Sentences with phrase «good wingers»

Bacary Sagna — has been playing very poor recently, in arguably the worst form of his Arsenal career, and now coming up against good wingers, he will have to be on top of his game.

Inter, a team that has a couple of damn good wingers, didn't land one successful cross in the first half.

But he struggles against opponents with good wingers, who are able to switch play quickly.

we do nt need an «elite striker» because we have very good wingers who are capable of scoring 20 + goals (sanchez and walcott).

(i played both Nº 10, playing one and rest the other)... the thing is, we have a lot of wingers, and good wingers, 2 world class in alexis and theo, we cant afford to sit on the bench one of them... what about DM?

Now we have good wingers (Walcott, Sanchez), we have good midfielders (Cazorla, Ozil, Ramsey, Rosicky (fit), but we have been missing a CB, DM and a clinical world class striker that will get you 25 - 30 goals a season.

I really want Sanchez to stay but no player is bigger than our club hence we should let him go and try all we can to get two very good wingers at least and a center back.

Monreal is not a CB and will never be one.He's just a consistent performer who will be exposed against good teams and good wingers because he's not a CB.Per is slow and needs a player with decent pace around him.All this means our defence is weak.

France can use his strengths well because they have good wingers, but Arsenal have none currently.

So bad its shocking to say the least, move a box - to - box upfront and shift our best available am to the wing then bench 2 good wingers available, why?

«We have got a good defence, we have got good midfielders, we have got good wingers.

he could have received less critisicism and more plaudit, if he there was surrounded by good wingers and striker

OUR SITUATION IS WORSE NOW With Alexis we really needed a Top CF NOW, IT means we need 2 world class players OR 1 World class CF and two very good wingers

They also had good wingers which suffered a lot in the 3 -5-2 formation.

Arsenal already have top good wingers in the persons of: Sanchez, Walcott and Welbeck.

Alot may say wheres rambo but for me having 2 good wingers especially against teams who will sit back is essential in stretching the game and creating more space for our 2 maestros ozil n santi.

After Alexis Oxlade has always been our best winger in adding the defensive side to his game.

As for who's the better winger, it's close, but because of Alexis's all round capabilities, it goes to him.

im not to sure about sterling because im on the idea to take a striker first, like lacazette and play in the wing ox, welbeck, walcott, chuba or maybe campbell or wellington (probably i would sell the last one... al of u try him like a star when he is not younger than campbell and he did nt do anything, for me he is not on the standard)... BUT u cant said that walcott is the best winger in the league when he is fit.

He would basically replace Leroy Sane who is a good winger, can dribble but finishes poorly (can't count the number of times Sane has been played through on goal and failed to beat the keeper last season) Sanchez in that position and space will be lethal!

You are too much overlattin him brah, he is better ofcoz but nat e best winger in the world.

Ox and Theo better wingers than Ramsey and no transfer fee involved.

He won't track back which leaves Chambers exposed 1on1 with one of the best wingers in the world.

we are happy but the underlining problem still remains we need two good winger who can dribble on make pin point crosses Inside the Box against quality team we will struggle Wolcott lack technical qualityl an dribbling skills.

SEE ALSO: Best wingers in the world — Hazard & Bale in our top 20!

first he need to solve his injury problems to prove himself like a good player to take in the squad and not a wate of space, leave that «best winger» thing... finally, he even want to play as winger, so he never would be that best winger and probably we do nt need him because he cant play like a lone striker.

A good winger will be scoring once every 3 or 4 matches and assisting once every 2.

walcott is class and is one of the best wingers in the prem.

I will summarize what my view on the scenario is (1) There are no better winger / creator / striker available in the market.

We could use a good winger, AND, of course, someone who can take advantage of Ozil's assists better than Giroud / Welbeck / Walcott.

All I'm saying is for a squad which boasts of having three of the best wingers in the Premier League, there should really be more reliance on old - school wing - play.

Defence is where it could all go wrong as they have better CBs imo and we have the better wingers.

so a good LB will do as well as a CB, mertesacker is getting old and paulista is just far too inconsistent to command a starting beth on the team on a regular basis.so a good LB, CB and a good winger and i think we are good to go.

Wingers aren't really used in football that much wide forwards are more common I disagree with having the three best wingers in the prem.

Cazorla is a better winger as well.

If Giroud is completely entrenched in the CF role, or if we are to continue the style of play that we are in now, using that type of player through the middle, Walcott is the BEST winger we have.

When you think about it, Alexis is probably the very best winger that city could go for, and Bellerin is similar.

And then at the bench we have Campbell, don't you guys think Campbell / podolski would be a better winger or are you blind.

Ziyech is the perfect backup to Eriksen and Neres would be a very good winger to bolster our attack.

Oxlade gone, Theo & Alexis look to be leaving but don't get one of the best wingers in the league?.

Best wingers in the world — Hazard & Bale in our top 20!

I think that you have made a very valid point in regards to arsenal players, but we also must understand that all these players are going to want to play whether are not the position they are placed in is what their skill set is most suited for, you will never hear Ramsay say Walcott should be played over him, because he his a better winger.

Sanchez — The fifth best winger in the world Ozil — The world's best number 10 Cazorla - The world's best central midfielder at the moment.

ox may love cm position but in reality a good winger.

SEE MORE: Manchester United chase signing of league's best winger (not Sadio Mane) Man Utd transfer news: 3 in, 3 out as LVG to sign Liverpool target as De Gea replacement & # 91m strike - duo Manchester United predicted line up vs Newcastle: Depay & Januzaj set for key roles, Rooney dropped?

Wingers Alexis Sanchez — Alexis Sanchez is the best winger at our club, he is also probably the best dribbler, the best finisher and the hardest working.

When a target is evaluating his options to sign somewhere else and he has a chance to play alongside one of the best wingers in the game, Sanchez is a fantastic asset to have, on and off the pitch.

I think there are better wingers / forwards out there.

@sandeep Yes they can play there but they won't perform only giroud or welbeck for lacazette can perform You even didn't mention iwobi who the best winger to cover sanchez and he is not good enough to compete for the title I want 11 quality player on the field or a player with potenial Enough deadwood representing our club

After a few years where he was widely considered to be the best winger in the world â $ «a period which took in a Championsâ $ ™ League victory â $ «many believed Giggs was on his way down after a run of poor form over the last couple of seasons.