Just like we don't hang around with women who are caught in the act of adultery, we don't hang around with Samaritans, we don't hang around with powerless children, we don't hang around with women who have a bad reputation, we don't hang around with beggars or the poor or the oppressed or the criminal or the possessed or the socially marginalized or the ones who aren't allowed to come to temple with
the good religious people, good gracious!
I too am an atheist, or at least agnostic, but I recognize that there are
good religious people and bad, that type or lack of religion have very little correlation to the goodness of a human being.
Surely God would not have «disciplined»
those good religious people for eating (way too much)!
So once again, you still have no idea how to separate
good religious people from hypocritical power mongers.
I have been put down and attacked by many «
good religious people».
Not exact matches
Even
people who aren't particularly
religious can still relate to how I see the greater
good, positivity and reaching high for it.
As social scientist Arthur Brooks has documented,
religious people give far more to all manner of do -
gooding than do secular
people.
The question is ridiculous, since yes, the
religious leaders (Jews) had a hand in killing Jesus, but the conclusion that modern Jews are responsible is also ridiculous, as
well as the insistence on retracting the question by the ADL, whose whole point is to prevent
people from blaming modern Jews, not whether the answer is true or not.
They've spent much time and effort courting
religious conservatives, knowing full
well that what some of these
people want is so extreme that it would scare off centrist voters.
But the fact is that if you even allow the words «
good» and «bad» into your thinking, you are a
religious person.
Good point by Alex, many
people who are deeply
religious (and orthodox Jews very much are), see times of fear and stress as
well as times of happiness and tranquility to be times to pray.
Recent studies indicate that
religious people are
better educated on average than secularists.
Please cite the research that shows that
religious people are «
religious people are much
better adjusted than those who refuse to believe.»
Religious people serve another master; they are
better able to serve their political communities.
I think that it would be
good if we non-believers could «come out», but not allow ourselves to be brought «down» to the level that some of the
religious people seem to function on.
They would be on much
better intellectual and moral ground if they just allowed for the fact that yes, the
religious Jews had Jesus killed so that they could protect their authority, but that as much to do with modern Jewish
people as the Romans killing the Maccabees has to do with modern Italians — it's utterly irrelevant.
Let's not forget what and how America was suposedly started as a place of relgious freedom by the pilgrams (according to so called american history books) these
religious people proceeded to rob & kill the Indians who saved their lives, take & kill Mexicans for land & gold & oil enslave a whole group of
people as property for financial gain all under the guise of being
good «Christians» (WHITE) and now perceive all «Muslims» (NON-WHITE) are evil unless proven otherwise.
This is a
good example of why
religious people are dangerous and why they were right to fire this quack.
As a God - fearing soul - filled
person, I see no reason to bargain with atheists or their idiotic vestiges of palpable dogma they spew forth by their desicrating
religious faiths of abundant measures Teach your children
well you parents of Atheistic dissention.
People who are
religious or spiritual are so because it feels
good not because it makes sense.
People should be able to go where they want to go: This is the highest
good to be upheld by civil and
religious authorities.
One
person said he would see but might
well choose to stay with his existing beliefs, but could not be defined as either
religious or atheist.
A
better strategy would be to point out how one doesn't need religion to be a moral
person, and then demonstrate how some of the
people that claim to be a beacon for
religious zealots (the GOP) practice an existence devoid of morality.
They are dangerous and not at all conducive to a society of
people working together for the
good of ALL regardless of
religious belief.
It is about religion... and your right, as soon as
religious people stop persecuting those that don't believe the world will be a
better place.
Jake, how can you think you are a million times
better than any
religious person on the planet?
Maybe you'll also learn a little history as
well... if anyone has been intolerant over the last few thousand years, it's the
religious people of the world.
G, if my words came out that way I apologize, I don't think that all
religious people are the same, like all groups of
people some are bu ttheads some aren't (that goes for the non believing community as
well).
Religious people may believe
people are «
better» with god, but as the statistics clearly demonstrate, that belief is as unsupportable as their belief in their imaginary gods.
