Sentences with phrase «got enough pace»

Also hoping Zlatan hasn't got enough pace and finds the prem extremely tough compared to the French league.

Not exact matches

Okay, like two minutes, but that was enough to cause me to pace around the kitchen, stopping at the cookie sheet after every lap to steal one or two fries, all the while willing him to get downstairs before they were all gone.

One thing that does not get mentioned enough in the media is that he does his own job superbly, but also covers for Monreal when he races forward, and also covers for Mert's lack of pace next to him.

when chambers is in there he does nt trust him enough so he runs out of position trying to cover spots Koscielny would be covering n gets caught out, Debuchy is stronger has abit of pace and very good in the air Merts trusts him and his experience that is the same for Monreal id start Monreal or Debuchy ahead of Chambers although he is impressive for his age we shouldnt be putting all our trust into a 19 year old in that position look at Stokes first goal a simple header for the first goal conceded which he completely missed.

It's doubtful he'll get a fast pace, but he's shown enough to suggest that he'll be making a good effort in the homestretch.

Come summer we need to get rid of: Szczesny (not up tap scratch) Ospina (he wants more first team and has made it clear), Debuchy (complains rather than fights for his spot Mertesacker (Old, no pace, retire) Walcott (Never been up to scratch) Giroud (not consistent enough) Jenkinson (not good enough as second string) Flamini (please just go) Rosicky (retire and will be missed) Arteta (retire he did try for us)

Eight minutes isn't enough to get the pace quick enough for the folks who think baseball is too slow.

I can not see Ozil as MOTM... yes @ assists, 1st was corner... obviously if he's the one taking the corner there more of a chance of him getting the assisrt if we score... apart from that, the guy doesn't work hard enough for the team and with him not tracking back, you'd exepect him to have the «Messi effect» (random burst of pace — due to reserved energy)-- yet Ozil seems sluggish.

Chambers doesn't have enough pace to be playing rb and he will gets absolutely roasted by pacy wingers as we've seen.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Lacazette always looks dangerous when he gets the ball, but with the strength and pace of EPL defenders he doesn't get much time on the ball as our opponents have learned his style of play, but Wenger thinks that he still does enough for the team even though he can't seem to score any more.

Welbeck is exactly what we have been lacking up front, he has pace and skill and I feel if given enough game time (which he didn't exactly get at United) he will do surprisingly well.

I can't stand welbeck for one reason he's not better than what we have but if you played a front two of welbeck and Sanchez then Cambpell left and Walcott or chaimbo right that would give us a huge counter attacking style with lots of skill and pace, but here is the problem to do this you need big strong DM to win the ball back when we defend and we do t have them, flaming is reckless and getting old, Arteta is good on the Bala but not quick or strong enough, please don't say Diaby as we all know he will be inj soon again, then also what to do with Ozil and Corzola?

Adams is the best CB that the EPL has ever seen yet he was as slow as a lumbering cattle, you know where you need to be and who cares is you haven't got the pace, pace becomes secondary to players good enough to read the game and walk into the ideal positions.

They almost got through on Szczesny straight away but our defenders were having none of that and snuffed out the danger — and we nearly got a third goal with a quick counter but Alexis» fearsome pace and drive were not quite enough.

I don't think Pace gets enough credit for the hole he had to dig out of, while being hamstrung w / Fox / Loggains.

We have got more than enough in the dressing room to get the necessary points and with a few additions we can take this club forward at pace.

His pace is good enough to get back for defence so he is not easily beaten for pace or trickery.

I'm getting annoyed with so many ppl thinking players like mahrez or rafinha are good enough for arsenal we need to aim a lot higher if we don't want to get swollowed by bigger teams it's time wenger makes a choice on wether we are gonna do what spurs did and build a younger team with lemar goretzka or kieta and try to out run n out pace teams or spend big big money on world class players which I know he won't coz mahrez is not world class and we ain't got CL football anyway!

stubbornness in believing what we got is enough is hampering the goal.If we have simply spent 60 millions in winter with Aubemayang» pace, fire and stamina» and Carvalho (we ensure young top quality) this investment would have for sure saved us lot money when summer comes and also give us a grip in few of the targets left outside there as Utd, Cleshit and City will spend more than 150 millions each BUT WE KNOW OUR COACH COMES EVERY YEAR WITH THE LAME EXCUSE AS THERE IS NOBODY OUTSIDE THERE BETTER THAN OG, THEO AND CO..

Of course lack of pace can be revealed in different ways; not getting back in to position quickly enough but these instances are harder to pick up on.

Telling me players are not to blame is absolutely rubbish, they are to blame, yes Monaco mission was to relax and repell Arsenal and if possible shut them down completely, this gam was ours to take, First the pressure was on Monaco, they didn't know how to go about it, whether to defend their 3 - 1 advantage or press us, we had more than enough clear cut chances but as usual we were clueless in front of goal, we tried to open them apart which is impossible, Carzolla and Alexis played as if we lead 15 - 0, holding balls, try to dribble every time they have the ball and and reduce the pace and any chance of other to get through, losing balls carelessly, poor crosses is now our style, it doesn't threatened even Charlton athletic coz everyone now knows our crosses is poorly delivered and our attackers also don't have a clue how to do it even if one get through it will be wasted, this game should have been won by range attempts which was only tried once by ÖZIL and was blocked.

