This graph represents pretty
good decisions in every case.
If you make these decisions with the advice of a knowledgeable and successful attorney, you will make
good decisions in your case.
The thought of having well over a million dollars in debt service (11,200 a month back then because we are in a very high tax area) when I could buy half a dozen properties with cash and not make a lot of money but enough, and still have them to rent out or even sell to generate income seems a lot
better decision in my case, but not in all cases.
Not exact matches
While most of us think that making
decisions rationally — with piles of statistics and numbers and other evidence to back us up — is the
best way to go,
in reality, this is often not the
case.
In the current challenging economic environment, a company's worst -
case scenarios might include the bankruptcy of its biggest and once -
best customer, a banker's
decision to close down its corporate credit line, the postponement or cancellation of an impending initial public offering, or the meltdown of a company's value.
In any
case, testing gives you a much
better idea of what is truly happening with shopping - cart
decisions, and how to optimize the entire mobile shopping experience to make the register ring this holiday season.
This
decision probably shouldn't have been a surprise, because it basically said that the court's 2010
decision in the Citizens United
case, upholding the right of corporations to spend money
in federal elections, applies to the states as
well.
Reckless ambition It's important that investors are level - headed
in their
decision making, because what looks like a
good investment on the surface may not be the
case.
Canada managed the financial storm of 2008
better than others because we anticipated risks and acted proactively with public policy foresight, responsible oversight of our financial industry, and
better decisions and performance by financial service providers and our clients than was the
case in other countries.
For example, as has been the
case in all 19 years the survey has been conducted, a very large majority, 91 % of survey respondents, reported that creating employee ownership through an ESOP was «a
good business
decision that has helped the company.»
Since the survey's beginnings 20 years ago, and the
case in all the years the survey has been conducted even
in 2009, a very large majority, 92.2 % of survey respondents, reported that creating employee ownership through an ESOP was «a
good business
decision that has helped the company.»
I've written elsewhere (and will have more to say soon, since I've got a lecture deadline) about the Supreme Court's quite breathtaking (
in a
good way)
decision in the Arizona tuition tax credit
case.
It may
well be the
case that God so respects the «humanity» of each particular individual that he will seldom, if ever, override those
decisions which are significant
in an individual's own life history, even if the actualization of such
decisions will negatively affect large numbers of people.
If, therefore, we discuss future human structures and institutions of the Church which would make possible a more active participation of the laity
in the
decisions of ecclesiastical authorities, such efforts should not be discredited
in advance by saying that they would remain
in any
case subject to the
good pleasure of the hierarchy.
Either an argument is cogent enough
in itself to bring about this
decision, or else it is not cogent at all, and if this is the
case, no number of
good additional reasons can ever justify such a
decision.
In this
case the devotional speaker is admired for his art, his eloquence, while that
decision of which each man is capable, and that which it may be
well to note, is the highest thing of all, is completely ignored.
But since this is the
case with God, we can speak meaningfully of a divine enrichment by accomplished
good in creation, and we can also allow for what might be styled a divine sadness because of wrong creaturely
decisions and what they bring about.
If we adopt the latter position, as I believe we should, then we must ask whether
in the
case of temporal occasions as
well the ontological principle allows that their own
decisions can be explanatory of conceptual prehensions not derived from physical prehensions.
And while it is obviously possible that such
decision may be erroneous
in any given
case, still the evil effect following it, being limited to that particular
case, with the chance that it may be overruled and never become a precedent for other
cases, can
better be borne than could the evils of a different practice.
In short, this is a
case of Hobby Lobby not trusting their employees to be able to make
good choices for themselves and so decided to deny their employees their personal religious freedom of making health
decisions without interference from their employer.
If we adopt the later position, as I believe we should, then we must ask whether
in the
case of temporal occasions as
well the ontological principle allows that their own
decisions can be explanatory of conceptual prehensions not derived from physical prehensions.
It is always
better to decide
in advance
in case you want surplus when taking a
decision on what quantity to buy.
In many
cases, those
decisions align with efficiency numbers that suggest the power teams really were
better than the ones they beat out.
I suppose it is a
case of seeing how he does
in pre-season and then making a
decision but it is probably
best to try and find a
good loan spell for him.
It's a tough
decision for WENGER to make, but at the end he will need to let Jack go; sadly I am sure he will do
well in a different team, unfortunately will never be the
case with ARSENAL.
If this were the
case then for the first time
in a lifetime someone else will be making the
decisions and if this is the
case they may
well choose to sign no one this window, instead doing the negotiations for signings as soon as the season is over and after liaising with Wenger's successor.
«I have a pretty
good idea of what I think the starting lineup will be
in our first playoff game, but I've got
decision to make
in case we've got injuries.»
Selling him abroad this season to me will be one of Wenger's
best and most brave
decisions ever.He'll get my respect tor that.Who says we can't win the league with another player
in his position?Have faith for all is not lost.The Van Persie
case ws very different since at that time we were not financially strong and couldn't replace having to settle for second rate players except Cazorla at that time.
In this
case we can actually replace him.I can still see Arsenal getting Lemar because we still have a lot of money for transfers.If we can't get Lemar we should try other options for there's always
better.
