Sentences with phrase «good counter attacking football»

I hate to agree with you but LCFC could very well be an ideal team for Theo, good counter attacking football and if Theo finds his form in a system like that...

Not exact matches

the point im trying to make is that if we have a DM it will slow the counter attacks down, giving BFG a few extra seconds to read the play, therefore getting the best out of him...... im not a football manager or a coach, but its not only me who can see this flaw in our game, its the whole world.....

If they are going to play an attacking football against Arsenal, that is good and what we want it to get an open space for our counter attacking play.

We continue to try to pass through opponents playing for an idea of great Barcelona-esque football, when we don't have the players for it and our best successes come when we play counter attacking football.

I believe tgere are 3 titke contenders this year Leicester, city and arsenal About Leicester they are doing great but there football depends on counter attacking and few quick passes to reach the ball to mahrez or vardy i don't think they can impress anybody if they faced teams that park the bus like what the teams do with arsenal and also any injury for mahrez or vardy will ruin there season so i don't consider them a real challenge and in an open game we got the best out of them and beat them with 5 goals to 2 so calm down gooners About city they had very impressing start for the season then they were vety baf winning most games by pure luck or last minute goals and they could be beaten easily Arsenal are the best team form we controled most of the games and the losses and draws were by bad referee decisions or bad luck and the 4 points margain with city could have been easily 10 or 12

While armchair managing is all fun and good... Why on earth would you want us to play a new system for a game this big!?!? I get fans fondness for the 4 -4-2 while seeing the very entertaining football teams like Leicester and Atletico play with scything counter attacks... But this is Arsenal playing Chelsea at home after they've had a couple of disappointing results.

Secondly, as I just outlined, counter attacking football is rarely good if the opponents are not committing players.

We look a better counter attacking team yet Wenger stil makes us play this slow lethargic side to side passing football

We have arguably gotten better results at the Etihad playing counter attacking football and seeing as how Chelsea devastated them with this approach, we shouldn't shy away from it.

Facts remains with Santi, Ozil, Sanchez and potentially Mayrez, Lacazette, a well built striker for counter attacking football will excel.

Some may point to the fact that Chelsea only had 3 but if you assess the situation, Chelsea were never going to come out guns blazing at Arsenal, Chelsea thrive on controlling the game and counter attacks, having a free flowing game of attacking football is in Arsenal's best interest not Chelsea's and as such they would do everything to break up the play, seek for one off opportunities to get a goal and or get goals from set pieces and it worked like a charm against us.

Not only that, the prof also praised his rival manager Claudio Ranieri and revealed that the Gunners would be trying to employ the same sort of possession based football that has been our trademark under Wenger4 for years, even though he was well aware of the threat that the Foxes possess with their pace and ability to hit teams with their counter attacking style.

These teams have good defences and often play counter attack football against us.

If we gonna play possession football then he is a better option as he is able to protect n keep the ball well as opposed to the Ox who is better suited to counter attacking football.

I don't care that we do not have 70 % possession anymore, we are still playing good football, in fact I find out more counter attacking game more enjoyable to watch and most importantly we are getting the 3 points!

We look good on the counter attack yet Wenger stil makes us play this slow possession football

Most top teams play a form of counter attacking football — but most of them play better possession football when they have the ball.

Football is a team sport, if we defend very well away from home, we are a good counter attacking team, we will always scoren enough with all these striker talk pls..

We all know that Claudio Ranieri and the Foxes thrive on playing a counter attacking style of football and I worry that we could well play into their hands on Saturday.

What I don't understand is the tactics, counter attacking football works well against sides who are comfortable on the ball and struggle to either gain width, that aren't direct enough in their attack or have no aerial threat.

Counter attacking teams don't play the best football.

we're going to have to absorb a fair amount of pressure and imo giroud offers an outlet as he keeps possession better in the middle and attacking third of the pitch, unless we're looking to play counter attacking football I think he'll start

YES set up a team not to loss» had to beat» that can press the opposition well as a team and as individuals like sanchze does it not pretending to press lolh while playing position football with purpose and counter attacking football that has a well balanced squad in terms of age, wclass talent + above average players who improve every season

and play counter attacking football — always works well at emirates...

The Blues, at their irresistible best, opened a three - goal lead by the break after playing some scintillating counter attacking football.