Sentences with phrase «good decisions in your case»

This graph represents pretty good decisions in every case.
If you make these decisions with the advice of a knowledgeable and successful attorney, you will make good decisions in your case.
The thought of having well over a million dollars in debt service (11,200 a month back then because we are in a very high tax area) when I could buy half a dozen properties with cash and not make a lot of money but enough, and still have them to rent out or even sell to generate income seems a lot better decision in my case, but not in all cases.

Not exact matches

While most of us think that making decisions rationally — with piles of statistics and numbers and other evidence to back us up — is the best way to go, in reality, this is often not the case.
In the current challenging economic environment, a company's worst - case scenarios might include the bankruptcy of its biggest and once - best customer, a banker's decision to close down its corporate credit line, the postponement or cancellation of an impending initial public offering, or the meltdown of a company's value.
In any case, testing gives you a much better idea of what is truly happening with shopping - cart decisions, and how to optimize the entire mobile shopping experience to make the register ring this holiday season.
This decision probably shouldn't have been a surprise, because it basically said that the court's 2010 decision in the Citizens United case, upholding the right of corporations to spend money in federal elections, applies to the states as well.
Reckless ambition It's important that investors are level - headed in their decision making, because what looks like a good investment on the surface may not be the case.
Canada managed the financial storm of 2008 better than others because we anticipated risks and acted proactively with public policy foresight, responsible oversight of our financial industry, and better decisions and performance by financial service providers and our clients than was the case in other countries.
For example, as has been the case in all 19 years the survey has been conducted, a very large majority, 91 % of survey respondents, reported that creating employee ownership through an ESOP was «a good business decision that has helped the company.»
Since the survey's beginnings 20 years ago, and the case in all the years the survey has been conducted even in 2009, a very large majority, 92.2 % of survey respondents, reported that creating employee ownership through an ESOP was «a good business decision that has helped the company.»
I've written elsewhere (and will have more to say soon, since I've got a lecture deadline) about the Supreme Court's quite breathtaking (in a good way) decision in the Arizona tuition tax credit case.
It may well be the case that God so respects the «humanity» of each particular individual that he will seldom, if ever, override those decisions which are significant in an individual's own life history, even if the actualization of such decisions will negatively affect large numbers of people.
If, therefore, we discuss future human structures and institutions of the Church which would make possible a more active participation of the laity in the decisions of ecclesiastical authorities, such efforts should not be discredited in advance by saying that they would remain in any case subject to the good pleasure of the hierarchy.
Either an argument is cogent enough in itself to bring about this decision, or else it is not cogent at all, and if this is the case, no number of good additional reasons can ever justify such a decision.
In this case the devotional speaker is admired for his art, his eloquence, while that decision of which each man is capable, and that which it may be well to note, is the highest thing of all, is completely ignored.
But since this is the case with God, we can speak meaningfully of a divine enrichment by accomplished good in creation, and we can also allow for what might be styled a divine sadness because of wrong creaturely decisions and what they bring about.
If we adopt the latter position, as I believe we should, then we must ask whether in the case of temporal occasions as well the ontological principle allows that their own decisions can be explanatory of conceptual prehensions not derived from physical prehensions.
And while it is obviously possible that such decision may be erroneous in any given case, still the evil effect following it, being limited to that particular case, with the chance that it may be overruled and never become a precedent for other cases, can better be borne than could the evils of a different practice.
In short, this is a case of Hobby Lobby not trusting their employees to be able to make good choices for themselves and so decided to deny their employees their personal religious freedom of making health decisions without interference from their employer.
If we adopt the later position, as I believe we should, then we must ask whether in the case of temporal occasions as well the ontological principle allows that their own decisions can be explanatory of conceptual prehensions not derived from physical prehensions.
It is always better to decide in advance in case you want surplus when taking a decision on what quantity to buy.
In many cases, those decisions align with efficiency numbers that suggest the power teams really were better than the ones they beat out.
I suppose it is a case of seeing how he does in pre-season and then making a decision but it is probably best to try and find a good loan spell for him.
It's a tough decision for WENGER to make, but at the end he will need to let Jack go; sadly I am sure he will do well in a different team, unfortunately will never be the case with ARSENAL.
If this were the case then for the first time in a lifetime someone else will be making the decisions and if this is the case they may well choose to sign no one this window, instead doing the negotiations for signings as soon as the season is over and after liaising with Wenger's successor.
«I have a pretty good idea of what I think the starting lineup will be in our first playoff game, but I've got decision to make in case we've got injuries.»
Selling him abroad this season to me will be one of Wenger's best and most brave decisions ever.He'll get my respect tor that.Who says we can't win the league with another player in his position?Have faith for all is not lost.The Van Persie case ws very different since at that time we were not financially strong and couldn't replace having to settle for second rate players except Cazorla at that time.In this case we can actually replace him.I can still see Arsenal getting Lemar because we still have a lot of money for transfers.If we can't get Lemar we should try other options for there's always better.
