Sentences with phrase «good rules because»

«Raise your hand before you speak» is also not a good rule because it can not always be enforced.

Not exact matches

I wrote a separate article on the topic of delegation where the simple rule is that if someone can do a job 70 % as good as you can, you should delegate it because you get 70 % of the output using almost none of your time.

In my observation, California drivers are among the best in the world, perhaps because the state has so many freeway shootings, which provide incentive to follow the rules.

As a rule of thumb, mobile app clicks almost never provide good quality leads because most people accidentally click the ads or are not in the right frame of mind to take commercial offers seriously.

In Mexico City, negotiators finished work on regulatory best practices and transparency guidelines, and also reached agreement on rules for the chemicals industry, according to people familiar with the talks, who asked not to be identified because negotiations are private.

But the best hockey — and the best business — happens when competitors fight hard within the rules of the game, winning because of their superior talent, not because they busted the other guy's knees.

Joel Reidenberg, a privacy expert with Fordham University, told me, «The relevant EU rules are based on general fair information practice standards, addressing a variety of aspects related to fairness in collection, purpose limitations, transparency of processing, accuracy, data subject access, and remedies for violations, and are more stringent because of their detail as well as some new twists.»

The 2 - Minute Rule works for big goals as well as small goals because of the inertia of life.

I love the 2 - Minute Rule because it embraces the idea that all sorts of good things happen once you get started.

It is just such a good smartphone for such a good price that I'm not going to rule it out because of that.

In fact, in December 2017 a Virginia district court judge ruled against a female plaintiff in a lawsuit alleging sex discrimination, sexual harassment, and retaliation against defense contractor BAE Systems, in part, because she «did not take advantage of BAE's harassment reporting procedures of which she was well aware.»

Because CHX's preferred member is not the firm that appears to be better at this trade, it seeks to modify its rules in order to tilt the playing field in its preferred member's direction.»

This rule has worked well for us because it not only helps us stay on budget, but it also make sure that neither one of us strays from our long - term goals.

Now they are not good capital for current British stress tests, but the court ruled that that wasn't enough, because «they may still be taken into account in future stress tests.»

Finally, because the Impartial Conduct Standards will become applicable on June 9, 2017, the Department believes that firms will make efforts to adhere to those standards, motivated both by their applicability and by the prospect of their likely continuation, as well as by the impending applicability of complementary consumer protections and / or enforcement mechanisms beginning on January 1, 2018, depending on the results of the Department's review of the Fiduciary Rule pursuant to the President's Memorandum.

Nix: Well, let's wait till the election's over because we never talk about elections that live, generally, as a rule of thumb.

Instead, firms have noted that because the DOL modified the final rule in order to ease compliance concerns (for example, the final rule allows for the sale of proprietary products while satisfying the best interest contract exemption), they will instead seek to fulfill the exemption's requirements, so can continue to support advisors with commission - based compensation arrangements.

The final DOL regulation «unfairly targets certain types of fixed annuity products, making it harder for Americans to purchase fixed indexed annuities when it is in their best interest to do so,» he said, adding that «this legal challenge is necessary because the rule creates an unworkable standard for independent agents and insurance companies and goes far beyond DOL's authority.»

From next month, holding onto personal data without a very good reason to do so will be far more risky — because GDPR is also backed up with a regime of supersized fines that are intended to make privacy rules much harder to ignore.

Simply walking away from small, or micro plan clients in order to avoid that risk once the rule is implemented is not a good option for broker - dealers, added Smith, because the risk of losing the associated high net - worth sponsors as retail clients is too great.

Even a 401 (k) rollover into an IRA — which would require exemption from the fiduciary rule using a Best Interest Contract Exemption (BICE) because it's expected to cost more than the 401 (k) plan — can improve the quality of a client's investments if the client couldn't access that asset in his or her 401 (k) plan, said Joe Taiber, managing partner at Taiber, Kosmala & Associates.

you make you rules and self obey to it not because of fear but because you think this is right, and the best setup... you are you master!

Having a comprehensive investment plan is the best way to control your reactions because you will have rules to guide your actions depending on how the markets play out.

Prime Minister Najib Razak was the best thing going for the ruling coalition in Malaysia's last elections, but he's a hindrance this time because of financial scandals and government policies blamed for a rising cost of living.

We, on the other hand, view it with hope: because more than anything, the events of the past few days show that the truth is getting out — the truth that capital markets simply can not exist under the authoritarian rule of central planners, the truth that the stock market is a casino in which the best one can hope for a quick flip, and finally the truth that our entire socio - economic regime, whose existence has been predicated by borrowing from the uncreated wealth of the future, and where accumulated debt could be wiped out at the flip of a switch if things go wrong in the process obliterating the welfare of billions (of less than 1 % ers), is one big lie.

«This puzzles people because they expect things to follow what mathematicians call the transitive rule: if A is better than B, and B is better than C, then A is better than C. For example, if you replace the phrase «better than» by any of the phrases longer than, heavier than, older than, more than, or larger than, then the rule is true.

The situation is not as clear for some other countries, but as a general rule, we are probably better off in current circumstances than most suppliers because of the weight of commodities, foodstuffs and «inputs into exports» in our mix.

Ezrati rules this out, not on the basis of any sort of calculation, but simply because it doesn't seem «reasonable» (and certainly not fair) that the market should perform worse in a good economy than in a bad one.

«In some sense, it might even support employees better because the locking - in rules with some pension legislation are a little restrictive.»

