As I understand it, though, it's considered
good judicial practice to acknowledge adopted prose as the work of counsel.
Not exact matches
If you have a law degree, this is a great opportunity to identify and review legislative and
judicial best practice developments in areas including public safety and risk management.
So the Supreme Court, when it
practices judicial activism, undercuts democratic participation not only by substituting its own assertoric judgment for democratic deliberation, or by ignoring the plain letter of the constitution in favor of its own political inclinations, but also by understanding itself as a council of philosopher kings (versus really
good lawyers) prudentially adjusting the fundamental nature of American democracy to fit the ever changing historical horizon that provides the context for its expression.
What is lacking in our electoral system is a strict adherence to global
best practice in terms of voter education, sanctity of the ballot, a seamless collation of votes and a fast
judicial process for those seeking redress.
PLC's, attendance rewards, 85 % attendance rule, supportive
judicial system, and supportive school board are some of the entities for building our
best practices.
Works such as Field of Corn (with Osage Orange Trees) in Dublin, the Goodale Park Fountain, and In Principle & in
Practice at the Ohio
Judicial Center have gained Cochran a
well - deserved reputation as a sculptor to know in central Ohio and beyond.
To foster greater access to the
judicial process, this project will create a laboratory in a Boston courtroom to help establish
best practices for digital coverage that can be replicated and adopted throughout the nation.
The changes proposed in the Immigration Bill and the changes due to be implemented as a result of the Transforming Legal Aid exercise may
well be the final straw for many immigration firms, whose post-LASPO business plans had been built, in part, around the continuation of their
judicial review
practice.
Mr. Amantea focuses his
practice on environmental, transactional and
judicial proceedings, as
well as product liability claims and other complex litigation.
Dan has also developed a diverse
practice in all areas of employment litigation, including wrongful dismissal actions, unlawful competition by departed employees, occupational health and safety, human rights,
judicial reviews, appeals as
well as seeking injunctive relief against unlawful picketing activity.
In my view, agreements for the sale of land include an implied term that the purchaser will receive a «
good and marketable title in fee simple» based on both conveyancing
practice (custom) and as a «legal incident» of such contracts — that is by implication of law based on the
judicial authorities cited herein (see para. 50).
Though appointed judges write higher - quality opinions, according to the study, elected judges write many more, and thus, the professors attributed the difference in quality to volume (I would also argue that very generally, federal
practice attracts more complex cases and a slightly higher quality of lawyer, which also contributes to the quality of the decision since in many cases, a
judicial decision is only as
good as the briefs on which it is based).
Last week, a much - different court marked the five - year anniversary of that report with a symposium on
best practices in
judicial administration that featured a keynote address by California Supreme Court Chief Justice Ronald M. George.
Even though the «Child's
Best Interests Principle» is considered by every country while deciding child issues, due to the differences in domestic laws and
judicial practice, the biggest difficulty is how to enforce the decisions ruled by courts from other legal jurisdictions by the actualities in China.
He is a frequent lecturer and author on subjects related to the substantive areas of his
practice, as
well as on litigation and trial
practice, legal and
judicial ethics, and current legal developments.
For sure, you can access labour codes and regulations on CanLII, as
well as the latest
judicial decisions addressing wrongful dismissal, but other sources are fundamental to the
practice of labour lawyers.
Here I'm struck by the contrast between the accounts of the prevalence of «whacking» and the
judicial response to it (e.g. that it is common and the courts / crowns rarely intervene) and accounts that I hear from
practicing crowns (e.g. that it is uncommon and, when it occurs, the court's response vigorously and, further, that the court, crown and police are uncommonly solicitous to complainants in sexual assault cases — a claim that the Ghomeshi cases seems to confirm given the seemingly
well - founded criticism of the police in that case for failing to adequately probe the complainant's allegations, meaning that inconsistencies in their statements were discovered on cross-examination by the defense, fatally undermining their credibility).
The Missouri system of evaluation was developed after the committee studied model rules and
best practices from the American Bar Association and more than 20
judicial performance evaluation systems in the nation.
The Missouri
judicial performance review process was developed after a committee studied model rules and
best practices from the American Bar Association and more than 20
judicial performance evaluation systems in the nation.
The
judicial practice concerned withforeign - related divorce is different from domestic divorces, which bring manyconfusions for the case parties in jurisdiction, filing cases, as
well asnotarization and authentication.
Selected as the Dallas Environmental Lawyer of the Year this year by The
Best Lawyers in America, Deatherage's
practice includes permitting, compliance, administrative law and
judicial litigation on a variety of environmental issues including, air emissions, wastewater discharges, hazardous waste, hazardous substances and toxic substances.
Marc also advises employers on
best practices to ensure compliance with employment standards and human rights legislation, and prepares employment contracts designed to survive
judicial scrutiny.
Membership is open to all attorneys who are admitted to
practice before the United States Court of the Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, as
well as all federal judges and federal
judicial clerks within the geographic area of the Eighth Circuit.
