I think that's it's a shame because it could have been
a good haunted house film, however this is a highly forgettable affair, one that is sure to disappoint any viewer looking for genuine scares.
But you forgot
the BEST haunted house film of the lot: THE CHANGELING with George C. Scott.
Not exact matches
Nothing wrong with that, however considering that the plot revolves around a
haunted house and Hearse, the
film could have been much
better than it is.
They forget that the original
film version of «The
Haunting» (based on Shirley Jackson's truly terrifying «The
Haunting of Hill
House») worked so
well because of what the audience didn't see.
Of course, this still might be somewhat forgivable if De Bont and first - time screenwriter David Self didn't openly acknowledge their inspirations for the
film — the wonderfully creepy 1963 movie of the same name, as
well as its source, the novel «The
Haunting of Hill
House.»
It's hard to separate a sequel from its original counterpart, especially with a movie like The Conjuring, which is quite simply one of the very
best haunted house movies ever — not only that, but it pretty much set the bar for all future
films of its ilk; that's a hell of an accomplishment, to say the least.
Given that neither of the A
Haunted House films are
better than the worst of the Scary Movie franchise, that's a gripe that is likely to fall on deaf ears.
It's hard to separate a sequel from its original counterpart, especially with a movie like The Conjuring, which is quite simply one of the very
best haunted house movies ever — not only that, but it pretty much set the bar for all future
films of its ilk; that's a hell of an accomplishment, to say the -LSB-...]
The Innkeepers Easily one of my favorite
films of last year (it even made my top ten list), Ti West's take on the
haunted house is equal parts
well - played comedy and atmospheric horror, and both parts work perfectly.
At its
best, the
film functions as a Hitchcockian
haunted house movie with a palpable air of mystery, intrigue, elegant set pieces and offers up exquisite period details.
The story — which simply has the characters from the first
film stay in a
haunted house — is supposed to get its (for lack of a
better term) «inspiration» from thrillers of a supernatural bent such as The
Haunting, What Lies Beneath, Poltergeist, and The Exorcist.
Yeah, you read that right: the long - delayed Amityville: The Awakening, directed by Franck Khalfoun (who made the remake of Maniac) is the 18th
film in the mostly direct - to - video franchise, 19th if you count Conjuring 2, and maybe 20th if you count My Amityville Horror, the genuinely disturbing documentary about the troubled son of George and Kathy Lutz, the couple whose
haunted -
house claims were detailed in Jay Anson's
best - seller.
Not as commendable were the slick but forgettable Leatherface, the first disappointment by French filmmaking duo Alexandre Bustillo and Julien Maury; the Spierig Brothers» Jigsaw, part 8 of the exhausted Saw series; the dull Amityville: The Awakening by Franck Khalfoun, usually a respectable genre director, who does still add his share of clever touches (and meta moments, like when a group of teenagers watch the original Amityville Horror in the «real» Amityville
haunted house, into which one's family has just moved); Open Water 3: Cage Dive, whose shark - franchise designation was tacked on as an afterthought, not that it helped to draw in audiences (in an anemic year for great whites, 47 Meters Down takes the prize for the
best shark
film); Jeepers Creepers 3, a super-limited release — surely in part because of director Victor Salva's history as a convicted child molester — which just a tiny bit later would probably have been shelved permanently in light of the slew of reprehensible - male - behavior outings in recent months.