They only provide accounting data b / c that is all the SEC requires — AND because accounting rules provide loopholes that enable companies to manipulate earnings, a well - known fact that has gone unaddressed for some time despite some empty saber - rattling.

They only provide accounting data b / c that is all the SEC requires - AND because accounting rules provide loopholes that enable companies to manipulate earnings, a well - known fact that has gone unaddressed for some time despite some empty saber - rattling.

It's a good idea to keep those records on hand for seven years because customs services in various countries can challenge you on rules of origin at any time.

This is because of its transparency and well developed online privacy rules.

Although there is no hard and fast rule for what type of equipment is best suited to a lease vs. a purchase, there are some types of equipment that could make more sense for a lease because of the shorter usable life of the equipment:

Although disliking Jews go further back, such as their exile, one of the reasons is that the Pope made a rule that Christians can't loan money (but accepting a loan is ok) so Jews end up taking the job and so long as things are going well, people probably like jews because they received money (though they probably didn't like paying them back with interest).

FML... anything good I might've done is now invalid because of that damn Nazi rule!

Again, religious groups are well advised, as a general rule, to avoid political partisanship — but not because the Constitution prohibits their active engagement in public debate, nor because they might get in trouble with the IRS.

This rule was not set in place just because someone thought it would be a good idea, but rather because it's necessary to keep in mind the things that are best for our country.

It's interesting to see how people will find their own truth, dig in their heals and be blind to any other idea... What would Jesus do is an interesting question... I consider my self a Christian and a spiritualist... because I believe it's just not as black and white as one religion or another thinks... there is way more grey area... but a fundamental truths that are a good rule to live life by, wether you are christian or not... treat others the way you want to be treated... do unto others... I am my brothers keeper... all apply.

The two are based on the belief of «Jesus» and a single god then two religions start to divide in their little rules for being a «good little Catholic» vs a «good little Christian», people have died because of this, example the Crusades.

Well, it's because no religious value, rule, law, tenet, or bit of dogma EVER trumps this nation's laws and we all agree on that, otherwise you might as well make the sleazy pope President and let the Ayatollah Khomeni be Vice President and we will live under religious sharia law with death for anyone who speaks blasphemy or who «dishonors» any religious figure whether real or Well, it's because no religious value, rule, law, tenet, or bit of dogma EVER trumps this nation's laws and we all agree on that, otherwise you might as well make the sleazy pope President and let the Ayatollah Khomeni be Vice President and we will live under religious sharia law with death for anyone who speaks blasphemy or who «dishonors» any religious figure whether real or well make the sleazy pope President and let the Ayatollah Khomeni be Vice President and we will live under religious sharia law with death for anyone who speaks blasphemy or who «dishonors» any religious figure whether real or not.

Not only that, but because the «rule of law» is itself part of the common good — i.e., it is one of those «conditions» that is conducive to human flourishing — it is part of lawmakers» vocation, and something they are obligated to do, to make law in accord with the rules - laid - down.»

Well Right now I'm reading As.sholes Finish First by Tucker Max, just finished «I hope they serve beer in hel.l», right before then I read all the Game of Thrones books (I guess we'll have to cut out book one according to your rules because season 1 is book one), I'm also in the midst of reading the god delusion by Dawkins.

Just because something is in a story that's told in the Bible, it does not make it a rule, good example or something worth emulating.

Just like in the times of Christ just because the majority may have rule or power and can out - shout us or be the only ones heard doesn't neccessarily mean they are right or good or capable of demanding we all live and think and believe as they all do.

There are some basic rules of thumb that societies live by across the world (don't kill, don't steal, ect...) because a society in anarachy doesn't work, or rather, it doesn't work as well as a civil lawful society.

so what is God gonna do... choose one people... well he did and now the rules have changed and according to Christians... God's chosen are all going to hell because they refuse to accept Christ.

Civic responsibility belongs to all the people because the people as a whole are the best custodians of the right, the safest guardians against the perversion of justice by the powerful few who would rule over others for their own advantage.

The saints fear God, not their opponents, because God's good and gentle rule outbids all that opposes the gospel.

Is it possible and after reading about it i kept on thinking «i will sell to my soul for 20 carats get out shut up i will never ever sell my soul to you oh god please help me and this is continuing for a few days i am afraid that i have sold my sold to the devil have i please help and still i think god's way of allowing others to hate him us much worse even you know and can easily think think about much better punishments like rebirth after being punished for all the sins in life and i am feeling put on the sin of those who committed the unforgiviable sin (the early 0th century priests) imagine them burning in hell fire till now for 2000 years hopelessly screaming to god for help i can't belive the mercy of god are they forgiven even though commiting this sin keans going to hell for entinity thank you and congralutions i think the 7 year tribulation periodvis over in 18th century the great commect shooting and in 19th century the sun became dark for a day and moon was not visible on the earth but now satun has the domination over me those who don't belive in jesus crist i used to belive in him but now after knowing a lot in science it is getting harharder to belive in him even though i know that he exsists and i only belived in him not that he died for me in the cross and also not for eternal life and i still sin as much as i used to before but only a little reduced and i didn't accept satan as my master but what can i do because those who knowingly sin a lot and don't belive in jesus christ has to accept satan as their master because he only teaches us that even though he is evil he gives us complete freedom but thr followers of jesus and god only have freedom because they can sin only with in a limit and no more but recive their reward after their life in heaven but the followers of satun have to go to hell butbi don't want to go to hell and be ruled by the cruel tryant but still why didn't god destroy satun long way before and i think it was also Adam and eve's fault also they could have blamed satan and could have also get their punishment reduced but they didn't and today we are seeing the result