Sentences with phrase «good value for the money because»

Looking at the results, Barry concludes that Company A may be better value for money because it has a lower P / E ratio.

She knows that contributing to her super is good value for money because she will earn a high interest rate on her savings and the government will put some money in too.

They represent very good value for the money because they keep you entertained while exercising your hamsters.

On the contrary, you can expect the best value for your money because you will be working with the experts right from the start.

Not exact matches

This idea revolutionized the world because it was fresh and very smart, if you own a stock below its intrinsic value and the company goes bankrupt, then you will get in return more than what you paid for, so, if the company goes bankrupt, you make money and if the company does well, then you keep making money.

1Ki 21:2 And after this Ahab said to Naboth, «Give me your vineyard, that I may have it for a vegetable garden, because it is near my house; and I will give you a better vineyard for it; or, if it seems good to you, I will give you its value in money.»

Figure 15: Approximately USD149, 771 million worth of CPG products were chosen by consumers in 2013 because they offered Better Value for Money

Figure 19: Approximately INR1, 150,962 million worth of CPG products were chosen by consumers in 2013 because they offered Better Value for Money

Because it operates in the hard - hit auto industry area, Redmer explains that it's even more important that their customers receive a good value for their money.

Figure 14: Approximately CNY635, 892 million worth of CPG products were chosen by consumers in 2013 because they offered Better Value for Money

Figure 11: Approximately EUR15, 400 million worth of CPG products were chosen by consumers in 2012 because they offered Better Value for Money

In the case of Aaron Ramsey, if Barca can give Arsenal a good money for value, Arsenal can sell him to them because both Arsenal and Barcelona have been partners in the transfer market for long.

Up front we have a few world - class players surrounded by some serious pretenders... Sanchez is by far the most accomplished player in our attack but the controversy surrounding his contractual mishandling could see him go before the window closes or most definitely by season's end... obviously a mistake by both parties involved, as Sanchez's exploits have never been more on display than in North London, but the club's irresponsible wage structure and lack of real intent have been the real undoing in this mess... Lacazette, who I think has some world - class skills as a front man, will only be as good as the players and system around him, which is troubling due to our current roster and Wenger's love of sideways passing... Walcott should have been sold years ago, enough said, and Welbeck should never have been brought in from the get - go... both of these players have suffered numerous injuries over their respective careers and neither are good enough to overcome such difficulties: not to mention, they both are below average first - touch players, which should be the baseline test for any player coming to a Wenger - led Arsenal team... Perez should have been played wide left or never purchased at all; what a huge waste of time and money, which is ridiculous considering our penny pinching ways and the fact that fans had been clamoring for a real striker for years... finally Giroud, the fact that he stills wears the jersey is a direct indictment of this club's failure to get things right... this isn't necessarily an attack on Giroud because I think he has some highly valued skills, but not for a team that has struggled to take their sideways soccer to the next level, as his presence slows their game even more, combined with our average, at best, finishing skills... far too often those in charge have either settled or chosen half - measures and ultimately it is us that suffer because no matter what happens Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke will always make more money whereas we will always be the ones paying for their mistakes... so every time someone suggests we should just shut - up and support the team just think of all the sacrifices you've made along the way and simply reply... f *** off

BTW I hope we get Mkthtaryan because for around # 25 million he is better value for money than Vardy or Morata

Seriously, I hope this deal works out because it could become the best value for money signing of the summer.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

I'd say, in such a scenario, buying a 60 - 70m player is probably better value for money, because even with the TV money, there will be less clubs able to buy at that value, hence inflation will not be as high.

It's currently also the best possible value for money choice, because you can get it at a 70 % discount.

Because value for money is an aspect that we always consider, our research has shown us that convertible cribs, that can turn into a toddler and full size bed, are the best choice.

A good soap ensures that you always get value for your money because you do not have to use a lot when washing.

Looking back now If I had to go back and choose again, I would probably go for Huggies Gold for both my children simply because I believe that it is better value for money.

The Joovy Zoom 360 made it onto our list of the best jogging strollers because it's a solid model that offers great value for money.

Value: Born shoes are a tremendous value for the money because they are extremely well made shoes that will last through many seaValue: Born shoes are a tremendous value for the money because they are extremely well made shoes that will last through many seavalue for the money because they are extremely well made shoes that will last through many seasons.

This is not negligible because it is better to have the value for your money last because you want to spend more money on other things your baby needs.

