Sentences with phrase «good gamble for»

Not exact matches

What about small businesses, the biggest companies have the financial clout to make their calculated good dead, but is it too much of a gamble for small business owners.

Running illegal gambling operations, including recruiting people for foreign gaming junkets, was their main business, according to previously unreported court documents in China obtained by Bloomberg Markets as well as interviews with family members and former business partners.

But, even if the sports are deemed gambling, Sabino pointed out that it does not mean DFS is done for good.

A good example is Calvin Ayre, a giant in the world of gambling, who first laid the groundwork for Bodog in 1992 to study the market, and wisely built it into a empire turning himself into a billionaire.

These changes could mean even more growth, but they also represent a series of gambles for a company that has done very well by keeping things so simple for so long.

He also wanted to create a tech hub in a city better known for gambling and tourism, which some journalists dubbed the newest «techtopia.»

With thousands of crypto coins like Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, Zcash etc. to trade for, investing into a blockchain could pay off, but it may prove to be a gamble as a better coin could be made anytime.

When asked if this is the best use of gambling revenue, most Canadians would rather see the money earmarked for specific purposes.

That said, Bitcoins are now accepted in a wide range of industries, including the gambling industry for online casinos such as those reviewed here, which bodes well for its usage and popularity.

While they do not pay taxes on gambling revenues, they must use the majority of the proceeds for the common good of the tribe.

Without squeezing an avocado yourself, smelling a piece of fish to make sure it's at peak freshness, or picking out the best tender fresh herbs for green sauce, you're taking a gamble.

I love to warm the cake up just before I serve it, but always take a gamble on how long for and at what temperature — can anyone more experienced than me recommend a good time / temp for warming?

Would have liked to see Southampton take a gamble and replace Schneiderlin with the much more talented Diaby, and for it to work out well.

If for some miracle Diaby impresses and Wenger takes another gamble it better be a pay as you play.

IF that ms true it's about 125 m and for me he's worth what ever, people moan about wenger (me inc) but some say he won't spend and this kids a gamble he's with it in 5 years he could be worth 300m Put him alongside Sanchez or buy dembele and a top top Dm we are better than spuds and Liverpool just a little more and we will be back

Next season Wellington Silva may be ready for us, we don't know how well he will do in England... a gamble but lets not forget about him?

I still don't understand why Wenger didn't opt for Jansenn, at # 12 million he offered great value and potentially he could turn out to be the next best thing to come out of Holland, never the less at the price, he definitely was worth the gamble.

Kev You only need to look at a player qualities to acknowledge if the signing has a good chance of making it... of course everything is gamble in football.injuries, home sickness, family issues, the PL fast pace football etc... if you've seen arsenal play long enough you can spot which players are suited for our system and which ones aren't.

There is no need to gamble at time of the league, let give Maitland - Niles a chance and i know he will perform well in that position than other crop of players for that position.

You could theorize it going shitty both ways, but both teams accepted the gamble as the best alternative for their future.

Injuries in pre-season have cost them — Rob Holding is a good prospect but nowhere near ready and Calum Chambers came in as a right - back from Southampton — but it is still a big gamble to pay # 30m for Shkodran Mustafi from Valencia or # 40m for Atletico Madrid's Jose Gimenez.

For now, though, it looks like an oddly timed gamble, at best.

It is certainly not a good enough gamble, in my opinion, for a first round pick.

If he can rediscover that kind of form then he could be a decent acquisition for the reigning Premier League champions, but it's still a gamble with his impact in England in mind as Chelsea would arguably be better off going with a safer option.

He wanted to come to us, cost less than Xhaka — idiotic gamble on Xhaka (who is a good player btw) instead of buying Premiership experienced, marathon man Kante, for less!!!! Total and utter idiocy.

* Playing Theo is the hardest thing to watch, would rather gamble with Neilson * The Ox would do a better job than Bellerin at RWB * Kola should be playing LWB * Ramsey is a different player when he starts & being an impact sub * Giroud & Laca should start together especially physical (away) games * Ozil is good but... well maybe should rotate with Iwobi * Xhaka should work on reducing costly errors * can't trust Monreal, seems like a target for our opponents wherever he plays they wan na go thru him!!!

Williams would be a gamble for Fernando, and if he's going to gamble, then surely sticking with the McLaren - Honda package would be his best bet.

Payet also isn't getting any younger and with just one good season in the Premier League it may be a big gamble for Arsene Wenger to make.

The problem positions for me are Walcott and Coq, yes we may do well if both remain fit, but that is a big gamble for me, and one that we don't need to take — so the question is why are we taking it?

With Monaco being famous for the casinos, I suppose there is no better place for Arsenal to roll the dice and have a gamble.