I had personally never heard of Perez before we signed him but what I've seen of him on videos he's got pace, I think he should jump straight ahead of Giroud in the pecking order, we have suffered in the last 4 years having to watch Giroud go on his infamous streaks of not scoring goals, last season he went 15 EPL games without a goal, the season before that the 14/15 season he went on a 9 game streak of scoring zero goals we've had enough of Giroud he's proven over and again that he's not good enough!

We did nt get it and the longer the season goes on the more dependant we will become on goals from midfield, which makes our attacking predictable and easy to defend, we have no element of surprise in attack, nobody dribbles or runs past an opponent at pace at Arsenal, its all based on rotating positions and passing until a gap opens, the big sides, and smaller ones aswel wont always give you the gap, and even when the gap does prevent itself your depending on Giroud being clinical enough to take the chance, and he is not clinical.

Sorry about this Brendan, I know you've got enough on your plate at the moment, but you can't expect to get away with comments like that with Liverpool finishing 25 points off the pace.

The two defenders beaten, Ade used his pace and guile to head the ball past a hapless and ordinary looking Green and then somehow caused the earth to rotate just enough to get a ball that looked as if it was past the end line to spin into the goal.

Townsend 6 — Didn't get down the wings and use his pace often enough to be effective on the right.

While managers such as Klopp, Pochettino, Conte and even Eddie Howe have built momentum based on intensity, pace, movement and pressing, West Ham fumble and stumble around haphazardly hoping that they might eventually get a free kick close enough to goal.

It is hard seeing Liverpool come through with enough to get the win on the board, but they do have the pace going forward to hurt the Red Devils at the back.

It did cause the rest of our defence to be put under pressure though as Pisano doesn't yet seem fit enough to get back at pace after his forays upfield.

Not quite enough pace and he doesn't seem to get himself into dangerous (to the opponents) positions.

As long as your baby is getting enough breast milk and growing at a healthy, consistent pace, it doesn't matter if you nurse from one breast or both breasts at each feeding.

If you are breastfeeding, it's important to pace feed so you don't overfeed your baby... which would cause problems and make you feel like they're not getting enough.

She also needs to make sure she is getting enough rest and pacing herself with all her energy levels.

Start with 25 minutes on the treadmill at a slow, relaxed pace, just enough to get your heart rate up.

I would suggest resting long enough to be able to get your breath back so you can do another fast sprint at an anaerobic pace, but not to rest so long that you feel fully recovered.

What makes PiYo special is that the deceptively simple movements, undertaken with care, will deliver surprisingly rapid results, and the sessions themselves are paced just fast enough to be sure every student is working hard, but are accessible enough to ensure that nobody gets left behind.

Pace the involvement enough to get to know each other thoroughly and ascertain that there is compatibility.

Her participation won't likely be enough to get a broad audience to «Under the Skin,» given its somber pacing and downer themes, although stills of the actress's lingerie scenes frankly might help.

The film never really resonates, but there is something to kind of enjoy in Andrew Fleming's directorial perk, which at least begets an adequate pace that in turn begets some entertainment value which actually may be endearing enough to get those with patience by.

Although it's a welcome enough change of pace all the colour - coded switch - pressing gets old relatively quickly.

Despite sloppy moment - to - moment editing the film's pace works well enough; this is a movie with some energy, and along with the amiable leads and just - enough - jokes script (by Freaks and Geeks» own John Francis Daley, working with Jonathan M. Goldstein, as well as Michael Markowitz) that's enough to get a pass from me.

«Boiler Room» (2000) 67 percent: Its ending is disappointingly tidy, but this film boasts just enough sharp writing and brisk pacing to make getting there worthwhile — and the performances, including Diesel as a young financial hotshot, are energetic and winning.

The pacing and plotting are just enough to hold your interest and get you to overlook some off - key moments.

But Ron Howard keeps this piece moving, and sets the perfect tone and pace for this project so that each part of its layered narrative gets enough screen time and makes sense.

However, as with other literary to cinematic conversions the Hunger Games anthology is prey to the unfortunate pitfall of not knowing when to stop and the final 20 minutes languish on, pacing becomes an issue, and the veritable cinematic marathon finishes on fumes, barely enough to get across the finish line.

Coming into any sequel blindly can make that experience tough to sit through without getting too confused or losing interest; fortunately because this is a feel - good movie and the ensemble cast has strong chemistry — it wouldn't surprise me one bit if half the time Terrence Howard isn't even in character while cameras are rolling — the story actually moves along at a comfortable pace, enough to make certain loose ends easy to ignore (again, if you're coming in without seeing the original).

It never slows down long enough to get to know the characters, nor does it speed up enough to achieve a decent pace.

This change of pace catches one off guard, yet the overall experience maintains enough moxie to get the message across.

The film already had slight pacing issues at 85 minutes, so it runs a little long but I still can't get enough personally.