic in determination of who is best for this country...

Well, he's got me proclaiming, for those who have eyes to see and ears to hear, that something is deeply amiss within; that we think we're special and you are not; that you need us more than we need you; that we don't trust you or your brain; that you are obviously going to hell without us; that we are completely out of touch with the real world; that we don't have a sweet clue about you, your kind, or your needs and desires; and that we're oblivious to innuendo and blind to double entendre.

Suffice it to say that the conceptuality which I accept — and accept because it seems to do justice to deep analysis of human experience and observation, as well as to the knowledge we now have of the way «things go» in the world — lays stress on the dynamic «event» character of that world; on the inter-relationships which exist in what is a societal universe, on the inadequacy of «substance» thinking to describe such a universe of «becoming» and «belonging», on the place of decisions in freedom by the creatures with the consequences which such decisions bring about, and on the central importance of persuasion rather than coercive force as a clue to the «going» of things in that universe.

I don't think Jesus would support this administration... And since you want to know about Jesus... The Bible says if you don't work you don't eat... So I'm SICK of working my butt off and seeing all these people sit around cooking out and not working and wearing real nice clothes, nothing but the best... That is nuts... Nancy Pelosi get out on the streets go from neighborhood to neighborhood... Try Memphis, or New Orleans... You don't have a clue of what goes on... Your Blind...

When you're hunting your gone all day, walking for miles and interesting animals come home that you have no clue what to do with.The only good thing about this hunting trip was I did not go and the granola bars I made.

But they didn't because despite what people say about how good Gazidis is as CEO he does not have a clue how a football club is run.

Sometimes these players have no clue about what is and what isn't good for the team.

Said he has no clue about future schedule but, if Tiger feels good, would hope he plays Torrey.

I keep saying this and I will say it again that a good portion of our fanbase doesn't have a clue about how football works nor knows how to use common sense to evaluate what is going on?

People think that we have 200 million sloshing in the bank to spend but ppl ai nt got a clue about commercial finance, people have said that Joel Campbell is our second best attacking option based on 4 games, people have suggested with no qualifications or experience that are better than Wenger tactically and complain of being cheapwith a 70 million net spend?????

I agree one of Ramsey / Carzola / Ozil needs to be dropped but don't start personally criticizing one of our better players for unfounded reasons you haven't the slightest clue about, idiot.

A lot of people here thought that Monaco will be an easy ride (well the deluded and the ones who have no clues about football and even watching it).

In your book Wenger should also be «the best informed» yet he is a disaster and has no clue any longer about what it takes to win the PL.

Like you said, he was talking about one of the coaches, but good god I hope he isn't involved in choosing our next manager, not that the board have any clue what they're doing either.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Chambers, I don't know about anyone else but I didn't have a clue what type of player we were getting because it was sprung from nowhere and anybody who claims they knew of him and expected great things well I would find that curious.

There are a number of one - trick ponies... for example, Gesicki is a very good receiver but has absolutely NO clue about blocking.

Giroud as good player — anyone who says different or uses terms like «donkey» hasn't a clue about football.

He just has no clue about how good he can be.»

Seriously, you have no fu cking clue about managing a club so better leave that to the big boys.

If Mr wenger built a team who never lost it tells me he can build a team remember a team consists of 11 different characters with different back grounds beliefs and aspirations and problems with another 11 to back them up I remember years ago the press used to talk about arsenal and not having English players on the field never the less I know off our own fatalities as such we were somehow always coming up little short by injuries to such Edwardo vanpercie and even gas diaby ramsy rosiscky carzola and many more and others that did nt seem to gel well I am not blind and I know we are not doing well but to suggest that Mr wenger docent have a clue is totally preposterous and disrespectful

Well, he could hardly be objective and say: We are even worse than last year, and our manager hasn't got a clue about how to stop us getting overrun by teams like Liverpool and leaking goals to all other teams.

The thing is, though, when you line up all of those names and think about who Juve is most likely to sign — and I guess we can throw Can out of the mix right now because we have no clue as to where he wants to go right now — we have another question pop into our head: Are Cristante and Pelegrini the kind of midfielders that can truly make Juventus better?

That there was no real substantive talk linking him elsewhere was one of the first clues that his future with the club would last longer than Alexis's, and now seeing how this transfer window played out appears to have given him hope that the club is serious about returning to its place among the best in the country.

Instead, however, she paid me lip service and acted like she cared about my birth plan (though she didn't act very well and that should have been a big clue for me) and said we could «try» Hypnobirthing, etc..

Good gracious woman, you don't have the slightest clue what you are talking about, I nursed my twins for six weeks and nearly went mad from the stress as I never made enough milk for both of them, no matter what I tried.

«This has been a wonderful tradition and is one of the best ways of continuing to share clues about our past.»

I'm learning and getting better, but most of us don't have a clue about healthy foods or how to prepare them.