Sentences with phrase «good side of people»

This propaganda stirs emotions and seems to bring out the not - so - good side of people at times.

sometimes working in the retail world, you don't always see the good side of people: so this holiday season, i urge you all to be kind to all employees as we are all trying our best.

The passion for people comes naturally and from an early point in my childhood where my grandmother always shoed me the good side of people.

Not exact matches

It actually moves people over to the side of, «Oh, we're in a better place than we thought.»»

«Now that we know which traits to look for, we can begin to make progress on how to best assess them in high - stakes settings such as hiring and promotion, where people are more inclined to hide the darker sides of their character,» she told The Huffington Post.

Aeryon, an 80 - person firm that has staked its business on serving the exacting needs of professionals with products that sell for up to $ 200,000, could end up being side - swiped by producers of the type of flying toy you bought at Best Buy for your kids for Christmas.

Good content is created for people first, search engines second, so to get the best content, showcase the human side of your business.

According to McGonigal, the appeal of SuperBetter (which is played by 125,000 people worldwide) is that unlike many medications that treat such conditions, it has no side effects — and people always want to see what works better than current protocols.

The sometimes hidden side of all this focus advice is that actually implementing it means saying no to lots and lots of well - intentioned people.

When you can find people to fill jobs in Colorado, they will be part of one of the best workforces in the nation — smart and savvy, but on the expensive side.

You can meet face to face and connect with your workers right then and there, and you have a better grasp on the «people» side of your business.

And when it doesn't matter if it fails it has a better chance to succeed because you're just trying to be useful to other people, and money is a side effect of that.

If both sides, through their eyes and their people's eyes, have concluded that the plaintiff is absolutely going to win this case, and the plaintiff is going to get a lot of money because they're totally on board with everything that has been presented, then that might be a good reason for the defendant to agree to a settlement with the plaintiff for less money than the potential exposure if the jury comes back and finds willful infringement.

«The other side of the coin,» added Vasileff, «is the minutiae - driven people,» who obsess over issues and tasks that don't really contribute to their emotional or financial well - being.

We also found people falling off the other side of the emotional balance beam as well, becoming overly rigid, scripted and automated in their conduct — and, as a result, failing to deliver the message with compassion.

I assume that the individuals on both the ETH and ETC sides of the hard fork are good, well - meaning people, and there is ample evidence to support my view.

[16:00] Pain + reflection = progress [16:30] Creating a meritocracy to draw the best out of everybody [18:30] How to raise your probability of being right [18:50] Why we are conditioned to need to be right [19:30] The neuroscience factor [19:50] The habitual and environmental factor [20:20] How to get to the other side [21:20] Great collective decision - making [21:50] The 5 things you need to be successful [21:55] Create audacious goals [22:15] Why you need problems [22:25] Diagnose the problems to determine the root causes [22:50] Determine the design for what you will do about the root causes [23:00] Decide to work with people who are strong where you are weak [23:15] Push through to results [23:20] The loop of success [24:15] Ray's new instinctual approach to failure [24:40] Tony's ritual after every event [25:30] The review that changed Ray's outlook on leadership [27:30] Creating new policies based on fairness and truth [28:00] What people are missing about Ray's culture [29:30] Creating meaningful work and meaningful relationships [30:15] The importance of radical honesty [30:50] Thoughtful disagreement [32:10] Why it was the relationships that changed Ray's life [33:10] Ray's biggest weakness and how he overcame it [34:30] The jungle metaphor [36:00] The dot collector — deciding what to listen to [40:15] The wanting of meritocratic decision - making [41:40] How to see bubbles and busts [42:40] Productivity [43:00] Where we are in the cycle [43:40] What the Fed will do [44:05] We are late in the long - term debt cycle [44:30] Long - term debt is going to be squeezing us [45:00] We have 2 economies [45:30] This year is very similar to 1937 [46:10] The top tenth of the top 1 % of wealth = bottom 90 % combined [46:25] How this creates populism [47:00] The economy for the bottom 60 % isn't growing [48:20] If you look at averages, the country is in a bind [49:10] What are the overarching principles that bind us together?

