Well they have
a good tactical manager, and are currently 10th in the Premier League.
better tactical manager and has shown this with never losing to wenger.
I would like
a better tactical manager than Wenger but I do not believe Gazidis will hire that type, he will hire a yes man who can make profit like Wenger has done, he will want to show his boss that he is doing a good job even though he is an incompetent fool, worse than Wenger.
I do nt doubt Wenger loves Arsenal and I will not say he is
the best tactical manager we could have, I do wonder though how much he is using his contract as a bargaining tool?
Not exact matches
Yes I think someway we are lucky, as for Chelsea I think they know what Chelsea
good at parking the bus and I did know why they praise that a ** Chelsea
manager cos he is not always park the bus, from the goal different, you can see that and that a ** really know how to
tactical play to win games.
We have a
good team with some great players but a
manager who does not use their skills to
best advantage, a new
manager with
tactical nous, problem solved!
From a
tactical point of view, both gaffers did their
best to outfox the other subtly but our
manager won.
The
manager basically stumbled upon that piece of
tactical gold, and adopted and adapted it
well (credit to him).
IMO, Spanish players are so so intelligent and so are most of their coaches They are highly technical and
tactical so for me Arteta will be a very
good manager.
Bruce had been disappointed by Ben Arfa's lack of work rate in recent Tigers games, as
well as his inability to stick to his
manager's
tactical instructions, leading to the former Marseille star being hooked off early in successive games and given a half time dressing down during the defeat at Old Trafford.
Bring in
good players, I am in support but the MANAGERIAL ACUMEN of the
manager with
TACTICAL TRAINING / FLEXIBILITY depending on opponents to meet determines the success of any team at the end of the season.
The contractual amateurism displayed by our management team, the planting of seeds in the press to negatively sway fan opinion regarding our
best players, the glaring lack of
tactical nuance displayed by our
manager, the continued failure to address the most obvious of deficiencies and the utterly disrespectful way this
manager has treated the fan - base, especially when it came to the child - like manner in which he handled his own contractual situation, are but a few of the legitimate reasons for his immediate dismissal.
Waiting for the lame excuses, we have external problems, there first goal was a push, we started the game slowly, we responded
well after going 2 nil down, we can't compete with city's money, wish he would just say say sorry but I have built a team of pushovers with no
tactical input from me, I can't keep up with these new
managers and there ideas and I have been winging for a decade cus the board don't have the balls to sack me.
Of course there are other factors, players who are simply not
good enough, zero
tactical nous displayed by the
manager and a thin squad but for the purpose of this article I will look at the formation.
All that is just as
well really, because the search for a new
manager, which seems ever more necessary after the loss to Liverpool and Wenger's
tactical «gamble» of dropping our
best player, may be complicated by the fact that the current La Liga champions Barcelona are also looking for a new head coach.
We have a
good squad with glaring gaps and a
manager with the
tactical nous of George Bush in a nursery on 9/11.
Spending power is not going to bring you results by itself.You need a
manager who is a
tactical genius and a
manager who reads / know the opponent
well enough and bring the
best out of his players.
No, they have
better desire,
better tactical awareness and overall a
better manager.
Mourinho isn't a
tactical genius otherwise he'd win every season — he is a guy who has the
best possible facilitation for his squad and if he was that great of a
manager then this would translate to victory every year.
Hope and pray the Board appoints a younger innovative
tactical manager who also coaches and brings out the
best in the players, ready to kick their backside when under performing, clears out the deadwoods and signs quality players to address the deficiency in the team, more proactive on the touchline and ready to go toe to toe against Pep Klopp Mo etc..
That
tactical switch has since gone down in history as one of the
best decisions ever made by a
manager, because three goals in six second - half minutes turned the tie around, before a 1 - 1 draw in Belgium sealed Paisely's first major trophy as Reds boss — he went on to win three European Cups, three League Cups and saw Liverpool crowned champions of England six times.
Still playing
better without him???? N u guys still will come out n blame somebody else r blame the
manager for stupid
tactical r else n bla bla bla bla.....
we need a
better, younger, hungrier,
tactical savy
manager... If by a miracle wenger wins the champions league = He can never win a double..
Aside from the usual
tactical / systematic naivety he displays by playing players out of position (when
better options are available) and generally over packing the midfield with like minded players, This transfer window has thrown up the same baffling questions for me in relation to our
manager and his actions (or is that in - action?).
At the same time I think a more
tactical manager could get the
best out of Ozil and have a solid looking set up.
