Sentences with phrase «good value for your money with»

It gives good value for your money with its high - quality features.

Yours Clothing is a one - stop shop for plus size shoppers and offers a good value for the money with its large and diverse selection of trendy separates, feminine prints and skater skirts, daytime and occasion dresses, and intimates and accessories.

You'll get the best value for money with our six month subscription offer which works out at just # 12.99 a month.

ROAD TEST EDITOR JONATHAN WONG: It's true that this 2014 Hyundai Accent SE offers good value for the money with all the aforementioned features Natalie lists above and a respectable drivetrain turning the front wheels.

Even as the base spec model, the LX comes well equipped with cruise control, and Bluetooth connectivity, but it's the EX model that offers the best value for money with features such as an 8 - speaker audio system.

Stayed multiple times now, perfect for the nightlife of Bristol and good value for money with good rooms and facilities as well as NCP parking just behind the hotel.

The hotel was good value for money with good food - clean rooms and pleasant helpful staff.

«The tour was a very good value for the money with no hidden charges and great shopping!

Good value for money with attentive service.

A slightly older hotel but very good value for money with very comfortable beds, super breakfasts and friendly staff.A pleasant situation — about fifteen minutes walk to town or seafront.

The Budget Room offers the best value for your money with all the necessary comfort and design for a pleasant stay.

For the price ($ 15 / # 12) it is good value for money with potentially thousands of hours of gameplay.

Both game also represent supremely good value for money with well - paced and hefty 12 - 15 hour campaigns that don't feel padded or slight.

# 13.99 provides very good value for money with the amount of fun and addictive gameplay.

Actual Crimes: Jack The Ripper costs # 3.49 / $ 3.99, it is good value for money with a fairly lengthy time to complete an investigation and the the random puzzle generation does give some replay value.

We believe there are 7 key ways to ensure greater transparency and better value for money with the purchase of legal costs.

The answer came in the form of the ZenFone line of budget, and mid-range devices like the ZenFone 5 from last year and now, the ZenFone 2 line of devices offer even better value for money with an option for 4 GB of RAM available.

Our extensive market experience offers you the best value for your money with outstanding quality delivered at affordable prices.

Not exact matches

The best time to ask for more money is when you're happy with your job and are demonstrating value to the company.

And with Juwai Data seeing a 70 % increase in Chinese buyer enquiries for Alberta1, it would seem that they've found their new investment destination in Canada — especially in Calgary, which offers better value for money when compared with the inflated housing prices in Vancouver.

Given the large amount of money that was made with well - run campaigns, the temptation to move over to the «dark side» brought a proliferation of copycat sites which presented almost no value for the consumer.

With a 4.4 star rating from more than 800 Amazon reviews, it's obvious that the Feather Popular offers good value for the money.

The exchange with the best value for your money will depend on the currencies you're trading, your planned trade volume, how frequently you'll be making withdrawals and the coin prices themselves.

Especially with the special offers that are always on, it's easily the best value for money, the flavours are amazing and the nutrition is on point too.

Vitamix blenders are built to last and come with full warranties to give you the best value for your money.

He said the «peanut butter approach» of spreading marketing investment into all of the company's brands was not working with Treasury Wine's getting better value for money by supporting its key premium brands and some bottom end commercial wines that are popular with consumers.

When faced with a wall of mueslis at the supermarket or health food store, you can end up feeling very overwhelmed trying to make sense of packaging claims and find the best value for money.

The sale, conducted via an open tender process over three days, received 51 bids with 16 of those bids considered best value for money for the Commonwealth.

The sale, conducted via an open tender process over three days, received 525 eligible bids, with 53 of those bids considered best value for money for the Commonwealth1.

Flavoursome and easy - drinking with appeal to palates the world over, Banrock Station wines are full flavoured, and value for money with varietal integrity, demonstrating respect for the good earth from which they have come.

Our bid to bring in a striker this summer has so far stuttered, and if Arsene Wenger can not find a better value - for - money option, maybe he could still end up raising his offer for Morata, with # 57 Million believed to be needed to tempt the Spanish giants into selling.

Alexis came with a good spirit, seing Ozil on board, thinking a team would be built around them but year after year, it is no top class addition with a guessing game plan, weakness all over the pitch, players out of position, a team scared to play and lost as manager... Sanchez then started to ask more money, we said no as to Ozil; waiting 6 month later to be on last year contract... The all management is nuts and Alexis or any players try until they get fed up, Ozil plays to get fit for wrld cup and his value back...

Still, the numbers weigh heavily in Chelsea's favour so far, with the Blues getting the best value for money in terms of money paid per goal contribution.

If fans will not boycott the games and stop paying for the tickets then let us at least unite and tell Silent Stan that the CEO is not making him the money that he could, if Silent Stan starts to see Gazidis as a loss to profit then maybe we can get an ambitious CEO in who will help us be ambitious and win titles, use that then to get better business done and add to the value of the clubs assets (players), remove the lowest value players (not good enough for AFC) and replace them with high value assets which will increase in value when we are winning / truly competing at the highest level.

To name a few additional struggles: we have to compete with the richest league in the world where every team has money and isn't begging for transfers of their best players to fund themselves (8/20 of the highest valued teams), we have a poor injury record that is being addressed, we have far fewer homegrown talents in our league, the overall league quality is higher even if the highest teams are not of the quality of other top teams, selling of our best players during the past decade has lead to a lack of momentum and yes, there has been times where our manager got it wrong.

