Sentences with phrase «got a contract yet»

I'm about to do pretty much the same, except that I haven't got a contract yet.

Not exact matches

He said in the interview that he is so determined to get his side of the story out that he is writing a book about what happened at the investment bank although he does not yet have a publishing contract.

So we're getting excited about a player we haven't yet signed and worried about a player with a low contract regardless of what happens with Sanchez the money will not be re invested properly so if it's the case I say keep him for the year and enjoy watching him in red and white

«So when do we get started,» he says, more statement than question, to a potential client who had yet to commit to a contract.

- Unless he really wants the headline «WWE Title Changes Hands on Foreign Soul», wouldn't Brock cashing in his rematch be just as much a Draw as Roman getting another «at bat» (unless Brock is promised X % wins / Creative Control as part of his contracts as well, in which case yet another reason not to like Brock's pampering)

Last season, for the first time fans got under his skin, and although he has stubbornly clung on to secure yet another two year extension to his contract, you can tell from his frank post season interview that the protest did affect him.

He's a barely adequate third baseman, he doesn't hit.300 or 30 home runs, yet they gave him a big five - year contract... Who are they going to get home runs from besides Carlos Delgado and Vernon Wells?

I wouldn't go for Fekir yet, aim to get him in 18 months time when he will have 1 year left on his contract and if he keeps up his form, he could be a ready made replacement for Mkhi.

I implore you to look at the possibility that for the first time since these players have been playing together we may just get the best out of all the players yet to sign new contracts.

We do pay a lot in wages for average quality yet a lot of that is running low on contract, maybe the club isn't offering so many contracts as they wish to get rid of some of them, we all know Arsenal as a club are not great at getting the right transfers done and that also includes selling.

He wasn't available for most of the season, consequently contributed little, yet he is now advising that he needs to focus on England and Arsenal so he's «not worried about his contract and leaving that to get sorted in the next few weeks»... I quote him loosely.

Still have Phil «could become United's greatest ever player» Jones shuffling around in various back 4 positions, Smalling as their best CB, haven't got a LB to rely on yet, Young just signed a new contract — how does he stack up against Alexis?

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

«They haven't signed new contracts yet, that is something we are sure about, so you are not going to get money for them if they leave at the end of the season.

You know he can sign the contract now and get injured immediately, I just don't trust his fitness yet.

RvP gets called traitor yet he refused to sign a new contract because it was the only leverage he had to try and push the club to be ambitious... a threat is pointless unless you are willing to go through with it.

Players like Ramsey, Walcott, Xhaka, etc, wouldn't even get a chance to kick a ball under Mourinho, yet Wenger hands them all pay rises, and new contracts!

Think we need a post about mesut ozil The timing of his «injuries» The amazing way his pr team Have kept him clean for not signing contract just like Sanchez yet Sanchez is getting the stick

Played great all night, his contract is so cheap yet some will still find ways to hate on him... yet you got players like Myers and AC who hardly did anything all 4 games of the playoffs.

Yep, and we wont get 3 top players anyway, we have to replace outgoing deadwood too, and anyone who runs down their contract next year (Ox, Ramsey, Gibbs, Wilshere have not signed extensions yet).

Yet these contract rebels can't even get into top 4 and do the bare minimum but want Messi wages.

And if gotten now he might be better placed to replace Alexis next season if Alexis lets his contract run down, or if not, well then at least we know he's not suitable just yet.

The fans have a right to be angry as we see the same thing time and time again yet Wenger got a new contract.

Get well soon Jack, but that has to be his Arsenal career over now, although I wouldn't be surprised to see Wenger offer him yet ANOTHER contract, like he said he was going to do recently.

Our only hope now is for the Board do a U-turn with their contract offer to Wenger, he hasn't signed it yet, so there's still HOPE and if we fail to get to the FA cup final along with finishing as low as 7th then there's a good possibility that Wenger will get the mutual agreement BOOT!

These are just Arsenal transfer rumours at the minute, Gooners, so do not get too worried just yet, but there are reports in the football media today that Arsenal are about to have our transfer resolve tested for two of the players who have just one year remaining on their current contracts.

We have not got him yet, of course, but if the BBC report is right about us having bid enough to activate a release clause in his Leicester contract then it is his decision.

Don't get me wrong I'm happy we're winning but still have a bad taste in my mouth from Wenger's cowardly «after the season ends» contract signing and yet another shambolic transfer market.

Its a contradiction to fail with this group for the last fee years yet want to offer them all contracts to stay!!!! Are our rivals going to get drastically worse Wenger so that we may overtake them, or is it that the players are good enough and Wenger is failing them?

