Sentences with phrase «got the policy which»

«There are people who have a direct business interest in preventing any policies which would reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and there are also people who have a direct business interest in getting policies which would reduce greenhouse gas emissions enacted.»

«We have got policies which all poll very well nationally.

Getting a policy which can follow you no matter where you work may be preferred, and these are called private or portable policies.

Searching for the insurance for my car and finally got the policy which i want from Liberty Videocon General Insurance.

When you are comparing cheap car insurance in Virginia you want to be sure you get a policy which fits your vehicular needs.

What that means is you can get policies which will last anywhere between 1 year and 30 years, but after the end of the term they will expire, so you can not get one to cover your whole life.

You must be an AARP member to apply and get their policies which costs $ 16 per year.

Is there any way that I could get a policy which would help with my father's final expenses as well as my expenses associated with his death?

Because you opted to get the policy which offers you to pay nothing, but in return will give you nothing as well.

Some people prefer to get a policy which spans from your age now to your retirement age; thereby providing for their kids and spouse.

Not exact matches

They resent that BitLicense requires companies covered by the policy to get pre-approval for every new product rollout — which the companies think might be a slow process.

It achieves that by raising or lowering its policy interest rate, which influences other interest rates such as what you'll pay on your mortgage or auto loan, and the return you'll get on the balance in your savings account.

Far better, Friedman argues, to emulate forward - thinking companies like LinkedIn, Netflix and Calgary's BluEra, which offer unlimited vacation policies to emphasize that it's OK to take as much — or as little — time off, as long as employees get their jobs done.

If anything has gotten easier for Barkan despite the physical and emotional challenges that comes with his illness, it's that the issues he is now advocating for are much simpler to explain to people than US interest rate policy, which has been his focus at the Center for Popular Democracy.

The biggest driver of economic growth next year will be from household consumption, which policy makers reckon will get a boost from the federal government's tax cuts and its decision to augment monthly child benefits.

Poloz's appointment was as stunning as it gets in the staid world of monetary policy — which is to say it was a mild surprise.

This is a kick - the - tires grace period in which you can terminate the policy and get your money back without paying a surrender charge.

Additionally, you can get extended insurance which covers things that fall outside the basic policy.

This data shouldn't change the Fed's interest - rate strategy, as a rising labor force participation rate will put a lid on inflation regardless of how it's done, but it should lower our confidence that the Fed can solve the problem of a bifurcated workforce, in which a large chunk of workers are getting left behind, simply through interest rate policy.

When he got back to the office he put his insight into practice, launching Soma's «Work From Anywhere Week» policy which, just like it sounds, allows the entire team to log on from anywhere they please for one week each quarter.

Last week, Olive Garden's parent company Darden Restaurants got heat from New York hedge fund Starboard Value, which charged that an overly liberal breadstick policy was costing the company as much as $ 5 million a year.

The boss of Steadfast Group says Australia's largest insurance companies are getting antsy about the success of its inhouse broker trading platform, which forces them to bid for policies against competitors.

Democratic legislators, who are far outnumbered in the House and Senate and wield no power over which legislation gets considered, tried repeatedly over three committee hearings on Monday and Tuesday to amend the gun control bills to include an assault weapons ban and other, more stringent policies.

Finally, and again, discounting this «permanent» stuff, I'm sure there's another recession out there somewhere, which adds yet another important topic to my to - do list: getting our policy response ready.

Which is about what you would expect, since the Ross / Navarro trade policy analysis is based on a mistake that would get you flunked out of an AP economics class.

With a renters insurance policy you get at least $ 100,000 in liability coverage which would be more than enough to cover the average dog bite.

A lower debt target would also be problematic, since it would mean rejecting much of the policy platform on which the government got elected.

It was designed to encourage lending to households and businesses at a time when banks were facing increasing funding costs, which meant that borrowers weren't getting the full benefit of low policy rates.

«One important policy question on which most economists appear to agree, however, is that there is very little to be said in favour of taxing corporations.1 Many would agree, for example, that the title of a recent paper — «The Corporate Income Tax and How to Get Rid of It» (Vickrey, 1991)-- adequately conveys the main message of the extensive economic literature on this subject.