«We are looking at how the free nursery milk scheme can deliver better value for money, because we are very concerned about the escalating costs.

But Irwin Shapiro, an astrophysicist at the Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Mass., who chaired the 2010 Committee to Review Near - Earth - Object Surveys and Hazard Mitigation Strategies for the U.S. National Research Council, says that ground - based observatories such as the planned Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) on Cerro Pachón in Chile are better value for money than space telescopes, because they last longer and are less expensive.

The very best products give you the very best results, they represent outstanding value for money because you need less product to achieve the desired result.

Red grapes are a less concentrated source of resveratrol than the creams, but because they are only a fraction of the price you get far better value for money.

I did my best to include all the value for money choices because after all, who says that you can't have more than one?

While I can't argue with the Duster's value for money, I have a beef with Renault because it doesn't allow the budget SUV to be as good as it could.

The Kodiaq retains its crown as the best large family SUV, because it still offers the strongest combination of refinement, performance, practicality and value for money.

DIGITAL EDITOR ANDREW STOY: I've been hard on Acura lately over their wasted opportunities in the American market — nonsensical naming, good engineering let down by drab styling, etc. — but I really enjoyed this new RDX, helped in large part because it represents good value for the money, something that hasn't generally been true of Acura products in the past decade.

The Amazon Kindle looks set to launch later this year having gone missing since its US launch, but it could all be a little too late simply because the Nexus 7 is so much better value for money.

But because I'm such a stickler for giving you the best value for your money, I spoke with others in the business, too — top book publicists and industry insiders who know what works and what doesn't — to make sure what I've got in this priceless workbook is as good as it can be.

Many readers are turning to indies because our books are cheaper, and according to many, a better value for the money.

One reason that a bond can be significantly less than face value is because people are seeking better investments elsewhere, so for example if a bond doesn't mature for another 10 years, that 20 % increase in face value isn't very attractive when compared to say leaving your money in the stock market for 10 years.

You could also cash out the cash value and invest it in something more aggressive; whole life insurance is an inherently conservative play, and because you have a long period of time before you need money for retirement, it may make more sense to take the income tax hit now and better utilize that money in a more aggressive investment portfolio.

If you're a real estate investor, the cash value of your policy can be accessed for real estate investments and the return on investment can be exponential because you're making a return on the funds already in your policy... («it's your money») as well as the return on your real estate investment.

For a start, having debt on appreciating assets such as a mortgage on your home can be a good thing because the value of your house will be increasing at a rate that is far greater than the amount of money that you could save and quite possibly you would never be able to save the amount of money required to purchase a house in the first place.

Premiums are often much higher than a term life insurance policy with the same amount of coverage because you're paying for an insurance policy as well as putting money into the cash value portion of the policy.

By keeping the hefty margin away, unlike other big tour operators, they can offer great value for money travel experiences, all because they love what they do and want to provide their travelers with the best experience of South East Asia possible.

In addition to all that Budapest has to offer the city remains very good value for money for visitors, mostly because of its devalued currency, as Hungary is not using the EUR.

It's very good value for Money (Guess I got a special price because I stayed for 5 nights)..

I only stayed there one night but I would always come again because the Broadway hotel and hostel is situated in a nice area in Manhattan and offers a very good value for the money for NYC.

Because of its great location and value for money, the Seasons Harbour Plaza is popular favourite of travellers to Sydney who enjoy being in the thick of it over the festive season as well as the many corporate travellers seeking the convenience of apartment living while on their short term relocation to Sydney.

Like always the actual price of this product won't affect the score the end of this review too much, for two very distinct reasons: the first is that I get many of the games and products that I review on this site for free, and this I am not the best person to be judging value as I did not spend money on it, and second because I firmly believe that what I view as a good value for money may not be what you view as good value for money.

I've made my stance clear before in numerous reviews, but for the sake of clarity it bears repeating: pricing isn't something I factor into my final opinion of any game or product because what I personally view as good value for money may not be what somebody else views as good value.

These all seem like they would be vital to the growth of your city, but in reality they're worthless because they are incredibly expensive and other options are simply much better value for money while doing the same job but better.

The microphone ultimately leaves a hell of a lot to be desired, but frankly the rest of the package is superb value for money, although as always actual cost doesn't come into my final verdict because good value for money is a purely subjective concept.

Genuinely fully agree good value for money but Jim brings up some pretty good points because it's EA https://www.youtube.com/wat...