It should be considered
good practice to prepare a document setting out the investigatory scope, especially when
judicial review seems likely.
Our lawyers have counseled boards of directors and trustees on fund governance, the role of independent directors, their evaluation of fund service provider contracts and fees, their evaluation of fund and service provider compliance programs, affiliation and conflict of interest issues, current regulatory issues and industry
best practices, standards of conduct and of
judicial review of board action and compliance with all applicable disclosure requirements.
These efforts are often built on the reputation of this Court for employing «
judicial best practices» and the education offered internationally is seen as critical to the development of an impartial, competent, efficient and effective judiciary.
As this case demonstrates, the procedural boundaries of such
practices are not
well known, particularly in regard to whether
judicial approval for third - party funding agreements is required.
The CJI Implementation Plan is a multipronged effort that includes assistance in strategic planning for state
judicial leadership, education and technical assistance for state and local courts, evaluation of demonstration pilot projects to document the impact of
best practices, and the development of practical tools and instructions on effective implementation efforts.
However, social scientists have identified a demonstrable link between
judicial education and
judicial performance, which suggests it is vitally important to identify and improve on
best practices in
judicial education.
The guidance replaces the Statement of
Good Practice of November 2003 and should be treated as an integral part of applying the Protocol for
Judicial Case Management in Public Law Children Act Cases.
A major issue emerging from last year's government consultations on the issue was the role of fair dealing and the need to update the Copyright Act to
better conform with
judicial interpretation and general
practices.
EDRM (Electronic Discovery Reference Model), which is part of the Duke Law Center for
Judicial Stud - ies, is working with with members of the plaintiffs» and defense bar, as
well the judiciary, in drafting, editing, and reviewing
best practices or protocols that are in - tended to provide more direction on how to use TAR.
The panelists will include The Honourable Mr. Justice Colin L. Campbell of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Master Calum MacLeod of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, and legal practitioners such as Susan Wortzman, founder of Wortzman Nickle and the Chair of the Steering Committee of Sedona Conference ® Working Group 7, Sedona Canada, and Co-Chair of the Inaugural Program together with Kelly Friedman, a litigation partner with Ogilvy Renault LLP and Co-Chair of Sedona Canada Inaugural Conference, Dominic Jaar, legal counsel at Ledjit, an information management, e-discovery and law
practice management consulting firm, Jonathan Redgrave a founding partner of Redgrave Daley Ragan & Wagner and Steering Committee Chair Emeritus of The Sedona Conference ® Working Group on Electronic Document Retention and Production (WG1), as
well as Martin Felsky of Commonwealth Legal, David Gray, a partner in the Litigation Group of McCarthy Tétrault in Montréal, Glenn A. Smith, one of the five founding partners of Lenczner Slaght, Karen Groulx, a partner at Pallett Valo LLP, Peg Duncan, Department of Justice, Canada, Robert Deanne, a partner with Borden Ladner Gervais LLP in Vancouver, Ron Hudges of Nixon Peabody, Kenneth J. Withers, Director of
Judicial Education and Content for The Sedona Conference ®, as
well as other members of the bench and bar from both Canada and the U.S. Panel discussions will focus on 7 key areas:
the importance of establishing and refining standards and
best practices in how children are represented and their views and preferences heard in
judicial processes;
Cecelia Klingele spoke at the Massachusetts Superior Court
Judicial Conference on
best sentencing
practices.
The Law Journal is committed to providing all the information you need to
better your
practice, including in - depth analyses of case decisions, comprehensive coverage of our state's legal community, access to our verdict and settlement database and updated
judicial profiles.
The purpose of the LCA is to recognize deserving, experienced, and highly qualified lawyers, to provide an outlet for scholarly authorship of legal articles on trial and litigation
practice, to provide additional sources for professional development, to promote superior advocacy and ethical standards in the
practice of law, to assist in community involvement by its membership, and to advance a superior judiciary, by taking relevant positions on issues or legislation affecting
judicial compensation and / or benefits, as
well as those affecting the American litigation processes.
The guide is designed to assist healthcare providers, SUD treatment providers, child welfare programs and
judicial systems to improve their collaborative
practice, and to offer information about additional resources that will strengthen their capacity to provide coordinated,
best -
practice care and services Collaborative planning and implementation of services that reflect
best practices for treating opioid use disorders during pregnancy are yielding promising results in communities across the country..
The articles identify promising casework and legal and
judicial best practices, raise awareness of factors that reduce barriers to engagement, and explore policies that affect the engagement of nonresident fathers.
It is an important contribution to understanding the most common errors in
judicial practice and social policy in this arena, as
well as in mental health
practice.
The
best family lawyers, like us,
practice family law exclusively, they are State Certified and are highly rated by their peers and
judicial officers.
The Guidelines are intended as a
best practice guide for therapists, attorneys, other professionals and
judicial officers when there is a need for therapeutic interventions with court - involved children or parents.