Sentences with phrase «good tactical play»

It's actually really good tactical play — it releases our attackers to be creative and flexible, while le coq holds everything together.

Not exact matches

Yes I think someway we are lucky, as for Chelsea I think they know what Chelsea good at parking the bus and I did know why they praise that a ** Chelsea manager cos he is not always park the bus, from the goal different, you can see that and that a ** really know how to tactical play to win games.

Mr wenger it is not a must for your favorite unfit tired players to play the match Mr wenger there is something called a tactical change and that is when you replace players or change tactics early when things ai nt working right, welbeck chamberlain where poor for the duration the played alexis was also poor Pls switch debuchy and Chambers the both played well bt were not effective, deubuchy with his pace and energy would have ran the right channel better Lastly mr wenger have faith in your players and play them you signed them

-- consistent injury issue — no signings (when we need them and there are better players out there than we have in our team / squad)-- no strength in depth (kids, or not sufficient quality bought)-- no consistency in performance (motivation)-- tactical nativity and inflexibility — players played out of position or too Many like minded players accommodated in same line up.

the same is true about your statement.we all know most of the top teams bar juventus play either4 -3-3 or 4 -2-3-1, which are very similar.We know that Wenger isn't a tactical wizard and hes very cautious, so why would he change formation?the only reason i can see would be to accommodate players who might not get into the team i.e Ramsey on the wing.Which is not a good idea

I get your point mate.But in truth Ramsey is the CM and Xhaka is the DM according to our formation anf tactic.It's even debatable if Xhaka is capable of playing DM.I think Ramsey's tactical awareness is poor but he has every right to take risks and move into the opposition box.He's a box to box player.The only problem is Ramsey overdoes it.If we had a proper CDM the team would be more balanced.Now it's like we have two CM's playing in midfield and due to their poor tactical awareness we're always left exposed.I conclude by reminding people that Wilshere is better footballer and is more intelligent than Xhaka.It'll be better playing Wilshere and pairing him with a CDM than having Xhaka play there.He just gets to play over him becausr we signed him for # 35.

Instead of moving players out of position to accommodate a new arrival how about applying some tactical nous and allowing two talented players to both play as strikers.The best teams of 1998 - 2004 had a number of different strikers playing off the genius of Dennis Bergkamp.We had pace, movement and power.Although I would not put Ozil in Bergkamps class he is talented enough to pull the strings with other playmakers such as Jack and Mikki in the side in a 442.

1) On the pitch: - we always start 3 -4-3 but always switch back to a back 4... it isn't tactical as we look bad in both - Bellerin playibg LWB when you have the best in the bundesliga last season on the bench - Welbeck playing the striker role when he can do everything but score when you have Lacazette a record signing on the - Monreal in back 3 when you have Kostafi who can flank Per in the middle protecting him against pace as well as having a commending figure and - Telling Xhaka to not play as a 3rd offensive player when Ramsey dashes - Playing a guy in Ox so out of position and persisting with him over preseason as if he would be there for years when it is clear he doesn't want to play for us (his case is a weiplaying the striker role when he can do everything but score when you have Lacazette a record signing on the - Monreal in back 3 when you have Kostafi who can flank Per in the middle protecting him against pace as well as having a commending figure and - Telling Xhaka to not play as a 3rd offensive player when Ramsey dashes - Playing a guy in Ox so out of position and persisting with him over preseason as if he would be there for years when it is clear he doesn't want to play for us (his case is a weiPlaying a guy in Ox so out of position and persisting with him over preseason as if he would be there for years when it is clear he doesn't want to play for us (his case is a weird one)

Bale has played very well in so many matches but once the tide is that you are not helping or something is wrong and then it is reinforced with tactical choices by the coach Gareth does not stand a chance.

So in my honest opinion we actually lack the tactical awareness and grit to dig in, to realise you can't always win playing well.

he lacks the tactical nouse as well as the fire to inspire this team to play out of their skins to grind out a win no matter what the situation is.