Elneny at # 5m is far better value for money than Xhaka and Mustafi who cost around # 65m combined.Elneny along with Monreal was outstanding against West Brom whilst Xhaka and Mustafi were at best bang average.How on earth the ref did not award a penalty for the clear foul on JJR is beyond me.Unfortunately Mustafi was culpable yet again when he committed himself to a ball, landed on his backside and was bailed out by the watchful Monreal.

With that in mind, the decibel level was monitored at every game across the country, and recorded for fans to judge where the best value for money lay this weekend.

With reports that Arsenal are making progress on a # 50m deal to sign Paris Saint - Germain striker Edinson Cavani, CaughtOffside looks at five other possible targets upfront who'd make better signings, or at least better in terms of value for money than the expensive Uruguayan...

Up front we have a few world - class players surrounded by some serious pretenders... Sanchez is by far the most accomplished player in our attack but the controversy surrounding his contractual mishandling could see him go before the window closes or most definitely by season's end... obviously a mistake by both parties involved, as Sanchez's exploits have never been more on display than in North London, but the club's irresponsible wage structure and lack of real intent have been the real undoing in this mess... Lacazette, who I think has some world - class skills as a front man, will only be as good as the players and system around him, which is troubling due to our current roster and Wenger's love of sideways passing... Walcott should have been sold years ago, enough said, and Welbeck should never have been brought in from the get - go... both of these players have suffered numerous injuries over their respective careers and neither are good enough to overcome such difficulties: not to mention, they both are below average first - touch players, which should be the baseline test for any player coming to a Wenger - led Arsenal team... Perez should have been played wide left or never purchased at all; what a huge waste of time and money, which is ridiculous considering our penny pinching ways and the fact that fans had been clamoring for a real striker for years... finally Giroud, the fact that he stills wears the jersey is a direct indictment of this club's failure to get things right... this isn't necessarily an attack on Giroud because I think he has some highly valued skills, but not for a team that has struggled to take their sideways soccer to the next level, as his presence slows their game even more, combined with our average, at best, finishing skills... far too often those in charge have either settled or chosen half - measures and ultimately it is us that suffer because no matter what happens Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke will always make more money whereas we will always be the ones paying for their mistakes... so every time someone suggests we should just shut - up and support the team just think of all the sacrifices you've made along the way and simply reply... f *** off

Lacazette is one of our few options out there so I will be happy if this happens If I were Wenger I would also get Mahrez Lacazette and Mahrez would be # 70 - 80 million well spent and better value for money than # 80 mil for Higuain Both are 25 years old with time to get even better, Mahrez has PL experience.

I just don't know what their about.Don't we know there's a risk associated with signing any player?To me Lacazette is value for money and I believe we are signing him at almost the right price.All we need is someone who can finish and Lacazette fits the bill.This is the kind of mentality that won't see us winning trophies anytime soon.He was my last option for CF but I won't deny the fact that he's a very good option.People are not able to justify the fact that he's average with facts.Yet the same people say Giroud is world class and so on.Shame on those people.They obviously don't know and understand what football is.

we can't even get rid of players that have barely mannered to us for several years... which is incredibly annoying considering that our beloved owner would never risk his own financial resources whether he brought in some new blood or offloaded several failed Wenger projects for less than market value... he would simply make a little less and the burden would fall squarely on other sources of income, primarily us... I don't know about you but I would gladly use all the money they have been stockpiling to rid ourselves of those that don't meet acceptable standards and to replace them with a few higher priced gems... I know, I know, Wenger and his minions have been scouring the globe for years now to find anyone that was as good as our current lot to no avail, but I've just got to believe there must be two or three guys somewhere out there that can play this crazy game

SEE ALSO: Ten best goalscoring midfielders in Europe this season, with Arsenal & Chelsea stars chasing Messi & Ronaldo Five better value - for - money signings than Cristiano Ronaldo for Manchester United, including Bundesliga trio Manchester United transfer rumours

Can anyone say, with a straight face, that there is not a single player in that list who would have come to United, made them a much better team, and been fantastic value for money?

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Whether or not that still makes him an appealing option remains to be seen, but on the face of it, for a top - class defender with plenty of experience and quality at a high level, that could still represent a very good deal in terms of value for money and so perhaps Chelsea could eye up a fresh bid next year.

He is good value for money, additionally he allows players like Alexis to shine with his link up play.

While tracking steam is important, combining betting trends data, sharp money triggers (Steam Moves and Smart Money Plays) and shopping for the best line will maximize value while not leaving your bankroll exposed with too many wagers pending at money triggers (Steam Moves and Smart Money Plays) and shopping for the best line will maximize value while not leaving your bankroll exposed with too many wagers pending at Money Plays) and shopping for the best line will maximize value while not leaving your bankroll exposed with too many wagers pending at once.

However do agree with Stan on one thing, there are better ways to earn Mooney then football, Stan can now sell his shares and walk away with 1.5 billion or more GBP he can generate 10 % return on that money which is around 150 million GBP while his not earning anything now only the Value of the club is going up and i fear that what with the new prices and salaries of football players i can see a decline starting in a few years, so is he good for us in the future?

I'd say, in such a scenario, buying a 60 - 70m player is probably better value for money, because even with the TV money, there will be less clubs able to buy at that value, hence inflation will not be as high.