And we've still
got warming deniers to deal with.
Not exact matches
Reaction: De Bruyne is my Man City blueprint — Guardiola (Premier League) Report: De Bruyne makes it sweet 16 for awesome Man City (Premier League) Report: Otamendi wins derby to fire Man City 11 points clear (Premier League) Reaction: Klopp calls for Liverpool focus after Euro spree (Champions League) Report: «Fab Four» fire seven - goal Liverpool into last 16 (Champions League) Reaction: Mourinho pledges only «the truth» on injuries (Champions League) Report: Lukaku and Rashford send Man United into last 16 (Champions League) Reaction: Mourinho wants new shooting boots for Lukaku (Premier League) Report: Old boy Young downs Watford to lift Man United (Premier League) Reaction: Klopp looks on bright side after Chelsea draw (Premier League) Report: Willian
denies Liverpool morale - boosting win (Premier League) Reaction: Guardiola targets Champions League milestone (Champions League) Report: Sterling strikes late to earn Man City top spot (Champions League) Report: Young England stifle Neymar's Brazil (friendly) Reaction: Loftus - Cheek showed he can cut it — Southgate (friendly) Report: New boys impress as England hold Germany (friendly) Reaction: Mourinho defends lack of Lukaku charity (Champions League) Report: Hapless Svilar helps Man Utd to brink of last 16 (Champions League) Reaction: «Stand up and be counted», Klopp tells Liverpool (Premier League) Report: Spurs» Kane rips sorry Liverpool to shreds (Premier League) Reaction: Guardiola proud to beat «best opponents» Napoli (Champions League) Report: Jesus earns Man City narrow win over Napoli (Champions League) Reaction: Mourinho and Klopp at odds over Anfield stalemate (Premier League) Report: Man Utd held at Liverpool as Mourinho parks the bus (Premier League) Report: McClean breaks Welsh hearts as Ireland reach play - offs (2018 World Cup) Reaction: Southgate admits England have long way to go (2018 World Cup) Report: Kane sends lacklustre England to World Cup (2018 World Cup) Reaction: Man City's show of force thrills Guardiola (Champions League) Report: Chelsea old boy De Bruyne gives Man City crucial win (Champions League) Reaction: «Amazing» Lukaku won't lose focus — Mourinho (Champions League) Report: Lukaku and Martial lead Man United in CSKA rout (Champions League) Reaction: Klopp says Liverpool on track despite stalemate (Champions League) Report: Coutinho scores as Liverpool held in Moscow (Champions League) Reaction: Man United part of «second level», says Mourinho (Champions League) Report: Fix - it Fellaini
gets Man United off the mark (Champions League) Reaction: De Bruyne masterclass leaves Guardiola purring (Premier League) Report: Mané sent off as five - star Man City crush Liverpool (Premier League) Reaction: Alli gesture takes shine off England win (2018 World Cup) Report: Rashford redemption sends England closer to Russia (2018 World Cup) Reaction: Klopp hopes Euro progress yields transfer lift (Champions League) Report: Can brace
gets Liverpool back into big time (Champions League) Report: Sterling rescue act spares 10 - man Man City (Premier League) Reaction: Conte happy for Chelsea to play the hunters (Premier League) Report: Alonso ruins Spurs» Wembley house -
warming (Premier League) Report: Lukaku double fires Man United to winning start (Premier League) Reaction: Wenger lauds Giroud after Arsenal edge Leicester (Premier League) Report: Giroud earns Arsenal madcap opening win (Premier League) Reaction: Wenger fearful of another slow Arsenal start (Community Shield) Report: Courtois and Morata gift Arsenal victory at Wembley (Community Shield)
As for pundits the Merson types are like climate scientists who
deny global
warming is anthropgenic, not because they really believe it but because it
gets them exposure in the media which they wouldn't
get if they simply went along with the crowd.
On the right you've
got creationists and global
warming deniers, on the left you've
got crazy GMO fear mongering.
As the world
gets warmer (which no one is
denying) you are going to see more instances of high temperatures, including more record - setting highs and less record - setting lows.
By my understanding, very few scientists and those who follow the issue closely will
deny that the planet is
getting warmer.
Getting sidetracked about discussions concerning how far they can swim is just sick obfuscation being propagated by
deniers who want to discredit any global
warming science.
I
got links expose the Exxson's bad activity on global
warming (/ / www.exxposeexxon.com)(/ / www.worldoutofbalance.org) Exxson is global
warming denier, Exxson did not meaningful invest on renewable energy, Exxson want to drill Arctic and so on.
(CO2 causes
warming, AGW is happening, etc) Do I still
get the
denier label?
I
get endless angry e-mail thanks to my own web site, The Cost of Energy, for talking about global
warming and peak oil, a combination that darkens the skies with
deniers, I can assure you.
When I read Dot Earth, I
get irritated by those who
deny the realities of global
warming or peak oil or overpopulation; who are unwilling to change in thinking or in attitude or in lifestyle.
It is
getting harder and harder to
deny the scientific evidence of global
warming, even for the skeptics.