We look way better with Jack in the middle rather than Ramsey, because Jack can pull off Wenger's tactical possession play much better.

- quality signings when required - tactical awareness - good substitutions and adapted formations to sooth opponents - better player / injury management - players playing based on form not just favouritism

He has no tactical ability, no plan B, no understanding of the purpose of substitutions, no understanding of how to adjust play to better defeat the opposition on the day.

Still playing better without him???? N u guys still will come out n blame somebody else r blame the manager for stupid tactical r else n bla bla bla bla.....

Aside from the usual tactical / systematic naivety he displays by playing players out of position (when better options are available) and generally over packing the midfield with like minded players, This transfer window has thrown up the same baffling questions for me in relation to our manager and his actions (or is that in - action?).

Yes, that edge largely returned in the second half, following some tactical adjustments and what was certainly a blistering halftime «talk» from Simeone, and Atlético played better for it.

When a 16 years old from WH plays better than anyone from out full of stars team, at half time some major pep talk and tactical surgery should have been done.

We're going to waste time and money on a CB when we should be looking for a top class DM.If Wenger think signing another CB is solving our problems then he's lying to himself.Mark my words any other CB we sign no matter how good will still come and add to a shaky defense.The problem with our defenfing is more of tactical and mental.Tactical because we play without a DM, we mark and track players poorly, the fullbacks are usually isolated leaving them to cope alone, our passing is not good enough leaving us exposed to counters which we aren't prepared for and no leadership and maintenance of defensive shape.

A decent manager with some tactical nous would have him playing well.

When you consider — 15mil for Gabriel, 10mil for Monreal and 19mil for Cazorla I honestly feel there's been a change in focus on transfers, both due to the prices as well as the tactical and technical similarities to the way we play.

Man City on their own part, are on a little revival of sorts; they have started playing well and started winning games, so beating them will take lots of tactical effort and determination.

He fast, skillful and a good finisher, so he can complement Giroud by sharing the burden upfront, offer a different tactical approach by playing as the cf by himself, gives Giroud rest and competition up front.

As well as pointing out that he is the sort of defender that plays on the front foot with aggression like our own Laurent Koscielny, it says that he has a very good tactical understanding and reading of the game.

Playing a speedy & fluid front 3, dropping Giroud and Theo, moving Alexis to the right... now there is the ruthless Arsene Wenger for you at his tactical best.

The tactical side of things might work for him as well as the Gunners will expect to be as dominant and as far forward on the pitch, but then again perhaps the pace of Welbeck could swing things in his favour and he did play well on Friday.

I don't think his job is to initiate attack, he's main job is to win the ball back and play a simple pass to our more offensive players, and he is not bad in possession as d stat and u re suggest, and I don't see any tactical reason behind carzola being backward order than ramsey being injured, nobody initiate our attack better than ramsey and dats d work of a box to box midfielder and not the defensive midfielder.

Couple that with Wenger's own under - management of players and tactical laziness / disrespect to opposition, and you have yesterday at Anfield, the 6 - 0 at Chelsea, the 5 - 1 at Anfield a few years ago, the 6 - 3 at Man City, the destruction TWICE by Bayern (who claimed we were easy to play against), the weak - willed defeats against anyone well organised like Watford or West Brom, etc..

Wenger's tactical play has always been poor even in his best times however then we had better, harder players so it was not as obvious.

Anything is better than playing players out of position, having no tactical understanding of the game and the complete and total inability to motivate anyone.

I won't be fooled into thinking we have a better squad than Chelsea so first thing I'd analyze are the tactical limitations of the formations Chelsea play which are typically the 4 2 3 1 and the 4 3 3 especially with the injuries we have in mind.

Ramsey has had one good season for us since his horrible injury, he needlessly gives the ball away much too often and his finishing is even worse than Giroud's... once again we have fallen in love with the idea of what could have been... Ramsey has only scored 2 meaningful goals in his entire Arsenal tenure: one in Turkey and the other in last year's FA Cup, which is not near enough to make him a centerpiece of this offence... likewise simply his presence on the team sheet has led Wenger into making horrible tactical blunders because he will force Ramsey into the lineup even when it doesn't make sense... just think of all those games when Ramsey was played out wide on the right, which forced the RB to come up into the play far more often, and deeper, because Ramsey invariably would find himself in a more central position leaving us far more vulnerable to the counterattack..

