Not exact matches
I'm grateful to the many researchers,
scientists, and educators who took considerable time and great care to help me
better understand their
work and the
work of others
in their
field, including David Yeager, Cybele Raver, Pamela Cantor, Sheila Walker, Philip Fisher, Mary Dozier, Clancy Blair, Jack Shonkoff, Camille Farrington, Kirabo Jackson, Ron Berger, Dacia Toll, and Jens Ludwig.
The money is
good — «
better than a starting professor, but not as
good as a heavy - weight
scientist in the
field» — and, even more important, the
work is satisfying: «I enjoy the short - term challenges we face when I am assembling the new instruments, as there are often new and different applications by many of the customers.
The goal was to find out just how replicable social
scientists think the
work in their
field is, and whether it is
better — or worse — than it was 10 years ago.
''... the Action Plan places great emphasis on
better catch reporting, more investment
in data collection and analysis, and extensive observer programs to support the efforts of
scientists working in this
field.»
There are a number of
good research institutions and universities here, and a sprinkling of biotech companies, but you might find very few
scientists actually
working in your particular
field, and those who exist might not encounter one another very often.
It elicits the
best ideas and
best work from highly motivated
scientists because it chooses the grantees through a competitive system of merit rankings done by peer committees composed of academic experts
in each
field who serve as part - time judges.
Doing a master's degree first is a
good idea, he suggests, because it gives would - be Ph.D.
scientists the opportunity to
better inform themselves about
fields in which they might want to specialize for their doctoral
work.
I am a PhD student
in sustainability, which is a
field that really believes there is a need for more trans - disciplinary
work (
in this case perhaps science and art) as
well as a need for
scientists to engage and connect with people outside their
field, especially general audiences and decision - makers.
But to really harness power from the bioinformatics tsunami, researchers will need to be experts
in aspects of both biological and computer science, and therein lies a fundamental problem: Relatively few
scientists in either camp are sufficiently
well versed
in the other's line of
work to fully exploit the
field.
Scientists working in this
field use their expertise to «give [companies] the power to put [their]
best data forward,» according to a slogan Aviv quotes.
«The ultimate goal is to identify the weed species, the areas of the
field they appear and
in what densities so precision herbicide applications can be made or a herbicide program developed that
better suits what is
in the
field,» said Dr. Vijay Singh, AgriLife Research assistant research
scientist working with Bagavathiannan
in College Station.
With hard
work and full support from the Editorial Board and the editorial office, I believe the journal will attract submissions from
scientists as
well as clinicians
in the
field of cellular and molecular medicine research.
The researchers say the processes identified
in the cave will help them to
better understand what is happening
in sunken ecosystems around the globe, including parts of the ocean that are currently being stripped of oxygen — a major concern to marine
scientists working in the
field.
Nancy Rabalais, a marine
scientist who has spent much of her career probing environmental risks to the coasts and waters of the Gulf of Mexico, sent me some cautionary thoughts on cleanup options based on decades of
work, including
field studies following the 1979 blowout of the Ixtoc I oil
well in the western Gulf.
A third is that
scientists in highly specialized
fields would do
well to reach out for added statistical expertise when trying to test broader implications of their
work.
Curry says the private sector is a
better place for
scientists to
work rather than the «politicized
field» at universities and
in government.
If those things can induce climate
scientists to manufacture a false consensus, the same effect can
work just as
well in any other scientific
field.
The
scientists I have
worked with were some of the World's
best in their
fields.
Even
in those
fields that have the most individual
scientists that don't believe
in AGW, they are still a minority that can not stop their representative bodies from honoring people like Dr. Hansen for their
good work.
Well, when it comes to detailed analyses of complex topics,
scientists who
work in the same
field may disagree about the
best analysis method, the
best model, maybe even the
best datasets.
Freeman Dyson is not a climate
scientist and, to the
best of my knowledge, has never
worked in any climate - related
field.
QUALIFICATION PROFILE Innovative Research
Scientist in Cancer, Immunology, Cardiovascular and other therapeutic
fields, highly skilled
in in vivo and
good experience
in Cell Biology, independently
work on many scientific projects.