Walcotts looking for obscene wages but who can blame him for looking for 40/50 grand more than Squillachi, Chamakh, Bendtner and Diaby... question is how they are on 50 per week in the first place, ludicrous considering we cudnt give Song a payrise yet these guys who havnt merited any wage in my opinion are on drastically inflated wages, which also now makes it almost impossible to get rid of these guys as a result and they can now sit on their arses costing us a fortune and they leave for free at their contract end.

He left because he was on his final year and cesc had 3 more to go yet we gave cesc an extension and didn't even make an attempt to improve flamini's contract and don't forget we got to the cl final with him at lb that year and then he was awesome in his final year and moved on.

According to Arsene, Arsenal have put forward their final contract offer to the right back, yet his representatives have shown no signs of getting him to put pen to paper.

«He tried getting a contract to print ballot papers in Kenya; and he didn't get it; and yet in Ghana he's lucky to walk away with a rather huge sum as compared to what the others quoted.

It's the harshest language de Blasio has leveled yet in describing the sharp - elbowed battle between Vievu, which is slated to get the contract, and its competitor.

Yet state officials agreed to cut the project's diversity hiring goal — included on state contracts to ensure minorities get a fair share of work — from 25 to 15 percent.

For example, the Hartford's administrator's contract notes that principles shall not take vacation time for the five days prior to the return of teachers to school, and yet, this year, Perry skipped out on two of the five days leading up to the beginning of the Capital Preparatory Magnet School year and even took a vacation day during one of the two «Professional Learning Days» at the beginning of the school year when administrators are supposed to be getting teachers ready for the arrival of students.

For a limited time (no word on how limited just yet) you can get a Xoom or Galaxy Tab with no activation fee on month - to - month contracts.

By the way, I posted somewhere asking if Hugh's contract with KDP was any different than everyone else's and I haven't gotten a reply yet from him.

I've spoken with agents who say publishing contracts are getting more convoluted as publishers try cover every possible publishing right even if it hasn't been discovered yet.

Yet, based on his name and the fact he was going to write an anti-Trump book, he got a traditional publishing contract.

Sometimes the need for a platform feels like a Catch 22 — you're expected to enjoy a certain level of celebrity status in your niche to get a traditional book contract, and yet, getting that status can be difficult without a book as a credential.

Yet my contracts have a clause (copied directly from the Book View Cafe contracts) that basically state that my authors have a right to audit if they can prove a 5 % or more discrepancy between what they received for royalties and what they should get.

And yet * those * writers get hardcover, starred reviews, sell well and get juicy renewal contracts.

However, it is important to know that getting a contract, especially with an author who is not known yet, is very hard to do.

You get upgraded for «free» yet you paid $ 100 more on - contract ($ 230 more at full retail) than those that will wait to pick one up on October 13 — the day the pre-installed LTE version launches.

I haven't had a chance to look at the contract yet but I get the feeling that this is one of those contract Kris Rusch and TPV warn authors about and is a prime example of why every author even considering signing a trad publishing contract needs to have an IP attorney vet it first.

I gathered the (by then) large mound of GLOWING reviews for this book, and pointed out that it had quickly earned out, according to my royalty statement (although it would be years before I'd get a penny of that, since I had not yet even written the final book on the contract, which would have to be released and earn out before I'd get a penny of royalties for the first book).

Thousands of books get loaded onto the Kindle Scout website every few months to vie for the coveted contract, yet only a handful get published.

Last year — we are getting now to Equitas — Berkshire agreed to enter into a huge retroactive reinsurance contract, a policy that protects an insurer against losses that have already happened, but whose cost is not yet known.

okay here's my two cents worth folks im up for renewal and have just nagotiated a rate 5 yr variable1.75 persent or if i want a five yr fixed at 4.49 still quite a gap between fixed and variable here i believe i have a little lee way here apparently i was only interesed in variable and five yr fixed but i made it absulutly apparent to them that when lock in from a variable i get the whosale discounted rate at that time and written into the contract i kinda believe this the way the market is heading as we head out of ressesion and the bank of canada is going to make there move i believe coming up in june and just to make this firm i do not believe the boc will raise rates in fast mode far from it will be slow process i don't care what the ecconmists are thinking we have to remember manufactering sector is reallt taking a hit on the high dollar and don't forget our niegbours to the south how dependent our canada is with them i believe it will be a slow process a lot of people heve put themselves in a debt load over these enormously low interest rates but i may be wrong i think a variable is the way to go if you want to work on that princibal at least should i say the say the short to medium term and betting that the bond markets stay put for the short to medium term - i have given enough interest to the banks maybe i can pay a little less at least fot the short to mediun term here i have not completly decided yet put i think im going variable although i wish my mtge was up a year ago that would have been just great congradulations to all that did.