Anders, the aims of the club are set by the Board / kroenke but it is not clear to us fans what those aims are,
we get vague statements but nothing specific.
So far, we've only
got a vague statement saying the tablet will be out in time for the holiday season.
Not exact matches
So companies will not be able to use
vague or confusing
statements to
get you to agree to give them data.
You've
got to have quite an imagination to be able to read such a specific outcome from such a
vague statement.
They can
get away with
vague statements like «Made in Australia using local and imported ingredients».
They know exactly what we mean when we say they need to
get their act together.The truth is,
vague statements don't work.
And you are setting off a wide range of Google searches, but all you
get in return is
vague statements on every self - proclaimed, baby - care expert website.
This let me walk around from group to group and push them a little to
get less superficial in their note - taking — to include specific details instead of just making general
statements, for instance, or to avoid repeating the same
vague comments.
Sometimes the royalty
statements I've received are so
vague it's tough to
get really explore it any deeper.
Is it partially our own fault for superimposing our own fantasies on Sega's
vague teaser
statements that never explicitly said «FEATURING THE OLD 16 - BIT GRAPHICS YOU RETROFAGS HAVE NEVER BEEN ABLE TO
GET OVER»?
In a way, it's just about being transparent with consumers and maybe a little bit less of the
vague statements that we
get from the Xbox team but if they manage to pull it off, I don't see any significant obstacles to it being a successful and profitable venture for the Xbox.
I had gone through maybe five, and discovered that none were climate scientists, one was Honeycutt (the Timbuk2 entrepreneur), one was a Finnish blogger who to his credit explicitly declared that he was not a climate scientist (on his blog, I think), one was Nuccitelli, who I might have heard of before, one was logicman, and of course Cook, who is beyond the power of any degrees to restore (and
statements like he «studied physics» are too
vague — I've
got «Six Easy Pieces» and «Six Not So Easy Pieces», so I, and millions, have studied physics.)
I've been looking, but have up till now only
gotten mixed messages when it comes to it's legality; just a jumble of legislative actions, court rulings, and public
statements all wrapped in a confusing multi-year timeline and many
vague / assuming articles in the press.
Good on Microsoft, then, for
getting in front of the issue with the following
statement by a Microsoft representative, though it's awfully
vague:
First, the employer already knows your objective is to
get the job — and second, these
statements are typically written in such a broad - based, generic, and
vague manner that they don't tell the employer anything about you as a candidate — and they fail to set you apart in a sea of other candidates.
A
vague statement will
get your resume redirected to the trash can.
Numbers will
get the attention of the recruiter in a far more effective manner than
vague statements.
Actual numbers will
get the reader's attention far more effectively than
vague statements.