I take your point but rvp and fab would say that Vardy had a much easier
decision, he had already won the PL, they had to move away to win it, ond
in fabs
case, win a lot more as
well.
I think its time to do something about this, over the 2 legs, ireland were clearly the
better side, that notwithstanding this particular french team is the worst i've seen
in decades, and they have no bussines going to the world cup.It is time for replays to be reviewed
in some
cases and goaline technology to be applied
in other
cases, i think we human being have come of age to realise that we humans are not perfect, no matter how hard we try, so for sepp blatter to keep resisting replays and goal line technology is quite baffling to me, i can't really understand why 3 socalled officials could make a
decision, a
decision in which the whole world saw to be a foul, and its allowed to stand, and a nation is left, heartbroken, cheated and bitter, i am an african, but as a fan of football, i felt terrible seeing this, and i beg the question, if someone other than the team is not benefiting from this, why can't the officials be allowed to take a look at the replays
in order to officiate the game
better?
It was a hard
decision to make, but it was
better to make it
in high school than to stretch out the drama, up the ante on the tension, or
in the worst
case scenario: to burn out and to lose my passion for learning at a school where I really didn't belong.
And wishing harm (or negelct,
in this
case) on another human being does NOT make you any
better than someone who makes a hard
decision to give up an animal.
In other
cases, however, adoptive parents choose to keep their deliberations to themselves and only share their
decision when the adoption is
well underway.
However, there are other times when a
well - thought out
decision isn't what we thought it would be,
in which
case we may need to just dig
in our heels and ride the wave of uncertainty or even, inconvenience, until this newfound «whim» or thoughtful
decision turns into newfound conviction.
In the best case scenario, a teen has overscheduled himself because he truly loves the activities in which he's involved — but even that situation doesn't mean that it's a healthy decisio
In the
best case scenario, a teen has overscheduled himself because he truly loves the activities
in which he's involved — but even that situation doesn't mean that it's a healthy decisio
in which he's involved — but even that situation doesn't mean that it's a healthy
decision.
Don't you think these types of
decisions are
best made
case - by -
case, with the child's
best interest
in mind, looking at different angles, etc?
Parental Rights: Toolkit & Educational Resources Women's Refugee Commission Provides step - by - step instructions and resources to help migrant parents protect and maintain their parental rights and make
well - informed, critical
decisions regarding the care and welfare of their children
in immigration
cases.
The study's senior author, Associate Professor Natasha Nassar from the University of Sydney Menzies Centre for Health Policy said: «While the association between being born earlier — lower gestational age — and poorer developmental outcomes is
well established, our results revealed that poor development is further exacerbated
in the
case of planned birth, where a considered
decision made to deliver an infant determines gestational age.
The
good - government group Common Cause vehemently disagreed with Gov. Andrew Cuomo's assertion on Monday
in a radio interview that the U.S. Supreme Court
decision in the Citizens United
case made it impossible for major campaign - finance law changes.
Productive third - party involvement designed to alter the confrontational foreign policy narrative as
well as a structural environment that allows enough leverage for domestic
decision makers (elected civilian leadership
in Pakistan's
case) to implement and enforce new policies are also imperative for change to happen.
He also defended the way he raised campaign contributions from the developers implicated
in the alleged schemes as
well as a
decision to segregate the money they gave — roughly $ 350,000 — until the
case is resolved.
We call on President Nana Akufo - Addo to direct a reversal of these illegal
decisions and acts of malfeasance as
well as take appropriate steps to restore
good corporate governance practices
in our state - owned enterprises,
in this
case ADB.
«The
best interest of the child would always be a primary consideration
in any
decision to return the child,» he said, adding that each
case would be considered on an individual basis to ensure the child was properly looked after on their return.
Asked to comment on the
decision of the apex court
in the notorious Montie 3
case, Justice Akuffo, who was appointed to the Supreme Court on November 30, 1995 by then president Jerry John Rawlings, said a nation without a
good justice system could easily break down.
Today's report rejects the
case that there was ever a golden era of politics - pointing out that
in the second world war, only one third of people believed politicians took
decisions in the
best interests of the country.
Relations between de Blasio and the police unions have never been
good but have worsened
in recent months after a grand jury's
decision not to indict an NYPD officer
in the Eric Garner
case and the murders last month of two officers
in Brooklyn.
«As the EU continues to develop we need to be absolutely clear when it is most appropriate to take
decisions at the national or local level, closer to the people affected, and
in other
cases when it is
best to take action at the EU or global level,» Hague said.
As, it is the
case in all matters, the
decision by Nana Addo is
better late than never.»
At a press conference addressing the Rev. Al Sharpton's tax troubles as
well as the pending grand jury
decisions in the Michael Brown
case in Ferguson, Missouri and the Eric Garner
case in Staten Island, a reporter identified himself as being from Fox 5, the local Fox station.
Sean Ryan
[email protected] The Wisconsin Department of Transportation had
better fix its public hearing process and justify its
decisions or it will end up back
in court, according to grass - roots organizers who won a federal
case against the state.