Sentences with phrase «good justified reasons»

I can not determine anything that is first person, and you very well may have good justified reasons for your belief, and all I can say is that I don't have evidence to justify accepting the claim.

Not exact matches

There is no reason to take this type of concentrated risk in a portfolio; the investment opportunity set is just too big and readily available to justify being anything but well - diversified.

Schultz blames «nit - pickers» for failing to see the good from Alphabet — the strong quarterly sales growth — and profit - outlook - boosting Caterpillar, and for «grasping at reasons to justify the selloff.»

Chances are you've also justified not saving as much as you could or should by reasoning that your money is best spent now while you know you can enjoy it.

So, by your reasoning, if «People put so much importance on words» (implying that they don't matter and we shouldn't take thought of how we use them) then I ought to be able to sing along with the lyrics from pac's «hit»em up» with my black friends, curse in a kindergarten class as well as a corporate meeting for my boss... what impression would a client have of my boss if I were cussing in a professional meeting or at a charity event... it doesn't add up, it's a cop - out rebuttal... trying to find loopholes or applying «human reasoning» like» ll take a swearing guy who's helpful» doesn't change Jesus or scripture it's just setting up a what - if scenario and trying to allow that to in some way justify your stance when again, that doesn't change The Holy Spirit or His heart in those who have been born again... the verses (inspired by His own Spirit) speak for themselves.

This is in fact a resurgence in other terms and with other objectives in view — of the error always committed by Christians who intervene in the sphere of human actions to justify them and to testify that in the end man has good reason for doing what he does.

A Democrat being a Christian is nothing new... and a Democrat justifying policies with moral obligations is nothing new either, as well as Republicans questioning their policies for other reasons... Obama is not at all unique in this manner.

The reason i say the person has religion is that most people who commit this type of act try to justify the evil they do by saying it for the greater good that religion has taught them, but you never know and we wont till all the facts are in.

All the mass murderers of history have used lengthy reasoning to justify their killing, David Johnson is in good company and has risen to the highest ideals of atheism, total disregard for human life.

They then must use prudential reasoning to decide whether even a justified use of force would produce more good than harm, would have a reasonable hope of success, and would be the only course likely to be effective in achieving the justified ends.

For this as well as for other reasons C. F. Evans is justified in saying that John's version «would seem to represent an end - product of the development of the story of the empty tomb».32

«18 Hick has characterized this as an Irenaean type of theodicy which «accepts God's ultimate omni - responsibility and seeks to show for what good and justifying reason He has created a universe in which evil was inevitable.

Since whatever I feel is right, and good feelings are from God, I am always justified without recourse to tradition or reason.

Chris Stedman has written like a good athiest who is trying really hard to justify himself, although his reasoning is severly flawed and his conclusions totally unsubstantiated.

Either an argument is cogent enough in itself to bring about this decision, or else it is not cogent at all, and if this is the case, no number of good additional reasons can ever justify such a decision.

We may, by such reasoning, justify our use of any means to achieve what we think are good ends on the assumption that — since history is a perennial tragedy, and collective actions are always on a lower ethical level than individual actions — we are not obligated to strive for the highest ideals possible, or to present an alternative to the usual way of the world.

It's always best to be able to justify your reasons for believing in something.

These look so amazing and I've been hearing about them this whole season everywhere and I've just been needing a reason to justify spending the money on the hazelnuts and Christmas is a good reason!

Personally I'll go with Mahrez for the following reasons: - Fits better into Arsenal playing style - younger player who would cost exactly the same - Prem experience (look what Kante brought to Chelsea) Sure Turan would bring some toughness that Marhez doesn't but not enough to justify going for him.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

there is no doubting that Arsene has helped to provide us with some incredible footballing moments in the formative years of his managerial career at Arsenal, but that certainly doesn't and shouldn't mean that he has earned the right to decide when and how he should leave this club... there have been numerous managers at each of the biggest clubs in Europe throughout the last decade who have waged far more successful campaigns than ours yet somehow and someway each were given their walking papers because they failed to meet the standards laid out by the hierarchy of their respective clubs... of course that doesn't mean that clubs should simply follow the lead of others, especially if clubs of note have become too reactionary when it comes to issues of termination, for whatever reasons, but there should be some logical discourse when it comes to the setting of parameters for a changing of the guard... in the case of Arsenal, this sort of discourse was largely stifled when the higher - ups devised their sinister plan on the eve of our move to the Emirates... by giving Wenger a free pass due to supposed financial constraints he, unwittingly or not, set the bar too low... it reminds me of a landlord who says he will only rent to «professional people» to maintain a certain standard then does a complete about face when the market is lean and vacancies are up... for those who rented under the original mandate they of course feel cheated but there is little they can do, except move on, especially if the landlord clearly cares more about profitability than keeping their word... unfortunately for the lifelong fans of a football club it's not so easy to switch allegiances and frankly why should they, in most cases we have been around far longer than them... so how does one deal with such an untenable situation... do you simply shut - up and hope for the best, do you place the best interests of those with only self - serving agendas above the collective and pray that karma eventually catches up with them, do you run away with your tail between your legs and only return when things have ultimately changed, do you keep trying to find silver linings to justify your very existence, do you lower your expectations by convincing yourself it could be worse or do you stand up for what you believe in by holding people accountable for their actions, especially when every fiber of your being tells you that something is rotten in the state of Denmark

He has wowed the fans initially and there were enough reasons to believe that his transfer is well justified.

There are many justified reasons why Connor McDavid has widely been considered the best up - and - coming prospect since Sidney Crosby.

