Sentences with phrase «good value for money on»

That alone offers pretty good value for money on a cost - per - hour basis.

14) Best Value for Money on a Date — Date Three — The Burlesque Dancer — The tickets to watch Scarlet Vixens perform at the Reading Fringe Festival were only # 5 and saved the night!

Hotel Laguna is the best value for money on Hastings Street.

Our GO PRO MAX PACKAGE is the best value for money on the market.

Refurbished in May 2002, Hotel Laguna is the best value for money on Hastings Street.

If you can get over those two caveats then this console offers the best value for money on the market at the moment.

Not exact matches

Perceived advantage is built on factors like greater prestige, more convenience, superior effectiveness or better value for the money.

If you don't try to negotiate for a higher salary, you could be leaving money on the table — so during your next interview (or annual review), try some of these tricks to increase your perceived value as well as your take - home pay:

The Puck Money Fan Value Index rates the franchises for cost and on - ice performance to determine which team offers the best fan experience.

The online bank strongly separates itself from the competition on the basis of both an excellent online experience and good value for money, due to its low fees and high returns.

A wave of challengers such as online banks have focused on delivering solid value for money in addition to good customer service.

The deal also follows increased pressure on fund management companies from Britain's Financial Conduct Authority to provide better value for money for investors.

I don't consider myself frugal, I just make sure I get value for money on what I want, I don't buy crap and get the best deal I can on fixed expenses.

Stocks of companies that have good free cash flow are another option to consider if you don't mind doing the research on individual stocks.2 When a company's free cash flow — the money available after a company makes payments to sustain its business — is increasing, it can be a good sign for the company's future value and its stock's future value.

The exchange with the best value for your money will depend on the currencies you're trading, your planned trade volume, how frequently you'll be making withdrawals and the coin prices themselves.

a set of values, beliefs, and structure in a person's life in order to give them direction and a sense of right and wrong is fine, but organized religions are no more than large corporations, and like any large corporation are only focused on their bottom line... trying to control the public and extract as much money as they can from them by any means necessary... promoting fear, uncertainty, hate and a sense that they alone can offer salvation... for a price (although they are very cleaver about getting to this hidden and unspoken cost... after all these hundreds of years they have perfected their craft well!)

Perhaps every conservative intellectual should be required to write two op - eds on the failure of the conservative intellectuals, and return one biweekly paycheck to their employers, to acknowledge that they've failed to give good value for money.

While the best Bundt pans made by Nordicware, may not be on the cheap size, in terms of value for money, when used they deliver every single time.

Especially with the special offers that are always on, it's easily the best value for money, the flavours are amazing and the nutrition is on point too.

UK supermarket Tesco says it has seen sales of its premium, organic and fair - trade products return to growth this year, as special offers on top notch goods convince shoppers that they are good value for money.

Manufacturers must now focus on providing cheaper products and designing their packaging to convey the attribute of good value for money, which has become the primary concern for young consumers who are unemployed.

Currently, there is a polarization trend going on in the chocolate market — on the one hand consumers want good value for little money and on the other hand, there is a trend towards best quality and innovation.

At the judging session, judges tasted and scored beers «blind» before seeing bottles or cans and marking them for on - shelf appeal as well as value for money.

Alexis came with a good spirit, seing Ozil on board, thinking a team would be built around them but year after year, it is no top class addition with a guessing game plan, weakness all over the pitch, players out of position, a team scared to play and lost as manager... Sanchez then started to ask more money, we said no as to Ozil; waiting 6 month later to be on last year contract... The all management is nuts and Alexis or any players try until they get fed up, Ozil plays to get fit for wrld cup and his value back...

Overall I would say Sanchez was just about good value for the money and wages we paid but OZIL was largely a waste of money, despite his undoubted huge talent, on the low percentage of occasions he could be arsed to show it.

Elneny at # 5m is far better value for money than Xhaka and Mustafi who cost around # 65m combined.Elneny along with Monreal was outstanding against West Brom whilst Xhaka and Mustafi were at best bang average.How on earth the ref did not award a penalty for the clear foul on JJR is beyond me.Unfortunately Mustafi was culpable yet again when he committed himself to a ball, landed on his backside and was bailed out by the watchful Monreal.

With reports that Arsenal are making progress on a # 50m deal to sign Paris Saint - Germain striker Edinson Cavani, CaughtOffside looks at five other possible targets upfront who'd make better signings, or at least better in terms of value for money than the expensive Uruguayan...

Arsenal are odds - on at 1/3 to win this game, which looks like a license to print money as far as I am concerned if you are a big time gambler, but being greedy I am going to look for a much better value bet and will probably increase my stakes by getting some bonuses from the best betting sites listed on bettingsiteoffers.co.uk.

Up front we have a few world - class players surrounded by some serious pretenders... Sanchez is by far the most accomplished player in our attack but the controversy surrounding his contractual mishandling could see him go before the window closes or most definitely by season's end... obviously a mistake by both parties involved, as Sanchez's exploits have never been more on display than in North London, but the club's irresponsible wage structure and lack of real intent have been the real undoing in this mess... Lacazette, who I think has some world - class skills as a front man, will only be as good as the players and system around him, which is troubling due to our current roster and Wenger's love of sideways passing... Walcott should have been sold years ago, enough said, and Welbeck should never have been brought in from the get - go... both of these players have suffered numerous injuries over their respective careers and neither are good enough to overcome such difficulties: not to mention, they both are below average first - touch players, which should be the baseline test for any player coming to a Wenger - led Arsenal team... Perez should have been played wide left or never purchased at all; what a huge waste of time and money, which is ridiculous considering our penny pinching ways and the fact that fans had been clamoring for a real striker for years... finally Giroud, the fact that he stills wears the jersey is a direct indictment of this club's failure to get things right... this isn't necessarily an attack on Giroud because I think he has some highly valued skills, but not for a team that has struggled to take their sideways soccer to the next level, as his presence slows their game even more, combined with our average, at best, finishing skills... far too often those in charge have either settled or chosen half - measures and ultimately it is us that suffer because no matter what happens Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke will always make more money whereas we will always be the ones paying for their mistakes... so every time someone suggests we should just shut - up and support the team just think of all the sacrifices you've made along the way and simply reply... f *** off