Some athiests are just as bad as the fundimentalists... because they «know» I being and agnostic, however, take issue with anyone who says that
people who are not
religious do not think... in fact, it has been found that statistically, athiests and agnostics know the bible
better than christians.
So, if you have actually read a bible and have a
better argument for me than «I want proof» (because there is none, it's a
religious BELIEF) or that Christians judge
people or hate
people (because as a TRUE Christian you must not judge & you must love thy neighbor) then I'm all for it!
Yes, awful things have been done by «
religious»
people, and in the name of religion, but a great deal of
good, too.
Well it is true that some
people seek sorcerers to implement Jinn that are satanic demons into mankind or his house or his business to finish him or make his life miserable or to stop flow of his business income... In such case it is either you are
religious enough and say your prayers often then it becomes hard for this to harm you or otherwise you need to find some one who practice exorcism to remove this evil... But many are just pretending to be
good at it and help you not but squeeze money out of you with tales and stories... There is another type of possessions and that is not through a sorcerer but directly by coincidence what man is at his weakest moments and those weakest moments for a possessions are when you come through a great fear or when cry or laugh loudly in hysteria, or during a certain moment of mating... or even when sneezing loudly... That's why there are prayers to be said on daily basis to guard you from such things and specially if passing haunted places such as deserted houses but most evil ones are residents of public toilets and market places... Some of them even would claim that you have made a wrong action by which you have killed a dear one to them and for that they have possessed you and that is mostly night time such as throwing a cigaret butt to a dark place or stepping killing an insect or even an animal at night which could have been one of them or possessed by one of them... So this is true thing happening to many who suffer unexplainable illnesses or sufferings which could look like mental illness that comes and goes as pleased...
If the righteous «
religious» folks spend half as much time worry about their own lives and morals instead of butting into other
people's, we'd all be
better off.
are not just exhibited by
people of «
religious beliefs,» but by others as
well.
It's called deconstruction and the GOP is leading the way because, as this nation knows all too
well, the
religious right of America hates to pay a fair living wage to workers, they prefer to enslave
people to serve them.
The interpretation of the no
religious test clause propounded by
good people like Bill Bennett and William McGurn would put it at odds with at least two clauses of the First Amendment.
(The only change is our ability to understand it even
better) I consider myself a deeply
religious person who fully participates in the organization and work of my faith.
So many
religious well intended
people want to impress God and religion upon others with various beliefs and arguments that include you will, «burn in hell if you don't» or other not so harsh or threatening consequences.
we are animals... some
people are stupid and pray to imaginary beings... there is no natural code of conduct requiring us to think you are somehow
better than just another moron... you want respect, EARN it... one way to do that is to keep your
religious beliefs to yourself instead of inflicting that crap on everyone around you...
That was
best, most candid article I've read from a
religious person.
Are they jealous of the hope
religious people have in something
better?
I do not see any of the
religious folks with much in the way of
good things to say about gay
people.
The problem is that the
religious powers in places like Saudi Arabia and the United States are
well aware of the power of being the providors of welfare (charity) and fight tooth and nail to monopolize that right and to keep
people dependent on their own services.
I have a
better idea, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and Benjamin Franklin were not
religious people (Deists, believers in a distant God).
I'm not the most
religious person in the world but I appreciate the
good work that many churches do.
Yes, my life is a million times
better than any
religious person.
What upset the
religious leaders so much about Peter's speech on Pentecost was how the
good news was for all
people everywhere.
Well I sometimes use the Christian label so as not to be oppressed by
people like you — for example, when filling out
religious preferences for organizations like the Boy Scouts.
How about all lbg
people and especially athiests just stop eating anywhere that has a history or management that is from a
religious faith that means almost no grocery stores no restaurants 98 % of the world believes in a religion the other 2 % can just not interact with the rest of us if thats what they want no skin off our backs make the world a
better place just become reclusive your already hateful, distrustful and judgmental