The best accidental side effect of running a website and writing articles for Seeking Alpha is that it occasionally allows me to stumble into friends I haven't to in a while — the kind of people that you enjoyed being around, but then life happens, and for whatever reasons, things happen and you fall out of touch.

Those are all good things, but the side effect of low interest rates is you're causing people to borrow more money and spend it.

Early this week I was with an Australian government representative in Beijing whom I have known for many years and he told me that iron ore prices were currently around $ 83 (I think they dropped another $ 2 last week), and that while some people in Canberra were reluctant to say it too loudly, he and others were increasingly in agreement with my lower forecast of less than $ 50 well before the end of the decade, in part because supply has come off much more slowly than predicted, but mainly because they now recognize that China's rebalancing was indeed going to be a far bigger deal for Chinese demand than sell - side research had predicted.

It's a QED of denial: We are a progressive community of good people on the side of good, therefore that isn't happening.

The flip side of compound interest is a nightmare: fees added to decision - making, and fees that aren't in your best interest, but [instead] for the people giving the advice.»

Seems like a good use of «other people's money» if you go along with the leverage side of it.

There are a good number of people working in the corporate sector who are effectively running side businesses along with their jobs.

On the influencer side, the insights that you get with linking and tagging brands in Stories shows you how many people clicked on the link so you have a better idea of how much of an impact you're generating for brands and if I'm linking to a blog post (another way I drive traffic to my blog) then I can see how many people clicked on the link from my stories.

He taught generations of managers the importance of picking the best people, of focusing on opportunities and not problems, of getting on the same side of the desk as your customer, of the need to understand your competitive advantages, and to continue to refine them.

But I am okay, and if people believe that is going to be all good once they are Christians, what they will probably find is that life will get hard and seem impossible regardless, but somehow in the mix, after we are spit out the other side of the tough stuff, we notice He is still there, and in «that» there is hope.

Even on abortion, that most contentious issue, the pro-choice side generally holds to an idea of the good the pro-life people will recognize, while condemning the method by which it is to be achieved.

Wisdom in the good and dark side of people.

People of good will argue on both sides.

I consider that men DID create and write the bible, but both Christ and satan are metaphors... christ is the metaphor for the potential good in a person, satan the metaphor for the potential of bad or evil... given that this is MY definition, and makes much more sense that most other beleifs, then the bible WAS written by satan, or rather it was inspired by the bad / evil side of the minds of the writers.

Some might see glaring faults from a guy named «Attack of the 50 Foot Magic Underwear» who seems to think he has the facts on his side, when in reality he is just as small - minded and un-educated as the people he professes to be better than.

As a recovering christian, 5 years clean and open minded, the truth definitely did set me free - it set me free of the horrors and fear that come with christianity; it allowed me to look at things from all sides (putting the shoe on the other foot so to speak); it allowed me to love more freely and be a better person.

In the graciousness of the book (something often lacking when people engage Emergent, no names but...), in its passionate for the Scriptures, in its understanding that true faith shows itself in love, in its acceptance of the many things postmodernism has going for it without capitulating to todays culture, and especially in the willingness to both take on and unite both sides, Wittmer has written something here to be commended for, and something that all believers no matter what side they lean toward would do well to read.

Some people think of God as «the force» from Star Wars, with both a good side and a dark side.

We have rushed into violence because the current of society runs that way, because, good - hearted people that we are, we side with the oppressed.

It might seem strange the people can simultaneously hold both ideas mentioned above; namely, that the poor man represents Jesus Christ on earth, and therefore all the right is on his side, and he is the only one who must be considered; but at the same time, that poverty is a scandal, and we must do our best to get rid of this scandal and to put the poor into a «normal» situation; that is, put an end to poverty.