I just think about Gazidis and think he is not half the man Dein was in transfer dealings, I do not think he is good enough support for any manager we may have, we need a guy who can get a managers targets without expecting the manager to justify the purchase with economical reasoning.

You don't have to justify your baby's behavior with fancy labels or reasons for her waking (except perhaps, to yourself if it makes you feel better).

a bit disparaging maybe after she told me to go away (I questioned if she was qualified to portray herself as an expert in obstetrics, that was sort of mean, since she clearly sees herself as one) but it was sort of justified and I hate misleading numbers and if a lay person like me can see flaws in her reasoning, well, its got ta be bad.

Once again a mother who chose homebirth for no better reason than her «experience,» risked her baby's life, nearly killed him, subjected him to prolonged oxygen deprivation and may have sentenced him to a lifetime of developmental disability is now trying to justify that choice.

There is no good reason to justify this reckless and wasteful spending.

The two leaders highlighted benefits of the conference, justifying the reason why Africa was the best host for the 6th conference, the first outside Tokyo since 1993.

Connie then goes on to tell the e-mail recipients, who identified themselves to Obama's political operation as «seniors,» that «President Obama's plan for health insurance is good for seniors» and lists five major reasons to justify her claim.

«The regular study section is risk averse for a very simple, perfectly human reason: It's just easier to see how an incremental improvement in existing knowledge and an experiment which is very, very obviously feasible is a better use of the money to the average study section member than something which requires any kind of leap of faith or which is insufficiently justified, in their view.

By doing so, we could control for donor characteristics to better understand the reasons for discard, and whether concerns about using certain kidneys were justified.»

The problem is that when you start freaking out as well and fight it — or even worse trying to reason with it or justify it — it gets more powerful.

BENEFITS: When I started looking into fasting (mainly to justify my not - eating), I came across a few different reasons why the feast / fast worked so well; some had to do with fasting, obviously, but there was some stuff that had to do specifically with the cheat day as well.

The two reasons I say that are (a) it is on the higher end for carbohydrates, but great for a day when you have pushed to your personal best at the gym and (b) it is a bit costly and I could justify it for something special (ex: Christmas cookies or biscuits and gravy).

I justified this top on account of the slight boatneck and longer sleeve — both good reasons, no?

Plus, your upcoming bold makeup debut makes for an awfully good reason to justify your next Ulta beauty haul.

Plus, your upcoming bold makeup debut makes for an awfully good reason to justify your next

Not all that much happens, but the episodes nip along just smartly enough to sustain interest as to what this jigsaw puzzle will look like once assembled, the disclaimer being that viewers will have good reason to be ticked off if the payoff doesn't justify the commitment.

As if to justify Hathaway's good - guy status, it turns out the reason he's behind bars has nothing to do with his past computer - related hijinks, but rather some misguided show of chivalry.

While the animation isn't without its shortcomings (it lacks the detail and realism of Pixar as well as a solid artistic reason to justify that), the transfer itself is, as you'd expect, fairly flawless.

Harvard Graduate School of Education will work with the Strategic Education Research Partnership and other partners to complete a program of work designed to a) investigate the predictors of reading comprehension in 4th - 8th grade students, in particular the role of skills at perspective - taking, complex reasoning, and academic language in predicting deep comprehension outcomes, b) track developmental trajectories across the middle grades in perspective - taking, complex reasoning, academic language skill, and deep comprehension, c) develop and evaluate curricular and pedagogical approaches designed to promote deep comprehension in the content areas in 4th - 8th grades, and d) develop and evaluate an intervention program designed for 6th - 8th grade students reading at 3rd - 4th grade level.The HGSE team will take responsibility, in collaboration with colleagues at other institutions, for the following components of the proposed work: Instrument development: Pilot data collection using interviews and candidate assessment items, collaboration with DiscoTest colleagues to develop coding of the pilot data so as to produce well - justified learning sequences for perspective - taking, complex reasoning, academic language skill, and deep comprehension.Curricular development: HGSE investigators Fischer, Selman, Snow, and Uccelli will contribute to the development of a discussion - based curriculum for 4th - 5th graders, and to the expansion of an existing discussion - based curriculum for 6th - 8th graders, with a particular focus on science content (Fischer), social studies content (Selman), and academic language skills (Snow & Uccelli).

Strategies such as cooperative learning, requiring students to justify their answer with text or reason and other active learning techniques have been known and practiced in good schools for decades.

Such restrictions «may be justified where a school has good reason», such as «the promotion of cohesion».

But the Texas Education Agency notes that a court now can dismiss a charge against a parent of contributing to the truancy if a judge finds that the dismissal «would be in the best interest of justice» and the student is unlikely to continue skipping school or has a good reason justifying the absence.

With the definition of justified in the secular population meaning to have a good or legitimate reason, then yes some of the murders (the abusers) were justified.

One of the best reasons justifying a debt consolidation loan in peer lending is because you can refinance your bills into a fixed rate and with fixed terms.

The reason I think the rule of thumb is still good, despite the assumptions, is that I don't think a «more accurate» number based on a lot of unpredictable guesses is really better; and it may even be harmful if you use it to justify saving less, or even if you use it to save far too much.

So long as you can justify why you are doing this, and are very clear the reasons why this is the best choice for the animal, then you can live with it.

«Having a litter for the kids» is too casual a reason to justify the potential danger to the mother, the work of raising a litter and the responsibility to properly socialize the pups to become well - adjusted family members, and the responsibility of placing these precious lives in good homes.