Sentences with phrase «good thing for science»

Upon gaining his Ph.D. in 1996 — and with it three awards — Saïb realized that the best thing for his science and his career was to stay where he was.

Not exact matches

For one thing, «There are a lot of good drugs on the market for heart disease right now that come in generic form,» says Neil Lesser, a principal at Deloitte who specializes in the life sciences, in an interview with FortuFor one thing, «There are a lot of good drugs on the market for heart disease right now that come in generic form,» says Neil Lesser, a principal at Deloitte who specializes in the life sciences, in an interview with Fortufor heart disease right now that come in generic form,» says Neil Lesser, a principal at Deloitte who specializes in the life sciences, in an interview with Fortune.

He argues that the European landmass, without barriers for protection, was locked into constant warfare the forced organized populations to be well armed in offensive and defensive capabilities and sciences that would constantly make improvements in things like medicine (to increase population) and food technologies (to feed the masses) and so forth.

«Man, if we could get more really smart MIT computer science graduates to try and fix education and health - care and poverty instead of building another photo - sharing app, that would be a good thing for the world.»

In fact, science has a few things to say about the factors undermining employee well - being, and a few ideas on what you can do to change your workspace for the better.

Sometimes these things get in the way of our real understanding of the universe, but over the long term, science is the best method for finding truth.

It's a good thing for him that his religious leader kept the post as head of medicine at his hospital or he might not have access to such relevant and accurate medical science...

The point is you speak of things as FACT and then something changes by 14 BILLION YEARS in a distance of 347 miles from the Earth observation to Orbit, and you just say OH well that's science for ya.

The internet is the best new thing, (for we atheists, who can now talk science and reason without fear of murder by the faithful) Those who are still clinging to faith and delusion NEED HELP.

Yes scientists are an arrogant bunch aren't they, let's get rid of this science thing, what good has it actually done for us?

Science and God can coexist... for those who choose to believe I can't begin to argue with you about the existence of God because you have closed your mind to Him... I won't argue why God allows bad things to happen... because you don't even want to see the good things...

7Whitehead's position could be defended on other grounds as well: e.g., it gives us a single type of experience for all existing things; it provides a single metaphysical basis for the natural and social sciences; it stresses the difference between the becoming of a not - yet - existing occasion and the relations between existing things.

But people in science have the sense and methods to stay sensible about leaving behind things that are later proven false (or for which better theories come along).

A man in industrial research summarized the pressure he felt thus: «It's made clear very soon that neither science nor a good product is the goal; making bucks for the company is the big thing.»

Science is powerful BECAUSE you get to go back and rewrite all of the books once you find evidence for a theory that better - explains things than previous theories do.

Vague impressions of something indefinable have no place in the rationalistic system, which on its positive side is surely a splendid intellectual tendency, for not only are all our philosophies fruits of it, but physical science (amongst other good things) is its result.

Now I think that in making this distinction Whitehead makes a good and original initial point; because it is the fact that philosophers, by instinct, always think heterogeneously about nature, whereas scientists, equally by instinct, don't, which, more than any one thing, makes the philosophy of science so unreal a subject for actual research scientists.

Amen.The thing is too many people from both sides try to disprove the other, Scientist (well some) will say there is no God Ala Hawkings here and then some believers will say that evolution or anything pertaining to science that they don't understand is false.I don't believe that science and God are mutually exclusive.For me personally science helps to explain a lot of things regarding creation, almost like giving me a window into how creative God is.I believe that God uses science to show us how awesome he is.To me science does not disprove Gods existence it actually reaffirms it on a human logic level, for me.You may disagree, that's fine, but this is just how I see it.

As exlonghorn says, only humans have made things better for other humans through development of science, technology, better laws and better societies.

But science around the immune system, allergies, and food tolerance tells us that exposure can do good things for your baby — and it might actually protect against allergies.

I'm feeling pretty positive about the whole «secondary education'thing - there are some very good text - books around, and I realise that these days most science experiments have to be done by a teacher, for safety concerns, so we can probably do almost everything at home - or else find something on TV or the Internet.

For example, instead of saying «Nice work,» it's better to say something like, «You worked hard on your science project; you really earned that A.» However, avoid the reverse: don't say things like, «If you worked harder, you would do better.»

Well, for starters, I can see lots of reasons why anybody who believes there is such a thing as a «white race» would at least be considered to be out of touch with medical science.

Doug Muzzio, professor of political science at Baruch College, said he believes Cuomo is doing the best thing he can for himself by remaining mum on the scandals that have left Albany more dysfunctional than ever.

«The diamonds have delivered these well - preserved materials to us at the surface,» says study co-author Steven Shirey, a geochemist at the Carnegie Institution for Science in Washington, D.C. «They're a classic example of how the tiniest bits of material can tell us big things about our planet.»

Martin: One other thing that struck me: Marchers like to claim credit for all of the good things science has brought — from beer and antibiotics to air travel, but never any of the bad stuff.

Lanza says that this time, he aims to do things right: direct good science focused on treating disease, publish in reputable journals with rigorous peer - review processes and work with high - quality collaborators and clinical centres for its trials.

R. G.: Marching through the town to celebrate the best things you've got (pride for your sexuality and pride for your job in science)-- it's very rewarding.