It's a highly complex process — all matters of policy are entwined in and affect various departments, after all — which partly explains why Congress often seems to have such difficulty getting anything accomplished, including repealing Obamacare.

What Everybody Ought to Know About Nonprofit Insurance The specifics of nonprofit insurance companies has many wondering just how much scope and coverage they get to provide to those working for nonprofit organizations and if these services are really what they claim to be, which looks to consider just how little is known about these types of policies.

Now, a once - in - a-decade leadership shift is getting in the way of the stimulus - happy policies to which investors became accustomed.

This year's experience with tax reform has reinforced a well - known policy gripe: it is easy to say we need to get rid of tax expenditures, but it is hard to say which ones we ought to get rid of.

But developing country policy - makers face some big questions too, which are rightly getting more attention.

The industrial and materials sectors — which saw their earnings decline in 2016 — may also get a boost from Trump's policies.

And why is that the Central Banks are getting away with policies that really are completely insane and which none of us voted for?

She is kind of settled with this too because she talked about that with the tax cut and the fiscal policy today which was good, not in any type of derogatory way, but she is worried about maybe the increase in debt, but she's hoping that if this tax cut is stimulative it will be supply - side leaning and we will get greater productivity growth which she said would be the good type of growth that she wants.

If she had added: «Plus, even though we are currently above the Effective Lower Bound on nominal interest rates (which is probably below 0 %) we are worried that the margin of safety is getting a bit small, and are pleased that fiscal policy is making that margin of safety a bit bigger than it otherwise would be» that would also be an internally consistent thing for the Bank of Canada to say.

«The Chinese are deeply concerned and we hear now from reliable sources in Beijing who suggest the Chinese government, the Communist Party, are developing lists of U.S. interests against which they could retaliate, commercial interests, and obviously one merely has to look at top U.S. exports to China to get a quick sense of whose heads may be on the chopping block,» said one China trade policy expert who interacts closely with U.S. business.

We can look at the specifics of what the policy debate should be, which is what gets into the background system and all that stuff.

National security often gets linked to immigration, which itself significantly boosts the US Christian population; Trump's order marks the most drastic changes in refugee policy since the wake of 9/11.

Immigration policy at this point in history, it seems to me, is a classic case in which not only will the insistence on the best defeat the better, but in which it is very difficult to get agreement on what might be better.

What I don't get is, being critical of Zionistic policies, agenda or people is quickly labeled as «anti-semitic» and is even considered illegal in countries like Germany, yet a bigoted person like Geert Wilders (who has not once consulted any expect or scholar on Islam) can make a video which literally embodies everything that hate, racism, and ignorance is about, and yet get away with it where the court recognizes it as «denigrating» but not «illegal»!?

What I care about is who is smarter, has more experience with foreign policy, has done more to avert a financial meltdown that could very well have spelled disaster for the world economy, got rid of Ghadafi and Bin Laden, which is certainly more than Bush did, who has shown restraint in his remarks instead of recklessness.

«What the United Kingdom has got to demonstrate is that it can support the existence of the state of Israel but you're not anti-Israeli if you find points of Israel policy with which you disagree.»

While this debate has provided fodder for policy wonks, it has not had much influence on Capitol Hill which seems poised to allow federal unemployment benefits to lapse without much of an alternative strategy for getting the long term jobless working again.

For example, stockholder action is a strategy in which owners of stock in a company which advertises on TV seek to get the company to adopt a policy not to place advertising on violent programs.

So Rick Perry wears his religion on his sleeve, where all the world can see his piety, yet Romney gets slammed on and hated on for his religion (which lots of poeple don't know much about, nor want to know about, they've just «heard» its different), which he has repeatedly stated would not guide his policy as president.

When groups of citizens get together to accomplish purposes of mutual interest (from which they derive no profit), it should not be the responsibility of government to inspect, evaluate and approve their endeavors on the basis of supposed conformity to the prevailing notion of «public benefit» or «public policy» of the moment.

in the context of the present government policy of high - tech development based on the global free market, the dalits, the tribals and the fisherfolk are increasingly getting alienated from the Land, the Forest and the Water - sources respectively which have been giving them their living, and are also getting uprooted from their habitat and culture; and women are commoditized and their sexuality, fertility and labour are increasingly commercialized.