Sentences with phrase «good faith without»

On its face, the incident read as confirmation of many people's worst fears — that the online platforms we live on are manipulating us, using the personal information we provided in good faith without our knowledge.

Not many people would take the position that there is a duty to negotiate in good faith without an express contractual commitment to do so.

Until such time as you're willing to open your mind and debate in good faith without the repeated use of glaring logical fallacies, you're welcome to find some other blog at which to comment.

It seems like I can't argue for it in good faith without using a fallacy or two, yet I can't be expected to become an expert such that I could reasonably draw my own logical conclusions.

It seems to me that many scientists participated in the IPCC in good faith without looking too closely at the larger political machine in which they were merely cogs.

Not exact matches

(They can try to fire him for «Cause», but that is very, very difficult, and requires proving that he is «willfully or deliberately» acting «in bad faith and without reasonable belief that the Founder's action or inaction was in the best interests of the corporation.»)

The end result is bad faith infringement threats and licensing demands that cost companies significant money to litigate or settle without any addition to the public good.

All information is given in good faith and without warranty and should not be considered investment advice or an offer of any security for sale.

This article does not apply to any visual or sound radio broadcasting station, to any internet service provider or commercial online service, or to any publisher of a newspaper, magazine, or other publication, who broadcasts or publishes, including over the Internet, an advertisement in good faith, without knowledge of its false, deceptive, or misleading character.

In this agreement, «Confidential Information» means all confidential information relating to a party or its business, strategies, pricing, personnel, suppliers, products or services, but excludes information that the recipient proves: (a) was lawfully in its possession before receiving it from the discloser, (b) was provided in good faith to it by a third party without breaching any of discloser's rights or any rights of a third party, or (c) is or becomes generally available to the public through no fault of the recipient.

I was always taught that Faith (just believing) without works (doing good) was dead.

In doing so, Hitchens summed up the mantras of the new atheism: that «faith is a fairy tale», that it is possible to be «good without God» and that religion is not just false, but evil.

>> >» Humans are perfectly capable of loving others and doing good deeds without faith to «compel» them.»

David it is wierd because its not your faith, just like someone dressing without showing their face in the muslim religion (well not somoene but an oppressed female) might sound wierd to others.

Better yet, prove that your particular brand of Christianity is the true faith of Christians without using the Bible as your source since most Christian faith traditions use the same exact Bible.

On the contrary, we as Believers of Christ are well aware of what a life without faith in Him amounts to.

Sure, their motives were good, but if you yourself are a person of faith, would you want someone initiating you (posthumously, so clearly without your authorization) into a religion with views incompatible with your own?

As our family went through the loss of my son's good friend in a tragic accident last week, we remarked on how terribly difficult it was, and how impossibly difficult it must be for atheists to go through the trials of life without the faith and hope to guide them through.

Your comment is interesting because in the midst of begging for respect for your own views and claiming to respect the views of atheists you imply without faith or the «spirit» they lack strength, will, a positive outlook, morality and a desire to do good.

Aside from all this, the bible says Faith without works is DEAD... just being a good person is NOT enough to truly follow Jesus Christ and do the will of God.

It was written by many people over the span of hundreds of years, it is tribal rules from the infancy of our development and arguably is not a good book at all but full of hatred, spite and unspeakable violence, and you arent allowed to use «faith» as your proof of existence... faith is nothing less than the throwing away of reason i.e. belief without evidence.

You are a sad delusional brainwashed idiot and the world would be a better place without the ridiculousness of «Faith», which by the way should be replaced with the word «Fear».

Without denying the place that Protestant reformers occupy in evangelical faith, it should be said that classic Christian teaching, whether in the realm of doctrine or ethics, is best defined not against the backdrop of the sixteenth century, but rather in the light of the broader apostolic tradition.

The internet is the best new thing, (for we atheists, who can now talk science and reason without fear of murder by the faithful) Those who are still clinging to faith and delusion NEED HELP.

Atheists can be moral, happy, financially successful, kind, have good families, be charitable, and so on, all without having to profess faith in god no one can show exists.

Good works follow and faith without works is dead.

the proof i will require... (i.e. nothing on taking things without proof; better known as faith) 1 KINGS VERSE 30 - 40

I deeply believe that we will not get to the best outcome for children in poor communities without faith communities taking a stand.