All that is just as well really, because the search for a new manager, which seems ever more necessary after the loss to Liverpool and Wenger's tactical «gamble» of dropping our best player, may be complicated by the fact that the current La Liga champions Barcelona are also looking for a new head coach.

I like both Welbeck and Lucas but don't really understand why we got them as Welbeck wasn't an improvement and Lucas was a gamble because he is 28 and only 1 good season (also he hardly starts even though he has performed well) we should have got a WC Forward in past few years Now we have: Alexis, Giroud, Welbeck, Lucas, Iwobi, Ox, Walcott, Akpom, Sanogo, Campbell We are collecting average to good players (except Alexis who is WC) In order to get another WC forward we need to get rid of a few of the above for funds and clear up wages.

If it is true that we had a budget of around 100, I would have preferred to gamble on Holding and Chambers until Gabriel comes back and sign a better striker for 50 million or so.

I support you on the fact that Araenal need a player who can make an immediate impact.However, it's also naive to try to create an impression that he's going to fail due to similar playing style and stature of the players you mentioned above.Even Eduardo would have world class and possibly better than Van Persie if not for his leg breaking.It's likely Mbappe is going to succeed and if he gets signed up by another club we'll be chasing him on the future.The same gamble being taken on Mbappe is the same that was taken on Henry.If Henry had failed I don't think Arsenal would've been this great club today.This is a very similar situation to Mbappe.Weneed players now to have an immediate impact but we should not be inclined to think Mbappe would fail if Arsenal should sign him.

For the wages we pay Wenger, we could pay one of the best managers in the world, while any manager will be a gamble I do feel that gamble can be less risk if research done fully and finding someone who has shown they can do it over a obscure name could attract players.

You don't get it do you?I'm not even talking about the money.But I agree with you that for the kind of money that will be spent on Mbappe it's a higher gamble.Henry was bought to be a starter and as the main man for Arsenal.He was so young by then and the pressure on him was massive.Looking at the impact he's had in our club if Henry had failed who would imagine what Arsene would have done.To me he's our best player ever.Arsene put a lot of trust in him to be honest but the gamble paid off.However, I think he had a point to prove to world and to Juve hence he succeeded.The same as is with Mbappe with even a higher transfer fee and more expectation.If he's ever signed for that amount he's coming here to be the main man whowill send us into glory.Forget Ozchez for all eyes will be on him.

For consecutive seasons we'd sell our best players and take gambles on players who didn't work out, while the failures / deadwood rotted in reserves getting paid the same money as our starters each week.

This is because the signing of the 21 year old Lemar by Arsenal this summer is a hopeful gamble that may come off which Le Prof will be taking as Lemar only had one medium good goals scoring form for Lyon last season in the French Lig I and that doesn't prove yet he'll be a regular top goals scoring scorer for Arsenal if he joins us next season.

The hefty transfer fee attached to any permanent transfer would represent a big gamble by a club still struggling to get the best out of another expensive acquisition, Angel Di Maria, who joined for # 59.7 m from Real Madrid last summer.

A gamble, but only on loan, Radamel Falcao could prove a really smart signing for Chelsea if he can rediscover his best form.

He may have divided opinion at Liverpool, but 9/1 Brendan Rodgers could be worth a gamble for the Gunners as he guarantees entertaining, attack - minded football and seems to know how to get the best out of young players.

UK Football's ruling body decided, after a three - month review, that it could not in good conscience enforce stringent anti-gaming regulations for players and coaches if it was at the same time raking in millions to promote gambling firms.

I know allot of fans including myself think it is a ridiculous amount to pay for Martial, but with the hunt for top strikers proving a scarcely difficult thing to find well maybe gambles like that should be taken.

Even at such a bargain price the investment made by Brendan Rodgers in January 2013 was still something of a gamble, though perhaps less so than subsequent deals for the likes of Mario Balotelli, and the Northern Irishman has done well to nurture Coutinho and show him enough faith to help the player mature into a real world - class talent.

The fact is that it may have been more of a gamble if Coquelin hadn't got any game time and had spent the last five months in the reserves, so it was definitely a good experience for the Frenchman to play at Charlton.

Any of them would be a good fit, for me gambling on Simeone would be a great addition but unsure he'd come unless he really wanted to test himself in the premier league.

There's a good chance that we could see a similar gamble developing on the chances of the selection, who looks the possible number one for the St Leger for the powerful yard (he's an 8/1 poke currently).

Well it was always a gamble playing second string team against a decent first team, but I think its a blessing in disguise for two reasons.

And for 20 million Vardy, a much better finisher and fighter in my book, is not a bad gamble.

Because he hates to spend, he is toying with the idea of gambling with the inexperienced youngsters he has used during pre season by using them for the kick off of our seasons campaign hoping that the gamble would pay off in the first few games of the season before the transfer window shuts, so that he would have a good excuse not to buy proven quality.