Wenger is a great asset to Arsenal, but as a
manager with his flaws, it may be
better to move him into an other position at the club and get someone who knows how to prevent injuries wenger could but did nt — or with the
tactical variety to prevent losses like at anfield and stamford bridge, or making the change of tactic when we just cant score against teams like leicester.
A decent
manager with some
tactical nous would have him playing
well.
I'm not sure if Koeman can motivate our players as
well as he did to Southampton, but what is apparent is that pretty much any PL
manager right now has
better tactical knowledge than Wenger.
Wenger is not a
good manager (proven games after games)... No
tactical sense, no passion, no understanding of the game and so on... Just useless!
We still have many gaps in our squad that we all know very
well, with a big
tactical gap in our
manager's head, we need deseperately a FIRST CHOICE dmf, FIRST CHOICE STRIKER, AND A FIRAT CHOICE CENTER BACK alongside koscielny, Wenger has always kept it very late in the window until when we the fans become satisfied with any addition at the last minute
I'll say, after 22 years in charge... the
best tactical change we could make is to change
Manager.
Wenger is far from that
tactical wizard and he has failed out GKs for year after year after year... If everything else was
good other than GK then it would be a shame to sack a
manager for 1 fault.
The
tactical side of football is always developing and changing to some extent and Arsene Wenger has himself earned a
well deserved reputation for the way that Arsenal have played the game since he took over as our
manager almost 20 years ago.
If we can get some of the
better coaches in then we can look at a
manager that is more of a
tactical genius instead of a great coach.
Once upon a time he was the
best manager in the world with a great
tactical mind.
But they have a
manager that knows how to motivate and get the
best out of the players, that he has, A
manager that studies his opponents before hand and makes the right
tactical adjustments to compete and even beat them at their own game!
I hope so too, But it won't be easy since Bradley is a decent
tactical minded
Manager, no doubts that he will be doing his homework during the international break and how many times have we seen teams play better for a new m
Manager, no doubts that he will be doing his homework during the international break and how many times have we seen teams play
better for a new
managermanager?
The only positive to be had from changing the
manager would be (we'd hope)
better tactical and player position decisions and an injection of enthusiasm.
For me, the
manager can be reduced in this change down to a
tactical manager with
good political skills.
It is a
good thing & minutes has to be the first thing for him thought it would've been
good to be mentor by a
manager with
tactical acumen to the role Wilshere wants to grow into and how it can benefit Arsenal.He needs to play and regardless of what happens while on loan Arsenal will know where they stand with him.
Yesterday's session which lasted a little above 15 minutes was more of technical and
tactical instructions by the
manager, who is using his vast experience of Africa football to
good effect.
so don't try to accuse me of wanting new faces, if the
manager improves hi
tactical awareness and buy the right type of players am sure we will do
better but no he does the same thing every year we compete for a while then when it matters we flop then he says Quote» WE ARE CLOSE» a load of bull show me how close you are by your point.
Yesterday against Plymouth Argyle, the Us showed a control and poise for the first 45 minutes that denotes a
manager in possession of
good decision - making abilities and a
tactical coherence that should take Oxford far in this division.
It's
good that the
manager sees it from a
tactical viewpoint and we work on the training pitch before the game on our tactics so we don't get caught up in the occasion.
Your laid back attitude proves your passion is not that of many others, if you can not see from that display a team lacking in
tactical skills, desire and respect for there
manager you would be
better off in the world of chess, bowls and tiddlywinks.
With an increased emphasis being placed by many investment advisors on so - called «
tactical»
managers, as
well as other «alpha - generating» trades, it's not surprising, though somewhat disappointing, that simple beta often gets ignored.
The story focuses on
Good Harbor Financial, an ETF portfolio
manager known for its high - performing
tactical investing strategies.
Most of the material in these courses begins with the false premise that indexing results in mediocre performance and then explains in effusive detail how portfolio
managers can do
better by making
tactical moves, clever trades, shorting stocks, using derivatives and a host of other exotic techniques, many of which have long fallen out of use.
Commentators often point out how Jose doesn't rest players as often as many other
managers do, but it's not often talked about how he manages to keep his
best men fresh: he uses finely - tuned
tactical systems to keep the distance each man has to cover on the pitch to the bare minimum.
Served as a
tactical project
manager in a SDLC environment (from requirements gathering through design, build / integration, testing, and deployment) for the Business Enablement team where the primary focus was on internal IT projects including infrastructure, environment migrations, internal integrations, as
well as application development integrations.