At the same time, the RSC preference for defense spending might bode well for the defense science and technology enterprise, which among other things is a major funder of university research.

A brand new science for studying this networked phenomenon, and in effect it's kind of a reverse engineering the World Wide Web that we know and the kinds of networks that we see on that to try to figure out how they took shape and maybe from that we can learn what principles involve and how networks do grow and you might be able to use that sort of thing to be able to develop a better system s for example being able to create more efficient networks and that could be very valuable in industry, there may be a lot of practical applications, involving protecting privacy, for example, and stopping people from stealing identities; and you should, you know, should be of just an interesting phenomenon.

The puritanical reverence some people have for science may be a good thing, but it can sometimes lead to bad career choices.

At least in principle, «[i] n many situations [submitting a Registered Report] should only be a good thing for junior researchers because it alleviates the pressure to get «good results,»» writes Sam Schwarzkopf, a neuroscientist at University College London in the United Kingdom, in an email to Science Careers.

But these days, of course, people are increasingly turning to the Web first for sort of fast - breaking news about science and technology — and there are wonderful things about the Web because, of course, it's a highly interactive media and it is one where it's a really very well suited for letting people explore their interests in whatever level of depth that they have, which is perfect for something like Scientific American.

For one thing, textbooks may be good for science learniFor one thing, textbooks may be good for science learnifor science learning.

One of the things I find very disturbing about the current approach to drugs, which is simply prohibition without necessarily any full understanding of harms, is that we lose sight of the fact that these drugs may well give us insights into areas of science that need to be explored and may give us new opportunities for treatment.

A career in data science typically requires at least a master's degree, and so far there aren't enough qualified workers to go around; that's a very good thing for people seeking science - related careers.

«We hope that we can still change things, for the good of biomedical research and for the benefit of patients,» says Nathalie Kayadjanian, senior scientific officer for the medical scientific committee of Science Europe, a group of science funders and research organizScience Europe, a group of science funders and research organizscience funders and research organizations.

«The truly odd thing is that the laws of physics, which surely ought to be responsible for what we see in the world, can work just as well both forwards and backwards in time,» says Dean Rickles, a philosopher of science at the University of Sydney in New South Wales, Australia.

When more is invested in science — a good thing — the ranks of graduate students and postdocs swell to meet the demand for temporary labor.

And the one thing we shouldn't be abandoning for the future of the country are investments in what this country has done so well and what it returns so much to the country — namely, science and technology.

«Members of Congress are good at talking about things they aren't experts in, except for science.

But I would like to say that if what we are trying to do in science journalism online is get a fresh start and genuinely be better than what we've been doing in the past, then the most important thing is to actually try to fix what has bugged me for years and years as one of the biggest failings of traditional science journalism; which is that 95 percent or more of what passes as science news is driven by what I refer to as the big paper of the week model.

That's a good thing, says Mark Keim, associate director for science in the Office of Environmental Health Emergencies at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), it can both improve disaster response and allow affected populations to take control of their situation as well as feel empowered.

DiChristina: Yeah, I mean I think one of the things we don't realize working on the insides of Scientific American all the time is that the editor is not just working with the scientists but also they're reporting and going out to meetings and doing other things; they're [scouring] the world for the best science that matters for readers, have a lot of expertise themselves and it just seemed to me that this would be the kind of thing that readers might really find fascinating — what the editors of Scientific American [are] thinking based on all their conversations with the experts of the day covering the various areas of science and technology and how it affects our lives; and this was the genesis of this story.

«Peter is a guy with a good sense of what science is worth doing, so I think he'll be working at the hands - on level to direct things,» says William Brinkman, a theorist who worked at Bell Labs for many years and served as director of the Office of Science from 2009 tscience is worth doing, so I think he'll be working at the hands - on level to direct things,» says William Brinkman, a theorist who worked at Bell Labs for many years and served as director of the Office of Science from 2009 tScience from 2009 to 2013.

He said it was a really great idea to profile science in a big sports event, to give something different to the public, for the entire world to see how well science can do and what great things we can expect in the future.

For me, the method of science is a profoundly spiritual discipline, because it's saying that I will give up telling myself things that will make me feel better in exchange for knowing a little bit about the univerFor me, the method of science is a profoundly spiritual discipline, because it's saying that I will give up telling myself things that will make me feel better in exchange for knowing a little bit about the univerfor knowing a little bit about the universe.

«While photosynthesis is extremely good at oxidizing water, the truth is many man - made processes of doing these things are not that good,» said Thomas Jaramillo, a researcher at the SUNCAT Center for Interface Science and Catalysis in Stanford University's Department of Chemical Engineering.

Well, one of the fun things about [an] item such as that insurance one, or others, is in each case, we've zeroed [in] on some unique moment of insight for that origin story that we're telling and tried to connect it with a larger picture of science.

So, it's very important for politicians to understand the importance of science and technology, not because it's a good thing to talk about, but especially in an age of today where we are in a globalized economy, where competition is — I tell my students, if you can not work hard, by the time they will graduate, the jobs will be taken away — you have to constantly work hard and think creatively and engage yourselves in a way, in a globalized economy.