I take your point but rvp and fab would say that Vardy had a much easier decision, he had already won the PL, they had to move away to win it, ond in fabs case, win a lot more as well.
I think its time to do something about this, over the 2 legs, ireland were clearly the better side, that notwithstanding this particular french team is the worst i've seen in decades, and they have no bussines going to the world cup.It is time for replays to be reviewed in some cases and goaline technology to be applied in other cases, i think we human being have come of age to realise that we humans are not perfect, no matter how hard we try, so for sepp blatter to keep resisting replays and goal line technology is quite baffling to me, i can't really understand why 3 socalled officials could make a decision, a decision in which the whole world saw to be a foul, and its allowed to stand, and a nation is left, heartbroken, cheated and bitter, i am an african, but as a fan of football, i felt terrible seeing this, and i beg the question, if someone other than the team is not benefiting from this, why can't the officials be allowed to take a look at the replays in order to officiate the game better?
It was a hard decision to make, but it was better to make it in high school than to stretch out the drama, up the ante on the tension, or in the worst case scenario: to burn out and to lose my passion for learning at a school where I really didn't belong.
And wishing harm (or negelct, in this case) on another human being does NOT make you any better than someone who makes a hard decision to give up an animal.
In other cases, however, adoptive parents choose to keep their deliberations to themselves and only share their decision when the adoption is well underway.
However, there are other times when a well - thought out decision isn't what we thought it would be, in which case we may need to just dig in our heels and ride the wave of uncertainty or even, inconvenience, until this newfound «whim» or thoughtful decision turns into newfound conviction.
In the best case scenario, a teen has overscheduled himself because he truly loves the activities in which he's involved — but even that situation doesn't mean that it's a healthy decisioIn the best case scenario, a teen has overscheduled himself because he truly loves the activities in which he's involved — but even that situation doesn't mean that it's a healthy decisioin which he's involved — but even that situation doesn't mean that it's a healthy decision.
Don't you think these types of decisions are best made case - by - case, with the child's best interest in mind, looking at different angles, etc?
Parental Rights: Toolkit & Educational Resources Women's Refugee Commission Provides step - by - step instructions and resources to help migrant parents protect and maintain their parental rights and make well - informed, critical decisions regarding the care and welfare of their children in immigration cases.
The study's senior author, Associate Professor Natasha Nassar from the University of Sydney Menzies Centre for Health Policy said: «While the association between being born earlier — lower gestational age — and poorer developmental outcomes is well established, our results revealed that poor development is further exacerbated in the case of planned birth, where a considered decision made to deliver an infant determines gestational age.
The good - government group Common Cause vehemently disagreed with Gov. Andrew Cuomo's assertion on Monday in a radio interview that the U.S. Supreme Court decision in the Citizens United case made it impossible for major campaign - finance law changes.
Productive third - party involvement designed to alter the confrontational foreign policy narrative as well as a structural environment that allows enough leverage for domestic decision makers (elected civilian leadership in Pakistan's case) to implement and enforce new policies are also imperative for change to happen.
He also defended the way he raised campaign contributions from the developers implicated in the alleged schemes as well as a decision to segregate the money they gave — roughly $ 350,000 — until the case is resolved.
We call on President Nana Akufo - Addo to direct a reversal of these illegal decisions and acts of malfeasance as well as take appropriate steps to restore good corporate governance practices in our state - owned enterprises, in this case ADB.
«The best interest of the child would always be a primary consideration in any decision to return the child,» he said, adding that each case would be considered on an individual basis to ensure the child was properly looked after on their return.
Asked to comment on the decision of the apex court in the notorious Montie 3 case, Justice Akuffo, who was appointed to the Supreme Court on November 30, 1995 by then president Jerry John Rawlings, said a nation without a good justice system could easily break down.
Today's report rejects the case that there was ever a golden era of politics - pointing out that in the second world war, only one third of people believed politicians took decisions in the best interests of the country.
Relations between de Blasio and the police unions have never been good but have worsened in recent months after a grand jury's decision not to indict an NYPD officer in the Eric Garner case and the murders last month of two officers in Brooklyn.
«As the EU continues to develop we need to be absolutely clear when it is most appropriate to take decisions at the national or local level, closer to the people affected, and in other cases when it is best to take action at the EU or global level,» Hague said.
As, it is the case in all matters, the decision by Nana Addo is better late than never.»
At a press conference addressing the Rev. Al Sharpton's tax troubles as well as the pending grand jury decisions in the Michael Brown case in Ferguson, Missouri and the Eric Garner case in Staten Island, a reporter identified himself as being from Fox 5, the local Fox station.
Sean Ryan [email protected] The Wisconsin Department of Transportation had better fix its public hearing process and justify its decisions or it will end up back in court, according to grass - roots organizers who won a federal case against the state.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z