In the graciousness of the book (something often lacking when people engage Emergent, no names but...), in its passionate for the Scriptures, in its understanding that true faith shows itself in love, in its acceptance of the many things postmodernism has going for it without capitulating to todays culture, and especially in the willingness to both take on and unite both sides, Wittmer has written something here to be commended for, and something that all believers no matter what side they lean toward would do well to read.

Theology study requires absolutely zero faith, in fact it's best studied without faith to get a non-biased viewpoint.

This is certainly an interesting article which raises a legitimate question for those of faith as well as for those without any specific spiritual belief system: Does God care who wins and if so, why and how much and what influence does He have over the outcome?

Faith is only one thing: belief without good reason.

Personally i think those specific prayers are a distraction most of the times we pray these prayers because its what we think we need and often thats not the case.The better way is to just trust the holy spirit let him lead i think we miss the awesomeness of doing it Gods way its easy not difficult.The struggle is difficult when we are walking by the flesh and trying to do it our way.When i got to the point where i said to the God i am not going to do it my way anymore and i submit to you because know whats best for me.Change me and when i feel the wrong desires or temptation to walk by the flesh i just say Lord you know i am weak and i can not live a christian life without you help me.As soon as i do that it is effortless theres no struggle thats how we should grow.I am excited with what God is doing in my life he has opened his word i am seeing the fruit of his life impacting mine and i am changing day by day.I am walking by faith and not slipping back into my old desires i know what it means to be an overcomer sin does not have dominion over me anymore.In myself i can not boast because it is the power of God at work in my life and i give all the praise back to God.brentnz

Come away from the childish life and grow up... faith is belief without evidence and it's probably a good thing you're not voting... children don't belong at the polling stations!

But its apparent low priority makes the case of economics a good trial for the thesis that the reason of the social sciences fails without the support of faith.

I can be without fear, I can be pacific, irenic, for faith gives to me the surety that the hungry are filled with good things and the humble exalted, and so I need not be resentful, or self - enclosed, or placatory, but rather I strive to understand, as my fellows do, whether they are men of faith or not.

An intimation of better times appeared in February 2015 when, shortly after Obama's visit, Modi broke a long silence and, to the dismay of hardliners, proclaimed, «My government will ensure that there is complete freedom of faith and that everyone has the undeniable right to retain or adopt the religion of his or her choice without coercion or undue influence.»

In this regard St. Augustine truly reflected the early Christian faith at its best — «Give me Thine own self, without which, though Thou shouldst give me all that ever Thou hast made, yet could not my desires be satisfied.»

Our communities — and, indeed, communities around the globe — would be much worse off without these organizations and their faith - informed good works.

Certainly it must be tempting to look at all you're doing without, especially in comparison to much of our affluent society, and to feel that you are better, that you have demonstrated your faith and devotion — maybe even to feel you have done your part.

The book, which just released last week, explores the intersection of faith, politics, and sexuality in America in a way that is thought - provoking, well - researched, colorful, and deeply personal without being indulgent.

Kev, I don't know what you mean by «it,» when you were describing belief without proof (faith) and you say «it» is better than «nothing.»

Ogden also states that Christian faith could be explicated as a doctrine of God just as well as it could as a certain possibility of self - understanding, ibid., 170; Christ Without Myth, 148

Without belief that both government and the market will act in a good rather than an evil fashion — that they deserve our trust — we can not have faith in the future.

This, of course, does not mean that there; is, avoidably as well as unavoidably, much that is «undemocratic» in the Church, if for no other reason than that the baptized children must slowly be led by the Church to a free and responsible decision of personal faith without which no adult can be a member of the Church in the fullest sense.

That's why people of all religions insist on the importance of faith, i.e. believing things for no good reason, without a shred of evidence.

Harold Camping KNOWS without a shadow of a doubt that Jesus is coming on Saturday, just like I know that the Mormon faith was the only true church... well he will be wrong on saturday... will Mormons ever admit they are wrong even if Jesus never comes?

What is knowledge without faith seen in good works.

To argue in good faith, to criticize with grace, to demolish without malice» every writer should aspire to such heights.

According to the knowledge, competence, and prestige which they [the laity] possess, they have the right and even at times the duty to manifest to the sacred pastors their opinion on matters which pertain to the good of the Church and to make their opinion known to the rest of the Christian faithful, without prejudice to the integrity of faith and morals, with reverence toward their pastors, and attentive to common advantage and the dignity of persons.