I just don't know what their about.Don't we know there's a risk associated with signing any player?To me Lacazette is value for money and I believe we are signing him at almost the right price.All we need is someone who can finish and Lacazette fits the bill.This is the kind of mentality that won't see us winning trophies anytime soon.He was my last option for CF but I won't deny the fact that he's a very good option.People are not able to justify the fact that he's average with facts.Yet the same people say Giroud is world class and so on.Shame on those people.They obviously don't know and understand what football is.

I wish fans would appreciate that Elneny at # 5m represents very good value for money.He was bought as a back up player unlike Xhaka and Mustafi who were so called stars costing # 70m who were going to take us to a higher level.If Arsenal were to sell Elneny they would at least double their money whereas we would take a huge hit on Xhaka and Mustafi.In fact I very much doubt it we would recoup 50 % of our outlay.Enemy will never be a great player but he is the type of dependable, hard working standby that every top team needs.Please get off his back.

at every home game please donate a pound or better throw it in Wengers direction he may get 50 to 60 k pounds every home match as they are already looting the fans there.sit on the money and wait for market value to come down wenger.players are there he just does not wan na pay.But we are a small club, wenger is actually proving the likes of fabregas, nasri and van persie that they were right to leave the club cuz all players have ambition to win the league

we can't even get rid of players that have barely mannered to us for several years... which is incredibly annoying considering that our beloved owner would never risk his own financial resources whether he brought in some new blood or offloaded several failed Wenger projects for less than market value... he would simply make a little less and the burden would fall squarely on other sources of income, primarily us... I don't know about you but I would gladly use all the money they have been stockpiling to rid ourselves of those that don't meet acceptable standards and to replace them with a few higher priced gems... I know, I know, Wenger and his minions have been scouring the globe for years now to find anyone that was as good as our current lot to no avail, but I've just got to believe there must be two or three guys somewhere out there that can play this crazy game

2nd you will loose on his much needed value if you let him off for free next season instead of making good use of this money to obtain a decent replacement someone like Mahrez or whom ever else would be a much better asset in that scenario plus Sanzhez being South American and all shall be very vocal about it and will throw tantrums and negative images through out the season for keeping him against his will and will simply will act childish which we all saw is very capable of and this would seriously affect team spirit for no good reason if you can actually avoid all that and offload him for a decent price now

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Whether or not that still makes him an appealing option remains to be seen, but on the face of it, for a top - class defender with plenty of experience and quality at a high level, that could still represent a very good deal in terms of value for money and so perhaps Chelsea could eye up a fresh bid next year.

Since all of our sharp money indicators point towards value on Alabama -9.5, it's important to shop for the best line.

However do agree with Stan on one thing, there are better ways to earn Mooney then football, Stan can now sell his shares and walk away with 1.5 billion or more GBP he can generate 10 % return on that money which is around 150 million GBP while his not earning anything now only the Value of the club is going up and i fear that what with the new prices and salaries of football players i can see a decline starting in a few years, so is he good for us in the future?

If you are siding towards them to come good in the face of adversity, then grab the big value odds of 3/1 on them to do it at Paddy Power, who are also running a Money Back Special for the round of sixteen at Brazil 2014.

For me, in the end I was able to get 250 shares in David Neres at # 1.07 a share and 50 in Pietro Pellegri at 48p a share on the basis that I think Neres will represent the better value for money over the next three yeaFor me, in the end I was able to get 250 shares in David Neres at # 1.07 a share and 50 in Pietro Pellegri at 48p a share on the basis that I think Neres will represent the better value for money over the next three yeafor money over the next three years.

We review the top baby video monitor products available on the market today from brand name manufacturers as well as products from less well known companies which sometime offer better value for money.

* Considering most people buy a pram then pay extra for the car seat, car seat adapters, carry cot, foot muff and so on, this is really good value for money.

PROS / CONS No smell or chemical odours Good size Adjustable Value for money Firm enough to sleep on, soft enough to hug Cover is not easy to remove and put back on

For further information, and to purchase your own copy visit Hue Animation — it is on special offer at # 49.95 at the moment, and I would say that represents good value for money when I consider the hours of use it has already hFor further information, and to purchase your own copy visit Hue Animation — it is on special offer at # 49.95 at the moment, and I would say that represents good value for money when I consider the hours of use it has already hfor money when I consider the hours of use it has already had!

Therefore it's quite important to get a good idea of what's on offer so that you can decide what the best baby crib soother is, with relation to the value you get for your money and how they suit your situation and your baby.

It's an all in one mobile toy where the main activity center can also detach and be played with on the floor as well making it a really flexible and therefore great value for money product.

One of the deciding factors that makes this probably the best value for money choice in tandem strollers is the price it sells for, at under $ 150 on retail sites like Amazon, the Graco DuoGlider Classic Connect represents a financially-wise choice, given the value you get for this price.

When you purchase a product that has the best value for the money spent on the product, this toddler bed has exactly what you need.

It's a great value for money choice for any parent, and an especially good choice for parents who are restricted on available space in their nurseries.

After seeing our guidelines on selecting a double stroller and checking out our top picks in different categories, you have all the information you need to make a great decision, that will not only serve your children's needs best, but will offer high value for your money.