Sentences with phrase «got different arguments»

She told ITV's Peston on Sunday: «He's got different arguments from David Cameron, of course he has, but he's wanting us to remain in, there's no doubt about that.»

Not exact matches

Claiming it is «impossible» to get him to consider different points of view, exasperated acquaintances of local man Kyle Dunham told reporters Wednesday that the 34 - year - old is completely unwilling to listen to even a single argument as to why ho.mose.xuality is an abomination.

In recent years as I have gotten older I have started investigating all religions so as to understand the different arguments.

Why we didn't get one is a different argument — but the starting point for that argument is not that Wenger lied to the fans.

So, if the argument is being made, that a low end NFL rookie linebacker has proved that he can play in the NFL, more so than a high end prospect, simply by getting snaps, how is that any different than with COWSER / CHUBB?

Yesterday my husband and I virtually ruined our Sunday getting into an extended argument about parenting because some interactions with people at church — who happen to have a totally different personality than I do — triggered the old doubt cycle in my mind («are we really being good parents?»).

Three - a majority of Americans don't think Assault Weapons should be legal to buy and while different wording of that poll will get different answers (I know you can find the opposite argument)- never let it be said that I'm not fair.

The cornerstone of that argument, and the way Cuomo sees himself as different and potentially more viable than more obvious 2020 prospects like Elizabeth Warren, Cory Booker, Sherrod Brown or even home - state Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand has always been that Cuomo gets done what other politicians — usually legislators — simply talk about.

Oh, and there are many different ways to get iodine in our diets that do not entail the use of refined table salt... so continuing to use table salt for the iodine is not a viable argument.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not making a «NOT MY SUPERMAN» argument here; I don't really care one way or the other what Superman is «supposed» to be like, and I welcome different interpretations of the character.

Hell, even adjusting my Facebook privacy settings is a tower defense game, but that's really getting into a whole different argument.

Actor Russell Crowe stirred up controversy earlier this year (15) when he dismissed the ageism argument, stating, «There are roles for people in all different stages of life», prompting self - confessed feminist Jessica Chastain to fire back, «I think he's getting his foot stuck in his mouth.»

In addition to dripping acid on Sequoia's desperate argument that betting the farm on Valeant CEO Michael Pearson was no different than when they bet the farm on Berkshire - Hathaway CEO Warren Buffett, Stewart also managed to get some information on the arguments made by the two board members who resigned.

My fundamental argument, though, is that people have all the control in the world to avoid the credit card game and terms by closing their accounts and / or not signing up for new credit cards or changing to another card provider (although, i don't know you are getting any different terms).

This is not about whether different people get into the controls personally or not; it's a bigger argument than that.

I have trouble falling into this «games are getting easier or harder» argument, because games are just different now.

I can understand Solid Snake enthusiasts being slightly ticked off that Raiden took the role of lead protagonist in the game, but my counter argument is that it was equally as good getting to experience Snake's antics from a completely different perspective.

My impression is that since GCR affects the isotope ratio but Tsurf often affects different isotopes differently, the analysis easily gets tangled up (circular argument?).

G&T managed to get their work out there; publishing it in Nature or Science would not have changed the fact that they're arguments just don't hold any water (they didn't do any new science, they just took what was already known, and then tried to use that to argue against what is already known — a search for logical inconsistency, which might have been worthwhile if they'd known what they were doing and if they'd gone after contrarian «theory»)-- unless it were edited, removing all the errors and non-sequitors, after which it would be no different than a physics book such as the kind a climate scientist would use...

Instead of presenting an actual argument for a different policy direction, the author is arguing that certain people who present information that might inform policy, should stop getting involved in anything related to policy and should leave it to others; presumably people with whom the author agrees.

I tend to turn the argument around: ignoring the possibility that the climate could look different in the future while making these society decisions, is given the evidence we get from a large source of scientific studies (including, indeed, imperfect models) a bit naive.

A key aspect of the argument is that this one is somehow different, in this case the lack of knowledge does not justify us in trying to get more certainty.

The extent that we care about the next generation is a serious philosophical argument — one which many people have to deal with on a smaller scale when they think about, for example, what they should do with their inheritance (which, incidentally, is a different argument to what you think about the next group in general, as kinship relationships get treated differently).

The chapter gets written as an argument, based on the working notes, but often in quite a different order, to make it easier for the reader.

Talbots tried several different arguments to get around the exclusions, but none of them worked.

But the facts of every case are different, which leads to widely varying defense options, the opportunities to get a case thrown out or dismissed, or make plea and sentencing arguments.

Sure, many lawyers like to get into esoteric arguments splitting hairs as to the difference between different communication mediums.

Interestingly, none of the above comments is attributed to Goody; her methods seemed rather different, varying from telling Shetty that other housemates did not like her, and getting right into Shetty's personal space, to having aggressive loud and frequently drunken arguments which, to her credit, Shetty fended off without descending to Goody's level.

You may also get into arguments if you have different child - rearing techniques.

On appeal, the broadcasters repeated their argument that Aereo's mini-antenna system was built specifically to get around copyright law and that Aereo was different than the situation in Cablevision because Aereo offers live TV without a license.

What makes www.sihlu.com different from any other website is the fact that for once, both people who are involved in an argument can put in their side of the story and get votes on who is right or wrong.

Listen, don't get into a long argument about anything specific (like how much your spouse drinks, or whether the last affair was sexual or whether the last violent episode was more your fault), and repeat what you said before, in different words.