In today's divided moral landscape, with thoughtful, well - meaning people on both sides of every issue, there's no better way to show that you're a serious thinker than by acknowledging that every controversial issue is «complex.»

He seems to find little problem with finding the good side of killing enormous numbers of people, and will again, at the Second Coming, correct?

But the theological error that underlies this idealization of violence leads them into a new, a sociopolitical Manicheanism which (like the earlier, metaphysical Manicheanism) is also an idealism, a simplifying resource to help people participate in a complicated world where, they know, they had better do what the powers that be recommend and take sides.

Its just plan stupid and a waste of time, if you believe in god or buddah or allah or anyother good thats great for you and if you do not believe in a god thats great too, Whats one big problem that i cant understand is why people are so narrow minded on both sides of the specturm and even within different religions.

King thus confronted the most critical task any leader faces when seeking to promote racial harmony: assuring the «good people» on each side of the racial divide that their counterparts on the other side do, in fact, exist.

Whether you agree or disagree with the evangelicals» conclusions or the validility of their premises (I am sure that there are people who either completely agree or vehemently disagree with your underlying premise), it would be better if all parties would recognize that rationality and morality are not wholly owned by one side or the other.

I know very well that there are dark sides to every city — I experienced the dark side to Cambridge when I as running a hostel there, but that doesn't deny the fact that the majority of people in a city are not evil.

Meanwhile the opposing side is made of largely a lot of seemingly logical «smart» often well educated people who are ironically no where nearly as «smart» as people out there generally think or realize so it literally becomes a debate of ignorant verses stupid on both sides which I do as a footnote occasionally find mildly entertaining.

The larger problem at play here is people largely as a whole are for lack of a better word, stupid, and I'm not talking about either evolutionists or creationist - what I actually mean is both sides!

It is well known the Obama's are not very «spiritual» people as niether one of them grwe up in that kind of environment according to the many many books written about them on both sides.

1) most people haven't given serious thought to these issues and are just giving their «feeling»... it would not be hard for person with well - thought out positions (on either side of the issue) to expose the lack of logic in their position and get them to change their mind... most people just reflect their culture.

She didn't mean any harm, but when we don't know what another person has been through, it's best to err on the side of caution rather than assuming the person just left, deserted the ship, or whatever else people might think.

if you can lie to yourself with immunity, you might be an atheist if you think the indifferent support your side, you might be an atheist if you don't think at all, you might be an atheist if you are drawn to religious discussions thinking someone wants to hear your opinion, you might be an atheist if you copy paste every piece of crap theory you find, you might be an atheist if you think you are right no matter what the evidence shows, you might be an atheist if you can't hold your water when you think about science, you might be an atheist if you can't write the word God, with proper capitalization, you might be an atheist if you think your view has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you think The View has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you live in a tar paper shack, writing manifestos, you might be an atheist if you think you're basically a good person, and your own final authority you might be an atheist if you think your great aunt Tillie was a simian, you might be an atheist if you own an autographed copy of Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an atheisof crap theory you find, you might be an atheist if you think you are right no matter what the evidence shows, you might be an atheist if you can't hold your water when you think about science, you might be an atheist if you can't write the word God, with proper capitalization, you might be an atheist if you think your view has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you think The View has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you live in a tar paper shack, writing manifestos, you might be an atheist if you think you're basically a good person, and your own final authority you might be an atheist if you think your great aunt Tillie was a simian, you might be an atheist if you own an autographed copy of Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an atheisof the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you think The View has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you live in a tar paper shack, writing manifestos, you might be an atheist if you think you're basically a good person, and your own final authority you might be an atheist if you think your great aunt Tillie was a simian, you might be an atheist if you own an autographed copy of Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an atheisof the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you live in a tar paper shack, writing manifestos, you might be an atheist if you think you're basically a good person, and your own final authority you might be an atheist if you think your great aunt Tillie was a simian, you might be an atheist if you own an autographed copy of Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an atheisof Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an atheisOf The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an atheisof definition, you might be an atheist.