We not only play for our current tactical blunders but historical transfer mistakes as well.

yeah & Martinez claimed his players were tired in the 2nd half amazing we have played 3 time in the last 9 days while everton had a weeks rest & many call him a tactical genius we should have won that game if the first goals wasn't allowed (foul + offside) & had giroud taken his chances well he had 3 good chances

The tactical side of football is always developing and changing to some extent and Arsene Wenger has himself earned a well deserved reputation for the way that Arsenal have played the game since he took over as our manager almost 20 years ago.

Given his style of play, position on the field and overall tactical qualities, it was always expected that he would make a good coach, and while he still has plenty to prove on that front, Balague can see an emotional return to Liverpool down the line having established himself as a hero at Anfield.

This is your doing Wenger, you old stubborn a22hole The tactical deficiencies of Arsenal are a joke, forget about horrible transfer windows, not playing the right players in the right spots, not bringing in subs fast enough to change the game, not seeing that Cazorla was not able to defend the Liverpool onslaught in the first half and at least switching him with Ramsey who can run and defend with the best of them.

I hope so too, But it won't be easy since Bradley is a decent tactical minded Manager, no doubts that he will be doing his homework during the international break and how many times have we seen teams play better for a new manager?

Back up must not be interpreted as an unused sub, but as a well - used tactical asset played in certain games or when Ozil fades.

Ramsey will be needed when facing park the bus teams as his kamikaze runs will destroy any tactical defensive setup while wilshere will be suited when playing a more fluid play against good football playing teams or kamikaze does not work.

It is a good thing & minutes has to be the first thing for him thought it would've been good to be mentor by a manager with tactical acumen to the role Wilshere wants to grow into and how it can benefit Arsenal.He needs to play and regardless of what happens while on loan Arsenal will know where they stand with him.

Also of note is the finding that the best performing young footballers who will go on to play the sport professionally display superior dribbling skills, endurance capacity and tactical awareness compared to their peers, from as early as 14 years of age.9 17 These differences appear well before it is possible to accumulate 10 000 h of practice, but allow predictions of which players will go on to achieve best performances in adulthood, suggesting that the effectiveness of and response to training, rather than simply training, determines success.

«We also need to make some tactical changes but there's no guarantee that our play will become much better.»

They cite what they consider to be some strange team selections, players not playing in their best positions, an apparent favouritism for «undroppable players» (Noble being the main one here), poor preparation for games, a lack of organisation and tactical awareness, and players not seeming to understand (or able to carry out?)

There were a couple of tactical changes made as well, with Rooney now playing in a withdrawn role behind Welbeck and Ashley Young took over the set piece duties from Nani.

Chelsea have a well - oiled formation and tactical setup that will allow them to control the game from the back and look to play balls in between the lines into the likes of Hazard and Morata.

Liverpool played in the same tactical vein though as they did against Bournemouth, with a particular emphasis on attacking out wide, rather than down the middle — as they do in games where the attack is stagnated: a disproportionate (this is good) 39pc of Liverpool's attacks came on the right - side, with 33pc centrally, and 29pc on the left.

When complimented on his tactical choices, the Italian coach responded, «I look to put the players on the pitch that were much better rested from Coppa Italia since we ended up playing for 120 minutes.

Both players appear to thrive in different tactical systems — the Armenian looks at his best when charged with adding the precision to the sleek, efficient counter-attacks of Borussia Dortmund from the right flank — while the Swede played the role of attacking spearhead for a Paris Saint - Germain side that seeks to dominate possession of the ball, and therefore their opponents.

If Spain's long - term success stems from playing a predictable style and doing it better than anybody else, Germany's comes from being the masters of tactical flexibility.