The letter portends to offer facts about «climate change
deniers, but readers can't even
get further than the first paragraph without running into an unsupportable talking point about skeptic climate scientists saying global
warming «isn't happening / happening, but for natural reasons / happening and caused by humans, but it's not so bad.»
Cameron: «Anybody that is a global -
warming denier at this point in time has
got their head so deeply up their ass I'm not sure they could hear me.»
Some meteorologists who might otherwise be global
warming deniers might, because they are flattered that they
got an interview with the President,» he said.
If we want to win the debate for the minds of people who aren't hard set in their views, we don't
get there by
denying what is, frankly, obvious on first principles: GHGs
warm the atmosphere.
Previous research has shown that the core proponents of global
warming delusionism including Stephen Milloy, Fred Singer and Fred Seitz
got their start as shills for PM,
denying the risks of passive smoking.
Hey, I just made 4 rational, reasonable, restrained replies to global
warming deniers on Breitbart News, and
got banned, for spamming.
It's also a classic example of confirmation bias:
Deniers get giddy when it snows because it appears to confirm their belief that Earth isn't really
getting warmer.
We don't
get any closer to science by
denying the significant possibility that we are causing significantly adverse changes in climate than we do by the ridiculous assertion that we understand the chaotic complexity of climate well enough to say with certainty how many parts per millions of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere will lead to how many degrees of global
warming.
«
Deniers»
get ridiculed but the most vicious comments seem to be reserved for those who technically agree with the global
warming hypothesis but are not in lock step with the most extreme forecasts.
We can not afford to
get global
warming wrong — yet we are, thanks to
deniers and their methods.
It's hard to
deny that there may be some risk, just as its impossible to
deny one might
get hit by a car tomorrow morning, but this is speculative in the extreme, and ignores a vast number of counteracting «negative» feedbacks from the biosphere, as well as the lack of average global
warming of the last 18 years.
Unfortunately it seems that among large segments of the general «science supporting» population you can
get yourself labeled as ignorant, a
denier, anti-science, evil, or worse by just noting anything from recent IPCC documents that could be perceived to threaten any of the current «
warmest» talking points.
It's funny that the global
warming advocates constantly
get caught alteeing their findings to match their claims, yet the
deniers have never had to manipulate data to prove their point.
Morano said that he was told by members of his own staff in the Environment & Public Works Committee to «lay off» of pushing climate change skepticism because it was affecting their ability to
get jobs, «because Inhofe was being painted as an extremist for
denying global
warming.»
I'm
getting used to being insulted, called a cretin, a
denier, and other choice words by columnists, scientists who ought to know better, and run of the mill sheep who follow the global
warming pipers.
Climate science
deniers are very fond of showing extremely deceptive temperature graphs: They plot the data starting in 1998, when temperatures were higher than average, so it looks like the world hasn't
gotten much
warmer since then, and talk about the global
warming «pause.»
They helped
get us into the mess we are now in by
denying the evidence of global
warming for decades, the reckless encouragement of population growth both in Australia and abroad (at least, indirectly, by its support of President George W Bush who as cut funding to family planning aid to the Third World) and they certainly won't be helping to
get us out of the mess.
Publications that reported climate science news of ominous developments were hounded by angry letters to the editor demanding that the contrary view,
denying global
warming as a problem, should
get equal time.
I think they all
get together with the global
warming deniers on a Saturday night and party.»
That's why I won't use the word «sceptic» to describe the people who
deny the link between releasing
warming gases and the planet
getting warmer.
This is simply yet another data point in an increasingly long line of evidence showing global
warming is real, along with all the evidence that it's
getting worse, we're causing it, and the spin against it by the
deniers is approaching light speed.
«Anybody that is a global -
warming denier at this point in time has
got their head so deeply up their ass I'm not sure they could hear me.
By
denying global
warming, people will continue to be stupid and we're only going to
get more sick and disease - ridden.
To continually state climate can not possibly change so fast nor
get as
warm as the IPCC scenarios say is to
deny reality.
Limbaugh, who frequently attempts to
deny climate change, concluded his segment by claiming that he was helping Brown
get his message out: «We've
gotten your message out for 25 years, the message that there isn't any
warming, and there isn't in the specifically past 18 years.
What global
warming deniers can't seem to
get through their thick skulls is that four major climate research centers exist, including Hadley.
So global
warming's not really going to make anyone lazier per se; it's going to make it unnaturally difficult to
get any work done outside — though some (climate
deniers, * cough cough *) will inevitably chalk the declining productivity up to some collective lack of a will to work, I wonder how many people would last 8 hours harvesting crops by hand in 100 degree heat.
News releases and blogs on climate
denier web sites have publicized the claim from the paper's news release that «Climate models
get energy balance wrong, make too hot forecasts of global
warming».
We're
getting into «are you now, or have you ever been, a global
warming denier» territory.
Smokey: Do you
deny that some vocal skeptics have been disputing the evidence that the world was
getting warmer?
One has only to examine the motives of those who make their income from publishing books versus those who earn their income from doing science to
get a hint of why global
warming deniers tend to focus on only the findings that support their point of view.