Sentences with phrase «got warm reviews»

And she's got pop credentials: Her recent book, Mating in Captivity: Unlocking Erotic Intelligence, got warm reviews.

Not exact matches

Hands down one of the most well - reviewed and best shaving bowls we've come across, the porcelain shaving bowls from Edwin Jagger do an excellent job of retaining heat to allow you to get that warm lather you desire.

Thanks for the continued inspiration... 90 % of the time that I go looking for a recipe, I end up here, I end up making something from your neverending list of fabulous choices, and it ends up being amazing, getting rave reviews and giving me warm fuzzies inside that I have made friends & family happy and content.

Jessica brought it to a happy hour hosted by a mama friend and it got rave reviews when served warm with plate of veggies and gluten - free baguette bread.

If you are struggling to get your breastfed baby to take a bottle, have a read of my review of the yoomi self warming bottle — it is amazing!

As Cameron patronisingly told him in the warm - up for the spending review: «If you have not got a plan, you can not attack a plan.»

Now that you're warmed up, it's time to get into our MIG welder reviews.

Now that you're warmed up, let's get into the reviews!

Now that you know how to choose a great bottle warmer, let's get right to the reviews.

When we see reviews from customers who are blown away that a chemical - free product could be so effective, we get a little warm and fuzzy inside.

I was thisclose to getting those North Face boots in your slider for our trip to Washington, but all the reviews said they didn't keep your feet warm (sort of defeats the purpose, ha!).

I got the Warm Rust palette after a utuber reviewed it in comparison to the new Urban Decay Naked Heat Palette and I am in love with it.

Adult Dating Sites Reviewed The Great Awokening — Autostraddle, a website for lesbian and queer women, had published a warm review of the Seth Rogen adult cartoon Sausage Party... The taco aside, Hogan's post included a forthright account of her site's critical practices, using as an... GOT IT.

Asghar Farhadi's film has already been reviewed for the site by Jansen, but as I wanted to see it badly since Cannes (and also because Blue is the Warmest Colour is one of the hardest films to get into this year) I took the chance to catch it.

Gus Van Sant's Don't Worry, He Won't Get Far on Foot was one such film, earning warm early reviews; the biopic about artist John Callahan stars Joaquin Phoenix, Jonah Hill, and Rooney Mara, a triple axel of awards - bait talent.

So far, the reviews for Kevin Macdonald's «State of Play» seem uniformly warm — which comes as a relief to me after the rather indifferent vibe I got from the film's entire marketing strategy.

His performance as reporter David Lipsky is part of a two - hander and is getting almost as warm reviews as Segel's.

I'd love to get your feedback on the Warming Planet series via a review on Amazon.

This story, «Kindle Paperwhite review: Ebook reader gets warmer, faster» was originally published by TechHive.

This double - lined sweater gets good reviews for its functionality in keeping dogs warm.

However, the thing you have to understand is that what he gets through peer - review is far less threatening to the mainstream picture of anthropogenic global warming than you'd think from the spin he puts on it in press releases, presentations and the blogosphere.

It's a review of a University of Minnesota social sciences seminar on «how to get the world to stop talking and do something about global warming.»

To get an idea of why it's important to have icebreakers even in a warming world, review our 2005 series, «The Big Melt» and the series of posts here last year on Arctic shipping efforts.

Other researchers who are publishing in Peer reviewed journals think it may get a lot warmer.

By Gene J. Koprowski Contrary to the commonly held scientific conclusion that the Earth is getting warmer, a scientist who has written more than 150 peer - reviewed papers has unveiled evidence for his prediction that global cooling is coming soon.

In both my personal experience of peer review and in discussions with medical colleagues on this subject, I know — and, boy, BillD really ought to know — how the peer review process can get screwed up by the sorts of concerted and deliberately deceptive measures practiced by the anthropogenic global warming cabal that was cataclysmically de-pantsed by the Climategate revelations, particularly with regard to the insights provided by the e-mails of the C.R.U. correspondents.

If you aren't known to be a warmer you don't get to peer review for the journals considered important to the climate change game.

Ideas for businesses, and hope for everyone concerned about global warming — that's what you get with our just - published, first annual Innovations Review.

It is a fascinating story with many aspects to it including the cliques and peer reviews you mention Steve McIntyre has been deconstructing Mann's theory graph by graph, proxy by proxy, formula by formula Heavyweight statisticians like Wegman are now getting on board and the theories are starting to unravel We find ourselves at a very interesting stage in the theory of Global Warming

That in turn has prompted a slew of news stories on the case, the general gist of which you can get from the headlines: Media and rights organizations defend National Review, et al. against Michael Mann (The Washington Post) Climate scientist faces broad array of foes in suit vs. National Review (Reuters) Groups rally around think tank, publication being sued for global warming views (Fox News)... and of course:...

My case is not that I «James Delingpole have taken a long hard look at the science of global warming and discovered through careful sifting of countless peer - reviewed papers that the experts have got it all wrong.»

The idea is to make it impossible for scientists who are skeptical of global warming to receive any funding or get published in peer - reviewed journals — and then declare that, lo and behold, there are no published scientists who are skeptical about global warming!

Siberian husky The proposition is false that «nobody at WUWT can get anything published in the real world» is refuted by the fact that I have published four peer reviewed articles in the literature of global warming climatology.

The proposition is false that «nobody at WUWT can get anything published in the real world,» This proposition is falsified by the fact that I have published four peer reviewed articles in the literature of global warming climatology.

No matter how well informed you are, no matter how many peer - reviewed studies you cite, or how many times you point out the overwhelming agreement based on the evidence that exists among climate scientists that global warming is real and is principally caused by human fossil fuel use, you will get no where.

The issue is not that no research calling into question aspects of global warming is getting funded; this is why the open question of why Antarctica is cooling still gets papers published in peer - reviewed journals.

Judging by the number of hits some climate change websites get, regardless if they're «warmer» or «skeptic» sites I'd say he not only got the book wrong, he got the reason for bad reviews and sales wrong, too.

The idea is to make it impossible for scientists who are skeptical of global warming to receive any funding or get published in peer - reviewed journals â $» and then declare that, lo and behold, there are no published scientists who are skeptical about global warming!

Even though teaching global warming science has been part of UK school curriculum since the mid 90s, the head government advisor reviewing national education plans says schools should «get back to the science in science.»